| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Copying the loop variable is no longer necessary since Go 1.22.
Change-Id: Iebb21dac44a20ec200567f1d786f105a4ee4999d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/711640
Reviewed-by: Florian Lehner <lehner.florian86@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie76ebb556d635068342747f3f91dd7dc423df531
GitHub-Last-Rev: aea61fb3a054e6bd24f4684f90fb353d5682cd0b
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#73340
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/664677
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
This change switches isSending to be an atomic.Int32 instead of an
atomic.Uint8. The Int32 version is managed as a counter, which is
something that we couldn't do with Uint8 without adding a new intrinsic
which may not be available on all architectures.
That is, instead of only being able to support 8 concurrent timer
firings on the same timer because we only have 8 independent bits to set
for each concurrent timer firing, we can now have 2^31-1 concurrent
timer firings before running into any issues. Like the fact that each
bit-set was matched with a clear, here we match increments with
decrements to indicate that we're in the "sending on a channel" critical
section in the timer code, so we can report the correct result back on
Stop or Reset.
We choose an Int32 instead of a Uint32 because it's easier to check for
obviously bad values (negative values are always bad) and 2^31-1
concurrent timer firings should be enough for anyone.
Previously, we avoided anything bigger than a Uint8 because we could
pack it into some padding in the runtime.timer struct. But it turns out
that the type that actually matters, runtime.timeTimer, is exactly 96
bytes in size. This means its in the next size class up in the 112 byte
size class because of an allocation header. We thus have some free space
to work with. This change increases the size of this struct from 96
bytes to 104 bytes.
(I'm not sure if runtime.timer is often allocated directly, but if it
is, we get lucky in the same way too. It's exactly 80 bytes in size,
which means its in the 96-byte size class, leaving us with some space to
work with.)
Fixes #69969.
Related to #69880 and #69312.
Change-Id: I9fd59cb6a69365c62971d1f225490a65c58f3e77
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/621616
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
The Ticker Stop and Reset methods don't report a value,
so we don't need to track whether they are interrupting a send.
This includes a test that used to fail about 2% of the time on
my laptop when run under x/tools/cmd/stress.
Change-Id: Ic6d14b344594149dd3c24b37bbe4e42e83f9a9ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/620136
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
The timer code is careful to ensure that if stop/reset is called
while a timer is being run, we cancel the run. However, the code
failed to ensure that in that case stop/reset returned true,
meaning that the timer had been stopped. In the racing case
stop/reset could see that t.when had been set to zero,
and return false, even though the timer had not and never would fire.
Fix this by tracking whether a timer run is in progress,
and using that to reliably detect that the run was cancelled,
meaning that stop/reset should return true.
Fixes #69312
Change-Id: I78e870063eb96650638f12c056e32c931417c84a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611496
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Affected benchmark results, including new benchmark (some of these may
just be noise, of course):
AdjustTimers10000-12 797.7µ ± 2% 709.6µ ± 2% -11.04% (p=0.000 n=10)
TickerResetNaive-12 62.69n ± 1% 63.56n ± 1% +1.40% (p=0.018 n=10)
NowUnixMicro-12 29.95n ± 1% 30.25n ± 4% +1.00% (p=0.024 n=10)
ParseDuration-12 81.88n ± 0% 81.45n ± 0% -0.51% (p=0.006 n=10)
UnmarshalText-12 186.9n ± 1% 185.2n ± 1% -0.88% (p=0.006 n=10)
geomean 151.8n 151.2n -0.40%
Change-Id: I3ef8356249c5d703b314498e34ee8095093671c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/573455
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I56ca2d11637d60c6b0656fdc1d900a2384aba141
GitHub-Last-Rev: 686e02db77797fd81aafcde8ae40c85cee8dd817
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#66264
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/570916
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Classic operating system kernel mistake: if you start using
per-CPU data without disabling interrupts on the CPU,
and then an interrupt reschedules the process onto a different
CPU, now you're using the wrong CPU's per-CPU data.
The same thing happens in Go if you use per-M or per-P
data structures while not holding a lock nor using acquirem.
In the original timer.modify before CL 564977, I had been
very careful about this during the "unlock t; lock ts" dance,
only calling releasem after ts was locked. That made sure
we used the right ts. The refactoring of that code into its
own helper function in CL 564977 missed that nuance.
The code
ts := &getg().m.p.p.ptr().timers
ts.lock()
was now executing without holding any locks nor acquirem.
If the goroutine changed its M or P between deciding which
ts to use and actually locking that ts, the code would proceed
to add the timer t to some other P's timers. If the P was idle
by then, the scheduler could have already checked it for timers
and not notice the newly added timer when deciding when the
next timer should trigger.
The solution is to do what the old code correctly did, namely
acquirem before deciding which ts to use, rather than assume
getg().m.p won't change before ts.lock can complete.
This CL does that.
Before CL 564977,
stress ./time.test -test.run='ZeroTimer/impl=(func|cache)' -test.timeout=3m -test.count=20
ran without failure for over an hour on my laptop.
Starting in CL 564977, it consistently failed within a few minutes.
After this CL, it now runs without failure for over an hour again.
Fixes #66006.
Change-Id: Ib9e7ccaa0f22a326ce3fdef2b9a92f7f0bdafcbf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/571196
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
|
|
From the beginning of Go, the time package has had a gotcha:
if you use a select on <-time.After(1*time.Minute), even if the select
finishes immediately because some other case is ready, the underlying
timer from time.After keeps running until the minute is over. This
pins the timer in the timer heap, which keeps it from being garbage
collected and in extreme cases also slows down timer operations.
The lack of garbage collection is the more important problem.
The docs for After warn against this scenario and suggest using
NewTimer with a call to Stop after the select instead, purely to work
around this garbage collection problem.
Oddly, the docs for NewTimer and NewTicker do not mention this
problem, but they have the same issue: they cannot be collected until
either they are Stopped or, in the case of Timer, the timer expires.
(Tickers repeat, so they never expire.) People have built up a shared
knowledge that timers and tickers need to defer t.Stop even though the
docs do not mention this (it is somewhat implied by the After docs).
This CL fixes the garbage collection problem, so that a timer that is
unreferenced can be GC'ed immediately, even if it is still running.
The approach is to only insert the timer into the heap when some
channel operation is blocked on it; the last channel operation to stop
using the timer takes it back out of the heap. When a timer's channel
is no longer referenced, there are no channel operations blocked on
it, so it's not in the heap, so it can be GC'ed immediately.
This CL adds an undocumented GODEBUG asynctimerchan=1
that will disable the change. The documentation happens in
the CL 568341.
Fixes #8898.
Fixes #61542.
Change-Id: Ieb303b6de1fb3527d3256135151a9e983f3c27e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/512355
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
|
Comparing BenchmarkStop against very old commits like
CL 13094043, I was very confused about how timers had
gotten almost 10X slower since 2013.
It turns out that CL 68060043 introduced a factor of 1000
in the benchmark cost, by counting batches of 1000 as 1 op
instead of 1000 ops, and timers have actually gotten
dramatically faster since 2013, with the addition of per-P
timer heaps and other optimizations.
This CL rewrites the benchmarks to use testing.PB directly,
so that the factor of 1000 disappears, and "/op" really means "/op".
In the few tests that need to run in batches for one reason or
another, add "1000" to the name to make clear that batches
are being run.
Change-Id: I27ed74d1e420934982e4205aad4f218cdfc42509
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/570495
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I1dbd1c5aa26f458cdac7a3f0ca974254a069311f
GitHub-Last-Rev: da481ba7a9082a5fae5cc7c72821167d9879f54f
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#66219
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/569897
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
|
Many of the tests in package time are about proper manipulation
of the timer heap. But now NewTimer bypasses the timer heap
except when something is blocked on the associated channel.
Make the tests test the heap again by using AfterFunc instead of
NewTimer.
In particular, adds a non-chan version of TestZeroTimer, which
was flaky-broken and then fixed by CLs in the cleanup stack.
This new tests makes sure we notice if it breaks again.
Fixes #66006.
Change-Id: Ib59fc1b8b85ef5a21e72fe418c627c9b8b8a083a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/568255
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
|
When readying a goroutine, the scheduler typically places the readied
goroutine in pp.runnext, which will typically be the next goroutine to
run in the schedule.
In order to prevent a set of ping-pong goroutines from simply switching
back and forth via runnext and starving the rest of the run queue, a
goroutine scheduled via runnext shares a time slice (pp.schedtick) with
the previous goroutine.
sysmon detects "long-running goroutines", which really means Ps using
the same pp.schedtick for too long, and preempts them to allow the rest
of the run queue to run. Thus this avoids starvation via runnext.
However, wasm has no threads, and thus no sysmon. Without sysmon to
preempt, the possibility for starvation returns. Avoid this by disabling
runnext entirely on wasm. This means that readied goroutines always go
on the end of the run queue and thus cannot starve via runnext.
Note that this CL doesn't do anything about single long-running
goroutines. Without sysmon to preempt them, a single goroutine that
fails to yield will starve the run queue indefinitely.
For #65178.
Change-Id: I10859d088776125a2af8c9cd862b6e071da628b5
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-js-wasm,gotip-wasip1-wasm_wasmtime,gotip-wasip1-wasm_wazero
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/559798
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
GetQueuedCompletionStatusEx has a ~16ms timeout resolution. Use a
WaitCompletionPacket associated with the I/O Completion Port (IOCP)
and a high resolution timer so the IOCP is signaled on timer expiry,
therefore improving the GetQueuedCompletionStatusEx timeout resolution.
BenchmarkSleep from the time package shows an important improvement:
goos: windows
goarch: amd64
pkg: time
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10850H CPU @ 2.70GHz
│ old.txt │ new.txt │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
Sleep-12 1258.5µ ± 5% 250.7µ ± 1% -80.08% (p=0.000 n=20)
Fixes #44343.
Change-Id: I79fc09e34dddfc49e0e23c3d1d0603926c22a11d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/488675
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
This reverts CL 557437.
Reason for revert: Appears to have broken wasip1 builders.
For #65178.
Change-Id: I59c1a310eb56589c768536fe444c1efaf862f8b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/559237
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
|
|
When readying a goroutine, the scheduler typically places the readied
goroutine in pp.runnext, which will typically be the next goroutine to
run in the schedule.
In order to prevent a set of ping-pong goroutines from simply switching
back and forth via runnext and starving the rest of the run queue, a
goroutine scheduled via runnext shares a time slice (pp.schedtick) with
the previous goroutine.
sysmon detects "long-running goroutines", which really means Ps using
the same pp.schedtick for too long, and preempts them to allow the rest
of the run queue to run. Thus this avoids starvation via runnext.
However, wasm has no threads, and thus no sysmon. Without sysmon to
preempt, the possibility for starvation returns. Avoid this by disabling
runnext entirely on wasm. This means that readied goroutines always go
on the end of the run queue and thus cannot starve via runnext.
Note that this CL doesn't do anything about single long-running
goroutines. Without sysmon to preempt them, a single goroutine that
fails to yield will starve the run queue indefinitely.
For #65178.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-js-wasm,gotip-wasip1-wasm_wasmtime,gotip-wasip1-wasm_wazero
Change-Id: I7dffe1e72c6586474186b72f8068cff77b661eae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/557437
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
|
|
The test is skipped on wasm platforms for now, because it
successfully detects a starvation bug on those platforms.
For #65178.
Change-Id: I05d28f1c7be99fcab67ec4dfaa38f412e11fd3cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/557038
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
|
|
The previous upper bound was around 0.375 s, which is empirically
too short on a slow, heavily-loaded builder. Since the test doesn't
seem to depend on the actual duration in any meaningful way, let's
make it several orders of magnitude larger.
Fixes #61266.
Change-Id: I6dde5e174966ee385db67e3cb87334f463c7e597
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/508695
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
|
|
For #53821
Change-Id: I7e86dac34691f7752f68879ff379061f3435cd45
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/427139
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: xie cui <523516579@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
|
|
This test is observed to be flaky on the plan9-arm builder.
Skip it on that platform until it can be diagnosed and fixed.
For #50470
Change-Id: If626af426d856c377e00ac5baaca52899456556e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/375934
Trust: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
When the adjustTimers function removed a timer it assumed it was
sufficient to continue the heap traversal at that position.
However, in some cases a timer will be moved to an earlier
position in the heap. If that timer is timerModifiedEarlier,
that can leave timerModifiedEarliest not correctly representing
the earlier such timer.
Fix the problem by restarting the heap traversal at the earliest
changed position.
Fixes #47762
Change-Id: I152bbe62793ee40a680baf49967bcb89b1f94764
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/343882
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
This avoids a race when a new timerModifiedEarlier timer is created by
a different goroutine.
Fixes #47329
Change-Id: I6f6c87b4a9b5491b201c725c10bc98e23e0ed9d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/336432
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
The timerpMask optimization updates a mask of Ps (potentially)
containing timers in pidleget / pidleput. For correctness, it depends on
the assumption that new timers can only be added to a P's own heap.
addtimer violates this assumption if it is preempted after computing pp.
That G may then run on a different P, but adding a timer to the original
P's heap.
Avoid this by disabling preemption while pp is in use.
Other uses of doaddtimer should be OK:
* moveTimers: always moves to the current P's heap
* modtimer, cleantimers, addAdjustedTimers, runtimer: does not add net
new timers to the heap while locked
Fixes #44868
Change-Id: I4a5d080865e854931d0a3a09a51ca36879101d72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/300610
Trust: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
timer.when must always be positive. addtimer and modtimer already check
that it is non-negative; we expand it to include zero. Also upgrade from
pinning bad values to throwing, as these values shouldn't be possible to
pass (except as below).
timeSleep may overflow timer.nextwhen. This would previously have been
pinned by resetForSleep, now we fix it manually.
runOneTimer may overflow timer.when when adding timer.period. Detect
this and pin to maxWhen.
addtimer is now too strict to allow TestOverflowRuntimeTimer to test an
overflowed timer. Such a timer should not be possible; to help guard
against accidental inclusion siftup / siftdown will check timers as it
goes. This has been replaced with tests for period and sleep overflows.
Change-Id: I17f9739e27ebcb20d87945c635050316fb8e9226
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/274853
Trust: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Change the scheduler to treat expired timers with the same approach it
uses to steal runnable G's.
Previously the scheduler ignored timers on P's not marked for
preemption. That had the downside that any G's waiting on those expired
timers starved until the G running on their P completed or was
preempted. That could take as long as 20ms if sysmon was in a 10ms
wake up cycle.
In addition, a spinning P that ignored an expired timer and found no
other work would stop despite there being available work, missing the
opportunity for greater parallelism.
With this change the scheduler no longer ignores timers on
non-preemptable P's or relies on sysmon as a backstop to start threads
when timers expire. Instead it wakes an idle P, if needed, when
creating a new timer because it cannot predict if the current P will
have a scheduling opportunity before the new timer expires. The P it
wakes will determine how long to sleep and block on the netpoller for
the required time, potentially stealing the new timer when it wakes.
This change also eliminates a race between a spinning P transitioning
to idle concurrently with timer creation using the same pattern used
for submission of new goroutines in the same window.
Benchmark analysis:
CL 232199, which was included in Go 1.15 improved timer latency over Go
1.14 by allowing P's to steal timers from P's not marked for preemption.
The benchmarks added in this CL measure that improvement in the
ParallelTimerLatency benchmark seen below. However, Go 1.15 still relies
on sysmon to notice expired timers in some situations and sysmon can
sleep for up to 10ms before waking to check timers. This CL fixes that
shortcoming with modest regression on other benchmarks.
name \ avg-late-ns go14.time.bench go15.time.bench fix.time.bench
ParallelTimerLatency-8 17.3M ± 3% 7.9M ± 0% 0.2M ± 3%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=1-8 53.4k ±23% 50.7k ±31% 252.4k ± 9%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=2-8 204k ±14% 90k ±58% 188k ±12%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=3-8 1.17M ± 0% 0.11M ± 5% 0.11M ± 2%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=4-8 1.81M ±44% 0.10M ± 4% 0.10M ± 2%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=5-8 2.28M ±66% 0.09M ±13% 0.08M ±21%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=6-8 2.84M ±85% 0.07M ±15% 0.07M ±18%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=7-8 2.13M ±27% 0.06M ± 4% 0.06M ± 9%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=8-8 2.63M ± 6% 0.06M ±11% 0.06M ± 9%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=9-8 3.32M ±17% 0.06M ±16% 0.07M ±14%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=10-8 8.46M ±20% 4.37M ±21% 5.03M ±23%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=2ms/tickers-per-P=1-8 1.02M ± 1% 0.20M ± 2% 0.20M ± 2%
name \ max-late-ns go14.time.bench go15.time.bench fix.time.bench
ParallelTimerLatency-8 18.3M ± 1% 8.2M ± 0% 0.5M ±12%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=1-8 141k ±19% 127k ±19% 1129k ± 3%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=2-8 2.78M ± 4% 1.23M ±15% 1.26M ± 5%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=3-8 6.05M ± 5% 0.67M ±56% 0.81M ±33%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=4-8 7.93M ±20% 0.71M ±46% 0.76M ±41%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=5-8 9.41M ±30% 0.92M ±23% 0.81M ±44%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=6-8 10.8M ±42% 0.8M ±41% 0.8M ±30%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=7-8 9.62M ±24% 0.77M ±38% 0.88M ±27%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=8-8 10.6M ±10% 0.8M ±32% 0.7M ±27%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=9-8 11.9M ±36% 0.6M ±46% 0.8M ±38%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=300µs/tickers-per-P=10-8 36.8M ±21% 24.7M ±21% 27.5M ±16%
StaggeredTickerLatency/work-dur=2ms/tickers-per-P=1-8 2.12M ± 2% 1.02M ±11% 1.03M ± 7%
Other time benchmarks:
name \ time/op go14.time.bench go15.time.bench fix.time.bench
AfterFunc-8 137µs ± 4% 123µs ± 4% 131µs ± 2%
After-8 212µs ± 3% 195µs ± 4% 204µs ± 7%
Stop-8 165µs ± 6% 156µs ± 2% 151µs ±12%
SimultaneousAfterFunc-8 260µs ± 3% 248µs ± 3% 284µs ± 2%
StartStop-8 65.8µs ± 9% 64.4µs ± 7% 67.3µs ±15%
Reset-8 13.6µs ± 2% 9.6µs ± 2% 9.1µs ± 4%
Sleep-8 307µs ± 4% 306µs ± 3% 320µs ± 2%
Ticker-8 53.0µs ± 5% 54.5µs ± 5% 57.0µs ±11%
TickerReset-8 9.24µs ± 2% 9.51µs ± 3%
TickerResetNaive-8 149µs ± 5% 145µs ± 5%
Fixes #38860
Updates #25471
Updates #27707
Change-Id: If52680509b0f3b66dbd1d0c13fa574bd2d0bbd57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232298
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Found by running the go vet pass 'testinggoroutine' that
I started in CL 212920.
Change-Id: Ic9462fac85dbafc437fe4a323b886755a67a1efa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213097
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
The test is inherently slightly flaky, so repeat to reduce flakiness.
Fixes #35537
Change-Id: Id918d48d33c7d5e19c4f24df104adc7fbf3720f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207457
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Issues #10043, #15405, and #22660 appear to have been fixed, and
whatever tests I could run locally do succeed, so remove the skips.
Issue #7237 was closed in favor of #17906, so update its skip line.
Issue #7634 was closed as it had not appeared for over three years.
Re-enable it for now. An issue should be open if the test starts being
skipped again.
Change-Id: I67daade906744ed49223291035baddaad9f56dca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121735
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Found using go-simple.
Change-Id: I349e80a8c083688539bb4267564f02e3d7913da5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105195
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
This reverts commit 08f19bbde1b01227fdc2fa2d326e4029bb74dd96.
Reason for revert:
The changed transformation takes effect on a larger set
of code snippets than expected.
For example, this:
func foo() {
// Comment
bar()
}
becomes:
func foo() {
// Comment
bar()
}
This is an unintended consequence.
Change-Id: Ifca88d6267dab8a8170791f7205124712bf8ace8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81335
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
To improve readability when exported fields are removed,
forbid the printer from emitting an empty line before the first comment
in a const, var, or type block.
Also, when printing the "Has filtered or unexported fields." message,
add an empty line before it to separate the message from the struct
or interfact contents.
Before the change:
<<<
type NamedArg struct {
// Name is the name of the parameter placeholder.
//
// If empty, the ordinal position in the argument list will be
// used.
//
// Name must omit any symbol prefix.
Name string
// Value is the value of the parameter.
// It may be assigned the same value types as the query
// arguments.
Value interface{}
// contains filtered or unexported fields
}
>>>
After the change:
<<<
type NamedArg struct {
// Name is the name of the parameter placeholder.
//
// If empty, the ordinal position in the argument list will be
// used.
//
// Name must omit any symbol prefix.
Name string
// Value is the value of the parameter.
// It may be assigned the same value types as the query
// arguments.
Value interface{}
// contains filtered or unexported fields
}
>>>
Fixes #18264
Change-Id: I9fe17ca39cf92fcdfea55064bd2eaa784ce48c88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71990
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
|
|
Use per-P timers, so each P may work with its own timers.
This CL improves performance on multi-CPU systems
in the following cases:
- When serving high number of concurrent connections
with read/write deadlines set (for instance, highly loaded
net/http server).
- When using high number of concurrent timers. These timers
may be implicitly created via context.WithDeadline
or context.WithTimeout.
Production servers should usually set timeout on connections
and external requests in order to prevent from resource leakage.
See https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-complete-guide-to-golang-net-http-timeouts/
Below are relevant benchmark results for various GOMAXPROCS values
on linux/amd64:
context package:
name old time/op new time/op delta
WithTimeout/concurrency=40 4.92µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 1% +5.07% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
WithTimeout/concurrency=4000 6.03µs ± 1% 6.49µs ± 0% +7.63% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
WithTimeout/concurrency=400000 8.58µs ± 7% 9.02µs ± 4% +5.02% (p=0.019 n=10+10)
name old time/op new time/op delta
WithTimeout/concurrency=40-2 3.70µs ± 1% 2.78µs ± 4% -24.90% (p=0.000 n=8+9)
WithTimeout/concurrency=4000-2 4.49µs ± 4% 3.67µs ± 5% -18.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
WithTimeout/concurrency=400000-2 6.16µs ±10% 5.15µs ±13% -16.30% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old time/op new time/op delta
WithTimeout/concurrency=40-4 3.58µs ± 1% 2.64µs ± 2% -26.13% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
WithTimeout/concurrency=4000-4 4.17µs ± 0% 3.32µs ± 1% -20.36% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
WithTimeout/concurrency=400000-4 5.57µs ± 9% 4.83µs ±10% -13.27% (p=0.001 n=10+10)
time package:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AfterFunc 6.15ms ± 3% 6.07ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.133 n=10+9)
AfterFunc-2 3.43ms ± 1% 3.56ms ± 1% +3.91% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
AfterFunc-4 5.04ms ± 2% 2.36ms ± 0% -53.20% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
After 6.54ms ± 2% 6.49ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.393 n=10+10)
After-2 3.68ms ± 1% 3.87ms ± 0% +5.14% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
After-4 6.66ms ± 1% 2.87ms ± 1% -56.89% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Stop 698µs ± 2% 689µs ± 1% -1.26% (p=0.011 n=10+10)
Stop-2 729µs ± 2% 434µs ± 3% -40.49% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Stop-4 837µs ± 3% 333µs ± 2% -60.20% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
SimultaneousAfterFunc 694µs ± 1% 692µs ± 7% ~ (p=0.481 n=10+10)
SimultaneousAfterFunc-2 714µs ± 3% 569µs ± 2% -20.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
SimultaneousAfterFunc-4 782µs ± 2% 386µs ± 2% -50.67% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
StartStop 267µs ± 3% 274µs ± 0% +2.64% (p=0.000 n=8+9)
StartStop-2 238µs ± 2% 140µs ± 3% -40.95% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
StartStop-4 320µs ± 1% 125µs ± 1% -61.02% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Reset 75.0µs ± 1% 77.5µs ± 2% +3.38% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Reset-2 150µs ± 2% 40µs ± 5% -73.09% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Reset-4 226µs ± 1% 33µs ± 1% -85.42% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Sleep 857µs ± 6% 878µs ± 9% ~ (p=0.079 n=10+9)
Sleep-2 617µs ± 4% 585µs ± 2% -5.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Sleep-4 689µs ± 3% 465µs ± 4% -32.53% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Ticker 55.9ms ± 2% 55.9ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.971 n=10+10)
Ticker-2 28.7ms ± 2% 28.1ms ± 1% -2.06% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Ticker-4 14.6ms ± 0% 13.6ms ± 1% -6.80% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Fixes #15133
Change-Id: I6f4b09d2db8c5bec93146db6501b44dbfe5c0ac4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34784
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
|
Mostly unnecessary *testing.T arguments.
Found with github.com/mvdan/unparam.
Change-Id: Ifb955cb88f2ce8784ee4172f4f94d860fa36ae9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41691
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Ramp up the delay on subsequent attempts. Fast builders have the same delay.
Not a perfect fix, but should make it better. And this easy.
Fixes #9903 maybe
Fixes #10680 maybe
Change-Id: I967380c2cb8196e6da9a71116961229d37b36335
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9795
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
|
|
We shouldn't sort the slots array, as it is used each time the
test is run. Tests after the first should continue to use the
unsorted ordering.
Note that this doesn't fix the flaky test. Just a bug I saw
while investigating.
Change-Id: Ic03cca637829d569d50d3a2278d19410d4dedba9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9637
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
The TestAfterQueueing test is inherently flaky because it relies on
independent kernel threads being scheduled within the "delta" duration
of each other. Normally, delta is 100ms but during "short" testing,
it's reduced to 20ms.
On at least OpenBSD, the CPU scheduler operates in 10ms time slices,
so high system load (e.g., from running multiple Go unit tests in
parallel, as happens during all.bash) can occasionally cause >20ms
scheduling delays and result in test flaking. This manifests as issue
9903, which is the currently the most common OpenBSD flake.
To mitigate this delay, only reduce the delta duration to 20ms for the
first attempt during short testing. If this fails and the test is
reattempted, subsequent attempts instead use a full 100ms delta.
Fixes #9903.
Change-Id: I11bdfa939e5be915f67ffad8a8aef6ed8772159a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9510
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Roll forward of 54efdc596f7b. Better testing of the build on
darwin/amd64. There is still some variance between cmd/dist
and the Go tool for build tag handling.
Change-Id: I105669ae7f90c8c89b3839c04b182cff46be8dde
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6516
Run-TryBot: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 54efdc596f7b6c711e5d65d99f1c25a0ca3628f1.
Broken on darwin.
Change-Id: Ic74275f36d30975263340e2b4045226eae71b16a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6514
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
|
|
A future change will include an NSTimeZone hook so we can determine
the device's current time zone.
Change-Id: Ia4bd6b955e4cb720c518055541b66ff57a4dd303
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6511
Reviewed-by: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes #8721
LGTM=rsc
R=r, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/155620045
|
|
Preparation was in CL 134570043.
This CL contains only the effect of 'hg mv src/pkg/* src'.
For more about the move, see golang.org/s/go14nopkg.
|
