| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The test is designed to ensure that behavior introduced in Go 1.23
to garbage collect async timed channels is working correctly. If
GO111MODULE=off is set (or GODEBUG=asynctimerchan=1) Go reverts to the
Go 1.20 behavior of not garbage collecting these channels, which fails
the test.
Instead of running a test in conditions where we know it will fail,
just skip the test. A more comprehensive test does not make sense
right now because this code may go away soon.
Fixes #76948.
Change-Id: Ib186abd2ea583a06b5c246bfd6df932522cf7f1e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/732100
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Husin <husin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
The OpenBSD armv7 port does not support SMP - on this platform the
TestLongAdjustTimers test passes in ~46 seconds on the openbsd/arm
builder when there is no other CPU contention, however it will almost
always fail when there is any other load.
Change-Id: Idf1c47b40376c749886843cdae11289c0984f714
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/698556
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
|
The TestLongAdjustTimers test has been consistently timing out
after 60 seconds on plan9-arm. Skip the test for plan9, as it
is already skipped for being too slow on android and ios.
Fixes #74921
Change-Id: Icc32e902cecd2e98971a898373fe8346b179437d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/693955
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Freeman <markfreeman@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I33b61629dfabffa15065a14fccdb418bab11350d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/623915
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I418953a766db22b134a9569161f06cf8682c1eef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/591336
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
|
|
Trying to write a test for the corner cases in the old async timer chan
implementation may have been a mistake, especially since this isn't
going to be the default timer chan implementation anymore.
But let's try one more time to fix the test.
I reproduced the remaining builder failures on my Mac laptop
by overloading the CPU in one window and then running 48 instances
of the flaky test in loops using 'stress' in another window.
It turns out that, contrary to my understanding of async timers
and therefore contrary to what the test expected, it is technically
possible for
t := time.NewTicker(1)
t.Reset(1000*time.Hour)
<-t.C
<-t.C
to observe two time values on t.C, as opposed to blocking forever.
We always expect the first time value, since the ticker goes off
immediately (after 1ns) and sends that value into the channel buffer.
To get the second value, the ticker has to be in the process of
going off (which it is doing constantly anyway), and the timer
goroutine has to be about to call sendTime and then get rescheduled.
Then t.Reset and the first <-t.C have to happen.
Then the timer goroutine gets rescheduled and can run sendTime's
non-blocking send on t.C, which finds an empty buffer and writes
a value.
This is unlikely, of course, but it definitely happens. This program
always panics in just a second or two on my laptop:
package main
import (
"os"
"time"
)
func main() {
os.Setenv("GODEBUG", "asynctimerchan=1")
for {
go func() {
t := time.NewTicker(1)
t.Reset(1000*time.Hour)
<-t.C
select {
case <-t.C:
panic("two receives")
case <-time.After(1*time.Second):
}
}()
}
}
Because I did not understand this nuance, the test did not expect it.
This CL rewrites the test to expect that possibility. I can no longer
make the test fail under 'stress' on my laptop.
For #66322.
Change-Id: I15c75d2c6f24197c43094da20d6ab55306a0a9f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/585359
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
For #66322.
Change-Id: I1d83c7a3cacd2ab012039d954270a7c87bbdf5ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/584195
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
|
The overall time package tests increase from 3.85s to 4.85s on my laptop.
But they should be less flaky, and the time is spent sleeping, so it won't
slow down the overall machine running multiple package tests in
parallel.
For #66322.
Change-Id: I66d6647c389c943b53045e8836ede4ba3d4670c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/581315
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
|
Should fix longtest build dashboard flake:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/golang/builders/ci/gotip-linux-amd64-longtest/b8753459332096992401/overview
Change-Id: I613bd4337aa65180389674e136d215135fde3196
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/571803
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
A proposal discussion in mid-2020 on #37196 decided to change
time.Timer and time.Ticker so that their Stop and Reset methods
guarantee that no old value (corresponding to the previous configuration
of the Timer or Ticker) will be received after the method returns.
The trivial way to do this is to make the Timer/Ticker channels
unbuffered, create a goroutine per Timer/Ticker feeding the channel,
and then coordinate with that goroutine during Stop/Reset.
Since Stop/Reset coordinate with the goroutine and the channel
is unbuffered, there is no possibility of a stale value being sent
after Stop/Reset returns.
Of course, we do not want an extra goroutine per Timer/Ticker,
but that's still a good semantic model: behave like the channels
are unbuffered and fed by a coordinating goroutine.
The actual implementation is more effort but behaves like the model.
Specifically, the timer channel has a 1-element buffer like it always has,
but len(t.C) and cap(t.C) are special-cased to return 0 anyway, so user
code cannot see what's in the buffer except with a receive.
Stop/Reset lock out any stale sends and then clear any pending send
from the buffer.
Some programs will change behavior. For example:
package main
import "time"
func main() {
t := time.NewTimer(2 * time.Second)
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
if t.Reset(2*time.Second) != false {
panic("expected timer to have fired")
}
<-t.C
<-t.C
}
This program (from #11513) sleeps 3s after setting a 2s timer,
resets the timer, and expects Reset to return false: the Reset is too
late and the send has already occurred. It then expects to receive
two values: the one from before the Reset, and the one from after
the Reset.
With an unbuffered timer channel, it should be clear that no value
can be sent during the time.Sleep, so the time.Reset returns true,
indicating that the Reset stopped the timer from going off.
Then there is only one value to receive from t.C: the one from after the Reset.
In 2015, I used the above example as an argument against this change.
Note that a correct version of the program would be:
func main() {
t := time.NewTimer(2 * time.Second)
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
if !t.Reset(2*time.Second) {
<-t.C
}
<-t.C
}
This works with either semantics, by heeding t.Reset's result.
The change should not affect correct programs.
However, one way that the change would be visible is when programs
use len(t.C) (instead of a non-blocking receive) to poll whether the timer
has triggered already. We might legitimately worry about breaking such
programs.
In 2020, discussing #37196, Bryan Mills and I surveyed programs using
len on timer channels. These are exceedingly rare to start with; nearly all
the uses are buggy; and all the buggy programs would be fixed by the new
semantics. The details are at [1].
To further reduce the impact of this change, this CL adds a temporary
GODEBUG setting, which we didn't know about yet in 2015 and 2020.
Specifically, asynctimerchan=1 disables the change and is the default
for main programs in modules that use a Go version before 1.23.
We hope to be able to retire this setting after the minimum 2-year window.
Setting asynctimerchan=1 also disables the garbage collection change
from CL 568341, although users shouldn't need to know that since
it is not a semantically visible change (unless we have bugs!).
As an undocumented bonus that we do not officially support,
asynctimerchan=2 disables the channel buffer change but keeps
the garbage collection change. This may help while we are
shaking out bugs in either of them.
Fixes #37196.
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/issues/37196#issuecomment-641698749
Change-Id: I8925d3fb2b86b2ae87fd2acd055011cbf7bd5916
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/568341
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
From the beginning of Go, the time package has had a gotcha:
if you use a select on <-time.After(1*time.Minute), even if the select
finishes immediately because some other case is ready, the underlying
timer from time.After keeps running until the minute is over. This
pins the timer in the timer heap, which keeps it from being garbage
collected and in extreme cases also slows down timer operations.
The lack of garbage collection is the more important problem.
The docs for After warn against this scenario and suggest using
NewTimer with a call to Stop after the select instead, purely to work
around this garbage collection problem.
Oddly, the docs for NewTimer and NewTicker do not mention this
problem, but they have the same issue: they cannot be collected until
either they are Stopped or, in the case of Timer, the timer expires.
(Tickers repeat, so they never expire.) People have built up a shared
knowledge that timers and tickers need to defer t.Stop even though the
docs do not mention this (it is somewhat implied by the After docs).
This CL fixes the garbage collection problem, so that a timer that is
unreferenced can be GC'ed immediately, even if it is still running.
The approach is to only insert the timer into the heap when some
channel operation is blocked on it; the last channel operation to stop
using the timer takes it back out of the heap. When a timer's channel
is no longer referenced, there are no channel operations blocked on
it, so it's not in the heap, so it can be GC'ed immediately.
This CL adds an undocumented GODEBUG asynctimerchan=1
that will disable the change. The documentation happens in
the CL 568341.
Fixes #8898.
Fixes #61542.
Change-Id: Ieb303b6de1fb3527d3256135151a9e983f3c27e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/512355
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
|
Comparing BenchmarkStop against very old commits like
CL 13094043, I was very confused about how timers had
gotten almost 10X slower since 2013.
It turns out that CL 68060043 introduced a factor of 1000
in the benchmark cost, by counting batches of 1000 as 1 op
instead of 1000 ops, and timers have actually gotten
dramatically faster since 2013, with the addition of per-P
timer heaps and other optimizations.
This CL rewrites the benchmarks to use testing.PB directly,
so that the factor of 1000 disappears, and "/op" really means "/op".
In the few tests that need to run in batches for one reason or
another, add "1000" to the name to make clear that batches
are being run.
Change-Id: I27ed74d1e420934982e4205aad4f218cdfc42509
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/570495
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
The simulators are too slow.
Change-Id: I0aaf2304ad0881c74886ff3185c09614de2aae63
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/570236
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
|
The current implementation sets t.ts before adding t to ts;
that can cause inconsistencies with temporarily negative
ts.zombies values. Handle them gracefully, since we only
care about detecting very positive values.
Pending CL 564977 removes the race that sets t.ts early,
and then CL 569996 builds on top of that to make the count precise.
This CL just gets examples like the new test working sooner.
Change-Id: Ibe1aecc2554f83436f761f48e4050bd962982e4f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/569995
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Fixes #49315
Change-Id: I0887bad1059b25ae0749bfa1ed6ddccbecca7951
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/361074
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
|
|
TestTicker is sensitive to overloaded or slow systems, where a 20ms
ticker running for 10 ticks has a total run time out of the range
[110ms, 290ms]. To counter this flakiness, it tries five times to
get a successful result. This is insufficient--an overloaded test
machine can introduce more than 100ms of delay across the test.
Reduce the five attempts to two, but use a 1s ticker for 8 ticks
in the second attempt.
Updates #46474.
Updates #35692.
Change-Id: Ibd5187b00ccceeb981b652f2af9a1c3766357b78
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/339892
Trust: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Also sleep a bit each time it fails, in case the system is overloaded.
Fixes #37332
Change-Id: Iabf3d0a27b5834c1e2a87c826b6206146b4f62c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/313849
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
|
|
Introduce GOOS=ios for iOS systems. GOOS=ios matches "darwin"
build tag, like GOOS=android matches "linux" and GOOS=illumos
matches "solaris". Only ios/arm64 is supported (ios/amd64 is
not).
GOOS=ios and GOOS=darwin remain essentially the same at this
point. They will diverge at later time, to differentiate macOS
and iOS.
Uses of GOOS=="darwin" are changed to (GOOS=="darwin" || GOOS=="ios"),
except if it clearly means macOS (e.g. GOOS=="darwin" && GOARCH=="amd64"),
it remains GOOS=="darwin".
Updates #38485.
Change-Id: I4faacdc1008f42434599efb3c3ad90763a83b67c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/254740
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
|
This CL implements Ticker.Reset method in time package.
Benchmark:
name time/op
TickerReset-12 6.41µs ±10%
TickerResetNaive-12 95.7µs ±12%
Fixes #33184
Change-Id: I4cbd31796efa012b2a297bb342158f11a4a31fef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220424
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
This reverts CL 217362 (6e5652bebede2d53484a872f6d1dfeb498b0b50c.)
Reason for revert: Causing failures on arm64 bots. See #33184 for more info
Change-Id: I72ba40047e4138767d95aaa68842893c3508c52f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220638
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
This CL implements Ticker.Reset method in time package.
Benchmark:
name time/op
TickerReset-12 6.41µs ±10%
TickerResetNaive-12 95.7µs ±12%
Fixes #33184
Change-Id: I12c651f81e452541bcbbc748b45f038aae1f8dae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/217362
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
The darwin-arm64-correlium builder was failing the test consistently
at the old values. Give the ticks more time to let the test pass.
Updates #35692
Change-Id: Ibc636cd4db2595c82f4e8c6c822c3df4c2b7e0a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207839
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Take the opportunity of deflaking to make it take less time to run.
Updates #35537
Change-Id: I91ca8094fbe18fbfcd34dfda98da1592c9c82943
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207403
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Return early from deltimer, with false as the result,
to indicate that we couldn't delete the timer since its
timersBucket was nil(not set) in the first place.
That happens in such a case where a user created
the timer from a Ticker with:
t := time.Ticker{C: c}
The above usage skips the entire setup of assigning
the appropriate underlying runtimeTimer and timersBucket,
steps that are done for us by time.NewTicker.
CL 34784 introduced this bug with an optimization, by changing
stopTimer to retrieve the timersBucket from the timer itself
(which is unset with the mentioned usage pattern above),
whereas the old behavior relied on indexing
by goroutine ID into the global slice of runtime
timers, to retrieve the appropriate timersBucket.
Fixes #21874
Change-Id: Ie9ccc6bdee685414b2430dc4aa74ef618cea2b33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/63970
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Use per-P timers, so each P may work with its own timers.
This CL improves performance on multi-CPU systems
in the following cases:
- When serving high number of concurrent connections
with read/write deadlines set (for instance, highly loaded
net/http server).
- When using high number of concurrent timers. These timers
may be implicitly created via context.WithDeadline
or context.WithTimeout.
Production servers should usually set timeout on connections
and external requests in order to prevent from resource leakage.
See https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-complete-guide-to-golang-net-http-timeouts/
Below are relevant benchmark results for various GOMAXPROCS values
on linux/amd64:
context package:
name old time/op new time/op delta
WithTimeout/concurrency=40 4.92µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 1% +5.07% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
WithTimeout/concurrency=4000 6.03µs ± 1% 6.49µs ± 0% +7.63% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
WithTimeout/concurrency=400000 8.58µs ± 7% 9.02µs ± 4% +5.02% (p=0.019 n=10+10)
name old time/op new time/op delta
WithTimeout/concurrency=40-2 3.70µs ± 1% 2.78µs ± 4% -24.90% (p=0.000 n=8+9)
WithTimeout/concurrency=4000-2 4.49µs ± 4% 3.67µs ± 5% -18.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
WithTimeout/concurrency=400000-2 6.16µs ±10% 5.15µs ±13% -16.30% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old time/op new time/op delta
WithTimeout/concurrency=40-4 3.58µs ± 1% 2.64µs ± 2% -26.13% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
WithTimeout/concurrency=4000-4 4.17µs ± 0% 3.32µs ± 1% -20.36% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
WithTimeout/concurrency=400000-4 5.57µs ± 9% 4.83µs ±10% -13.27% (p=0.001 n=10+10)
time package:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AfterFunc 6.15ms ± 3% 6.07ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.133 n=10+9)
AfterFunc-2 3.43ms ± 1% 3.56ms ± 1% +3.91% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
AfterFunc-4 5.04ms ± 2% 2.36ms ± 0% -53.20% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
After 6.54ms ± 2% 6.49ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.393 n=10+10)
After-2 3.68ms ± 1% 3.87ms ± 0% +5.14% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
After-4 6.66ms ± 1% 2.87ms ± 1% -56.89% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Stop 698µs ± 2% 689µs ± 1% -1.26% (p=0.011 n=10+10)
Stop-2 729µs ± 2% 434µs ± 3% -40.49% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Stop-4 837µs ± 3% 333µs ± 2% -60.20% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
SimultaneousAfterFunc 694µs ± 1% 692µs ± 7% ~ (p=0.481 n=10+10)
SimultaneousAfterFunc-2 714µs ± 3% 569µs ± 2% -20.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
SimultaneousAfterFunc-4 782µs ± 2% 386µs ± 2% -50.67% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
StartStop 267µs ± 3% 274µs ± 0% +2.64% (p=0.000 n=8+9)
StartStop-2 238µs ± 2% 140µs ± 3% -40.95% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
StartStop-4 320µs ± 1% 125µs ± 1% -61.02% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Reset 75.0µs ± 1% 77.5µs ± 2% +3.38% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Reset-2 150µs ± 2% 40µs ± 5% -73.09% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Reset-4 226µs ± 1% 33µs ± 1% -85.42% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Sleep 857µs ± 6% 878µs ± 9% ~ (p=0.079 n=10+9)
Sleep-2 617µs ± 4% 585µs ± 2% -5.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Sleep-4 689µs ± 3% 465µs ± 4% -32.53% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Ticker 55.9ms ± 2% 55.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.971 n=10+10)
Ticker-2 28.7ms ± 2% 28.1ms ± 1% -2.06% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Ticker-4 14.6ms ± 0% 13.6ms ± 1% -6.80% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Fixes #15133
Change-Id: I6f4b09d2db8c5bec93146db6501b44dbfe5c0ac4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34784
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
|
The tree's pretty inconsistent about single space vs double space
after a period in documentation. Make it consistently a single space,
per earlier decisions. This means contributors won't be confused by
misleading precedence.
This CL doesn't use go/doc to parse. It only addresses // comments.
It was generated with:
$ perl -i -npe 's,^(\s*// .+[a-z]\.) +([A-Z]),$1 $2,' $(git grep -l -E '^\s*//(.+\.) +([A-Z])')
$ go test go/doc -update
Change-Id: Iccdb99c37c797ef1f804a94b22ba5ee4b500c4f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20022
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Day <djd@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Preparation was in CL 134570043.
This CL contains only the effect of 'hg mv src/pkg/* src'.
For more about the move, see golang.org/s/go14nopkg.
|
