| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The exact same test case covered by this file is also in
fixedbugs/bug121.go. No need for duplication.
Also, the actual syntax error tested (multiple method names
with a single signature) is an unlikely syntax error, and
only here for historical reasons (in the very beginning, this
was actually possible to write). Now, virtually nobody is making
this mistake.
Change-Id: I9d68e0aee2a63025f44e6338647f8250ecc3077a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/307789
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Follows suit with https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/20111.
Generated by running
$ grep -R 'Go Authors. All' * | cut -d":" -f1 | while read F;do perl -pi -e 's/Go
Authors. All/Go Authors. All/g' $F;done
The code in cmd/internal/unvendor wasn't changed.
Fixes #15213
Change-Id: I4f235cee0a62ec435f9e8540a1ec08ae03b1a75f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21819
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
X ,s;^// \$G (\$D/)?\$F\.go *$;// compile;g
X ,s;^// \$G (\$D/)?\$F\.go && \$L \$F\.\$A *$;// build;g
X ,s;^// \$G (\$D/)?\$F\.go && \$L \$F\.\$A && \./\$A\.out *$;// run;g
X ,s;^// errchk \$G( -e)? (\$D/)?\$F\.go *$;// errorcheck;g
R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5671080
|
|
* example-based syntax errors (go.errors)
* enable bison's more specific errors
and translate grammar token names into
tokens like ++
* test cases
R=ken2, r, ken3
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/194085
|
