| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This fixes a possible panic introduced a few months ago by "image/jpeg:
add support for non-standard chroma subsampling ratios" (CL 738280).
Fixes #78368
Change-Id: I1f181582b7dc1e2955e3ec26c3aa24bc0f4159df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/760701
Auto-Submit: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@google.com>
|
|
On linux/amd64:
name old speed new speed delta
DecodeBaseline-8 76.4MB/s ± 0% 84.3MB/s ± 0% +10.38% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
DecodeProgressive-8 51.0MB/s ± 1% 52.6MB/s ± 0% +3.20% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Thanks to David Le Corfec for the suggestion.
Updates #24499
Change-Id: I749102ff0b50044dfd6a73172a1aa03f89ad97bd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/750900
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@google.com>
|
|
Add "flex mode" decoding for JPEG images with non-standard YCbCr
subsampling ratios that do not match the predefined YCbCrSubsampleRatio
values. This includes cases where:
1. Cb and Cr components have different sampling factors
2. The Y component does not have the maximum sampling factors
Such images were previously rejected with
"unsupported luma/chroma subsampling ratio"
but should be valid according to the JPEG specification:
https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf
Flex mode allocates a YCbCr444 backing buffer and manually expands
pixels according to each component's sampling factors relative to the
maximum. This approach mirrors the implementation in kovidgoyal/imaging.
Fixes #2362
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: image/jpeg
cpu: Apple M4 Max
│ old.txt │ new.txt │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
FDCT-16 576.9n ± 1% 578.9n ± 1% ~ (p=0.565 n=10)
IDCT-16 550.1n ± 0% 573.6n ± 3% +4.27% (p=0.000 n=10)
DecodeBaseline-16 520.6µ ± 4% 523.8µ ± 2% ~ (p=0.796 n=10)
DecodeProgressive-16 767.9µ ± 3% 747.0µ ± 10% ~ (p=0.123 n=10)
EncodeRGBA-16 7.869m ± 3% 8.485m ± 6% +7.82% (p=0.001 n=10)
EncodeYCbCr-16 8.761m ± 6% 8.021m ± 2% -8.45% (p=0.001 n=10)
geomean 143.5µ 143.8µ +0.18%
│ old.txt │ new.txt │
│ B/s │ B/s vs base │
DecodeBaseline-16 113.2Mi ± 4% 112.5Mi ± 2% ~ (p=0.796 n=10)
DecodeProgressive-16 76.75Mi ± 3% 78.90Mi ± 10% ~ (p=0.123 n=10)
EncodeRGBA-16 148.9Mi ± 3% 138.1Mi ± 7% -7.25% (p=0.001 n=10)
EncodeYCbCr-16 100.3Mi ± 7% 109.6Mi ± 2% +9.23% (p=0.001 n=10)
geomean 106.7Mi 107.7Mi +0.86%
│ old.txt │ new.txt │
│ B/op │ B/op vs base │
DecodeBaseline-16 61.55Ki ± 0% 61.55Ki ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
DecodeProgressive-16 253.6Ki ± 0% 253.6Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.124 n=10)
EncodeRGBA-16 4.438Ki ± 0% 4.438Ki ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
EncodeYCbCr-16 4.438Ki ± 0% 4.438Ki ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
geomean 23.55Ki 23.55Ki +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal
│ old.txt │ new.txt │
│ allocs/op │ allocs/op vs base │
DecodeBaseline-16 5.000 ± 0% 5.000 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
DecodeProgressive-16 13.00 ± 0% 13.00 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
EncodeRGBA-16 7.000 ± 0% 7.000 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
EncodeYCbCr-16 7.000 ± 0% 7.000 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
geomean 7.512 7.512 +0.00%
¹ all samples are equal
Co-authored-by: Kovid Goyal <kovidgoyal@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ic7353ce6a0b229cb6aa775bb05044d6bcded7ab2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/738280
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@google.com>
|
|
The fdct.go and idct.go files were derived from the MPEG-SSG and
JPEG-IJG reference code and therefore carry licenses specific to those
groups. Various license checkers flag these files as potentially
problematic. The code is also not terribly well documented.
This CL fixes the license problem by adding a new, from-scratch
implementation using a different algorithm. As a bonus, the new code
is both faster and more accurate than the old encumbered code.
On speed, the new code is up to 20% faster; benchmarks below.
On accuracy, in the set of blocks used in the test, we can measure
the number of output values that are off-by-one from the exact rounded answer.
The old FDCT was off in 8.6% of values; the new one is off in 2.5%.
The old IDCT was off in 1.4% of values; the new one is off in 1.2%.
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: image/jpeg
cpu: Apple M3 Pro
│ old │ new │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
FDCT-12 619.6n ± 3% 586.5n ± 1% -5.34% (p=0.000 n=10)
IDCT-12 752.4n ± 4% 628.0n ± 1% -16.54% (p=0.000 n=10)
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
cpu: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU @ 2.30GHz
│ old │ new │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
FDCT-16 1.817µ ± 0% 1.542µ ± 0% -15.11% (p=0.000 n=10)
IDCT-16 1.897µ ± 0% 1.514µ ± 0% -20.22% (p=0.000 n=10)
goos: linux
goarch: arm64
cpu: whatever gotip-linux-arm64 has
│ old │ new │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
FDCT-8 1.844µ ± 0% 1.847µ ± 0% +0.14% (p=0.000 n=10)
IDCT-8 2.127µ ± 0% 1.973µ ± 0% -7.26% (p=0.000 n=10)
Change-Id: Ie6d14103c8478ba5a779f234da84f345828eb925
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/705518
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@google.com>
|
|
The reference implementations slowFDCT and slowIDCT were not
rounding correctly, making the test not as good as it could be.
Before, the real implementations were required to always produce
values within ±2 of the reference; now, with no changes,
the real implementations produce values within ±1 of the (corrected)
reference.
Also tighten the test to return an error not just on a single value
exceeding tolerance but also on too many values at exactly that
tolerance.
Change-Id: I3dd6ca7582178fef972fb812d848f7a0158a6ed8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/705517
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
|
|
Preparation for a new unencumbered implementation of fdct.go and idct.go.
- Change benchmark not to allocate O(b.N) storage.
- Make tests point out where differences are.
- Parameterize differ tolerance.
Change-Id: Id5dfee40f86de894bad72dd6178ba61ec81ea2da
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/705516
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
|
|
Doing so is slightly more accurate than calculating at run time (because
of float64 rounding errors): https://go.dev/play/p/hrOzHDLjd5K
Having these more accurate values isn't necessary for tests to pass, but
it's helpful if doing printf-debugging or stepping through the code.
Change-Id: I07a65678936e4db05b11f9d8d952b32b2acd51a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/624716
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I2c68dde6e968e0643109161e52a76189e48b4d19
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/624715
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
|
|
Well-formed JPEG images will not have garbage bytes. However, for
corrupted JPEG images, the RST (restart) mechanism is specifically
designed so that a decoder can re-synchronize to an upcoming restartable
MCU (Minimum Coded Unit, e.g. 16x16 block of pixels) boundary and resume
decoding. Even if the resultant image isn't perfect, a 98%-good image is
better than a fatal error.
Every JPEG marker is encoded in two bytes, the first of which is 0xFF.
There are 8 possible RST markers, cycling as "0xFF 0xD0", "0xFF 0xD1",
..., "0xFF 0xD7". Suppose that, our decoder is expecting "0xFF 0xD1".
Before this commit, Go's image/jpeg package would accept only two
possible inputs: a well-formed "0xFF 0xD1" or one very specific pattern
of spec non-compliance, "0xFF 0x00 0xFF 0xD1".
After this commit, it is more lenient, similar to libjpeg's jdmarker.c's
next_marker function.
https://github.com/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo/blob/2dfe6c0fe9e18671105e94f7cbf044d4a1d157e6/jdmarker.c#L892-L935
The new testdata file was created by:
$ convert video-001.png a.ppm
$ cjpeg -restart 2 a.ppm > video-001.restart2.jpeg
$ rm a.ppm
Fixes #40130
Change-Id: Ic598a5f489f110d6bd63e0735200fb6acac3aca3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/580755
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Joedian Reid <joedian@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Id34936a115baaf61e4268582c6d9a2027494c385
GitHub-Last-Rev: 5fe455b7d24e3e3b871c8999c5bb534f3e1e3ab5
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#66244
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/570555
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I2839ecb091c4f0b30d0dcee708bf9e9a55e3672a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535196
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9bafc7aa4e20e7cd994b75e7576156ca68f4fc8b
GitHub-Last-Rev: e037f689bddd0ef03a6ad38982fe98b4c26aaede
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#61746
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/515855
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
|
|
Replaced t.Fatalf with t.Errorf for non-critical errors to footprint more failing test cases for better analysis of the error.
Change-Id: I6f51d21e37a4ddb95d239d8afed2154f3ef52d31
GitHub-Last-Rev: d56aa49bced80c80f1177ae4b9ce038265ead551
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#60524
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/499336
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
|
|
Decoder calls fill from readFull, ignore and readByte and
readByte did not check returned io.EOF.
This change moves io.EOF translation inside fill.
name old speed new speed delta
DecodeBaseline-8 67.4MB/s ± 0% 67.3MB/s ± 0% -0.20% (p=0.000 n=16+19)
DecodeProgressive-8 43.7MB/s ± 0% 43.6MB/s ± 0% -0.06% (p=0.013 n=17+19)
Fixes #56724
Change-Id: Ia0d5cc561f3c2050e25ec3f2b5e6866c3b4941c7
GitHub-Last-Rev: 470154373bc1452dffc5293d9a840e972749a76d
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#56863
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/452335
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao (INACTIVE; USE @golang.org INSTEAD) <nigeltao@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
The image/gif.FuzzDecode takes an excessive amount of time to run on various
builders - skip these in testing short mode. Likewise for image/jpeg and
image/png.
Fixes #55839
Change-Id: I1049d06b9dcbbc7dbc4f53d3c49b64e2254eabbd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/435175
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I0a51aa9e7800689c123ce3eaf74742a4641b7681
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/428261
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
magnitude
Also dump goroutines on failure.
The original bug report in #10413 reported a hang of “several
minutes”. An apparently-spurious failure was observed in
https://build.golang.org/log/e5ac3ce3fb7d04ec13e5bbfadea8bb5869a4dd1e,
with a delay of only 3.64s.
Moreover, if the test does fail due to a regression, we will want a
goroutine dump to diagnose where it got stuck. The current call to
t.Fatalf does not produce such a dump, so is not nearly as useful if
the failure only occasionally reproduces.
Updates #10413.
Change-Id: I6ab9d112f14f438a0c54e02ec95934627acdc64b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/408355
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yuval Pavel Zholkover <paulzhol@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
[This CL is part of a sequence implementing the proposal #51082.
The design doc is at https://go.dev/s/godocfmt-design.]
Run the updated gofmt, which reformats doc comments,
on the main repository. Vendored files are excluded.
For #51082.
Change-Id: I7332f099b60f716295fb34719c98c04eb1a85407
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/384268
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Adds simple fuzz targets to archive/tar, archive/zip, compress/gzip,
encoding/json, image/jpeg, image/gif, and image/png.
Second attempt, this time we don't use the archives in testdata when
fuzzing archive/tar, since those are rather memory intensive, and
were crashing a number of builders.
Change-Id: I4828d64fa4763c0d8c980392a6578e4dfd956e13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/378174
Trust: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
This reverts CL 352109.
Reason for revert: causing OOM failures on several builders, and may cause OOMs for end users with small machines as well.
Change-Id: I58308d09919969d5a6512ee5cee6aa5c4af6769b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/377934
Trust: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Trust: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
|
|
Adds simple fuzz targets to archive/tar, archive/zip, compress/gzip,
encoding/json, image/jpeg, image/gif, and image/png.
Change-Id: Ide1a8de88a9421e786eeeaea3bb93f41e0bae347
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/352109
Trust: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Trust: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic7701a9e4635fe1a331c9a1df776ed580759eb9d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/268758
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Trust: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
Trust: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Trust: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
As part of #42026, these helpers from io/ioutil were moved to os.
(ioutil.TempFile and TempDir became os.CreateTemp and MkdirTemp.)
Update the Go tree to use the preferred names.
As usual, code compiled with the Go 1.4 bootstrap toolchain
and code vendored from other sources is excluded.
ReadDir changes are in a separate CL, because they are not a
simple search and replace.
For #42026.
Change-Id: If318df0216d57e95ea0c4093b89f65e5b0ababb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/266365
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
The old ioutil references are still valid, but update our code
to reflect best practices and get used to the new locations.
Code compiled with the bootstrap toolchain
(cmd/asm, cmd/dist, cmd/compile, debug/elf)
must remain Go 1.4-compatible and is excluded.
Also excluded vendored code.
For #41190.
Change-Id: I6d86f2bf7bc37a9d904b6cee3fe0c7af6d94d5b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/263142
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
|
|
Fixes #28717
Change-Id: I0a1e4ef1583fff89b6f46ef647fb6e4499bdf999
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230122
Run-TryBot: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
Before -
$gotip build -gcflags="-d=ssa/check_bce/debug=1" fdct.go idct.go
./fdct.go:89:10: Found IsInBounds
./fdct.go:90:10: Found IsInBounds
./fdct.go:91:10: Found IsInBounds
./fdct.go:92:10: Found IsInBounds
./fdct.go:93:10: Found IsInBounds
./fdct.go:94:10: Found IsInBounds
./fdct.go:95:10: Found IsInBounds
./fdct.go:96:10: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:77:9: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:77:27: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:77:45: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:78:7: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:78:25: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:78:43: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:78:61: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:79:13: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:92:13: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:93:12: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:94:12: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:95:12: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:97:12: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:98:12: Found IsInBounds
./idct.go:99:12: Found IsInBounds
After -
$gotip build -gcflags="-d=ssa/check_bce/debug=1" fdct.go idct.go
./fdct.go:90:9: Found IsSliceInBounds
./idct.go:76:11: Found IsSliceInBounds
./idct.go:145:11: Found IsSliceInBounds
name old time/op new time/op delta
FDCT-4 1.85µs ± 2% 1.74µs ± 1% -5.95% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
IDCT-4 1.94µs ± 2% 1.89µs ± 1% -2.67% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
DecodeBaseline-4 1.45ms ± 2% 1.46ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.156 n=9+10)
DecodeProgressive-4 2.21ms ± 1% 2.21ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.796 n=10+10)
EncodeRGBA-4 24.9ms ± 1% 25.0ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.075 n=10+10)
EncodeYCbCr-4 26.1ms ± 1% 26.2ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.573 n=8+10)
name old speed new speed delta
DecodeBaseline-4 42.5MB/s ± 2% 42.4MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.162 n=9+10)
DecodeProgressive-4 27.9MB/s ± 1% 27.9MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.796 n=10+10)
EncodeRGBA-4 49.4MB/s ± 1% 49.1MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.066 n=10+10)
EncodeYCbCr-4 35.3MB/s ± 1% 35.2MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.586 n=8+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
DecodeBaseline-4 63.0kB ± 0% 63.0kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
DecodeProgressive-4 260kB ± 0% 260kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
EncodeRGBA-4 4.40kB ± 0% 4.40kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
EncodeYCbCr-4 4.40kB ± 0% 4.40kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
DecodeBaseline-4 5.00 ± 0% 5.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
DecodeProgressive-4 13.0 ± 0% 13.0 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
EncodeRGBA-4 4.00 ± 0% 4.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
EncodeYCbCr-4 4.00 ± 0% 4.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Updates #24499
Change-Id: I6828d077b851817503a7c1a08235763f81bdadf9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/167417
Run-TryBot: Agniva De Sarker <agniva.quicksilver@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Id431969e42f0d9bd28bbf163d10378a6de2416f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141999
Run-TryBot: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie801fe6a2883d79229ee2955e26948c1b4964802
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122496
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
|
Each URL was manually verified to ensure it did not serve up incorrect
content.
Change-Id: I4dc846227af95a73ee9a3074d0c379ff0fa955df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115798
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Also add some b.ReportAllocs calls to other image codec benchmarks.
Change-Id: I0f055dc76bffb66329c621a5f1ccd239f0cdd30b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68390
Reviewed-by: Jed Denlea <jed@fastly.com>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
|
|
Previously, the package did not distinguish between baseline and
extended sequential images. Both are non-progressive images, but the Th
range differs between the two, as per Annex B of
https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf
Extended sequential images are often emitted by the Guetzli encoder.
Fixes #19913
Change-Id: I3d0f9e16d5d374ee1c65e3a8fb87519de61cff94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41831
Reviewed-by: David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
|
|
The existing implementation falls back to using image.At()
for each pixel when encoding an *image.YCbCr which is
inefficient and causes many memory allocations.
This change makes the jpeg encoder directly read Y, Cb, and Cr
pixel values.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkEncodeYCbCr-4 43990846 24201148 -44.99%
benchmark old MB/s new MB/s speedup
BenchmarkEncodeYCbCr-4 20.95 38.08 1.82x
Fixes #18487
Change-Id: Iaf2ebc646997e3e1fffa5335f1b0d642e15bd453
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34773
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes #14522.
As I said on that issue:
----
This is a progressive JPEG image. There are two dimensions of
progressivity: spectral selection (variables zs and ze in scan.go,
ranging in [0, 63]) and successive approximation (variables ah and al in
scan.go, ranging in [0, 8), from LSB to MSB, although ah=0 implicitly
means ah=8).
For this particular image, there are three components, and the SOS
markers contain this progression:
zs, ze, ah, al: 0 0 0 0 components: 0, 1, 2
zs, ze, ah, al: 1 63 0 0 components: 1
zs, ze, ah, al: 1 63 0 0 components: 2
zs, ze, ah, al: 1 63 0 2 components: 0
zs, ze, ah, al: 1 10 2 1 components: 0
zs, ze, ah, al: 11 63 2 1 components: 0
zs, ze, ah, al: 1 10 1 0 components: 0
The combination of all of these is complete (i.e. spectra 0 to 63 and
bits 8 exclusive to 0) for components 1 and 2, but it is incomplete for
component 0 (the luma component). In particular, there is no data for
component 0, spectra 11 to 63 and bits 1 exclusive to 0.
The image/jpeg code, as of Go 1.6, waits until both dimensions are
complete before performing the de-quantization, IDCT and copy to an
*image.YCbCr. This is the "if zigEnd != blockSize-1 || al != 0 { ...
continue }" code and associated commentary in scan.go.
Almost all progressive JPEG images end up complete in both dimensions
for all components, but this particular image is incomplete for
component 0, so the Go code never writes anything to the Y values of the
resultant *image.YCbCr, which is why the broken output is so dark (but
still looks recognizable in terms of red and blue hues).
My reading of the ITU T.81 JPEG specification (Annex G) doesn't
explicitly say that this is a valid image, but it also doesn't rule it
out.
In any case, the fix is, for progressive JPEG images, to always
reconstruct the decoded blocks (by performing the de-quantization, IDCT
and copy to an *image.YCbCr), regardless of whether or not they end up
complete. Note that, in Go, the jpeg.Decode function does not return
until the entire image is decoded, so we still only want to reconstruct
each block once, not once per SOS (Start Of Scan) marker.
----
A test image was also added, based on video-001.progressive.jpeg. When
decoding that image, inserting a
println("nComp, zs, ze, ah, al:", nComp, zigStart, zigEnd, ah, al)
into decoder.processSOS in scan.go prints:
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 3 0 0 0 1
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 5 0 2
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 0 1
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 0 1
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 6 63 0 2
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 2 1
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 3 0 0 1 0
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 1 0
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 1 0
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 1 0
In other words, video-001.progressive.jpeg contains 10 different scans.
This little program below drops half of them (remembering to keep the
"\xff\xd9" End of Image marker):
----
package main
import (
"bytes"
"io/ioutil"
"log"
)
func main() {
sos := []byte{0xff, 0xda}
eoi := []byte{0xff, 0xd9}
src, err := ioutil.ReadFile("video-001.progressive.jpeg")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
b := bytes.Split(src, sos)
println(len(b)) // Prints 11.
dst := bytes.Join(b[:5], sos)
dst = append(dst, eoi...)
if err := ioutil.WriteFile("video-001.progressive.truncated.jpeg", dst, 0666); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
}
----
The video-001.progressive.truncated.jpeg was converted to png via
libjpeg and ImageMagick:
djpeg -nosmooth video-001.progressive.truncated.jpeg > tmp.tga
convert tmp.tga video-001.progressive.truncated.png
rm tmp.tga
Change-Id: I72b20cd4fb6746d36d8d4d587f891fb3bc641f84
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21062
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
This rolls back most of golang.org/cl/8841, aka 2f98bac310, and makes a
different fix. It keeps the TestTruncatedSOSDataDoesntPanic test
introduced by that other CL, which obviously still passes after this CL.
Fixes #11650, a regression (introduced by cl/8841) from Go 1.4.
The original cl/8841 changed the image/jpeg not to panic on an input
given in #10387. We still do not panic on that input, after this CL.
I have a corpus of over 160,000 JPEG images, a sample of a web crawl.
The image/jpeg code ran happily over that whole corpus both before and
after this CL, although that corpus clearly didn't catch the regression
in the first place.
This code was otherwise tested manually. I don't think that it's trivial
to synthesize a JPEG input that happens to run out of Huffman data at
just the right place. The test image attached to #11650 obviously has
that property, but I don't think we can simply add that test image to
the repository: it's 227KiB, and I don't know its copyright status.
I also looked back over the issue tracker for problematic JPEGs that
people have filed. The Go code, after this CL, is still happy on these
files in my directory:
issue2362a.jpeg
issue3916.jpeg
issue3976.jpeg
issue4084.jpeg
issue4259.jpeg
issue4291.jpeg
issue4337.jpeg
issue4500.jpeg
issue4705.jpeg
issue4975.jpeg
issue5112.jpeg
issue6767.jpeg
issue9888.jpeg
issue10133.jpeg
issue10357.jpeg
issue10447.jpeg
issue11648.jpeg
issue11650.jpeg
There were other images attached in the issue tracker that aren't
actually valid JPEGs. They failed both before and after this CL:
broken-issue2362b.jpeg
broken-issue6450.jpeg
broken-issue8693.jpeg
broken-issue10154.jpeg
broken-issue10387.jpeg
broken-issue10388.jpeg
broken-issue10389.jpeg
broken-issue10413.jpeg
In summary, this CL fixes #11650 and, after some automated and manual
testing, I don't think introduces new regressions.
Change-Id: I30b67036e9b087f3051d57dac7ea05fb4fa36f66
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12163
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
While we're at it, move some misplaced comment blocks around.
Change-Id: I1847d7f1ca1dbb8e5de737203c4ed6c66e112508
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10188
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
|
MiB.
Fixes #10531
Change-Id: I9eece86837c3df2b1f7df315d5ec94bd3ede3eec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9238
Run-TryBot: Nigel Tao <nigeltao@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
|
|
Fixes #10413
Change-Id: I7a4ecd042c40f786ea7406c670d561b1c1179bf0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8998
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
call unreadByteStuffedByte.
If ensureNBits was due to an io.EOF that was translated to
jpeg.errShortHuffmanData, then we may have read no bytes, so there is no
byte-stuffed-byte to unread.
Fixes #10387
Change-Id: I39a3842590c6cef2aa48943288d52f603338b44d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8841
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes #10389
Change-Id: Id1c687122751f9317041d9e425d03b267a26c6de
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8681
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
The imageutil.DrawYCbCr function lives in an internal package because it
is needed by both the image/draw and image/jpeg packages, but it doesn't
seem right for one of those two to depend on the other.
It could eventually go into the image package, but that would require
committing to an API for the rest of Go 1.x.
Change-Id: I7b12555c970d86409365e99eef9360702aaffa30
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7925
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes #10154
Change-Id: Ibb8ea9bcf512e7639c57a6f17afbe4495fa329cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7494
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
|
|
The testdata was generated by:
convert video-001.png tmp1.tga
cjpeg -quality 100 -sample 2x2,1x2,1x2 tmp1.tga > video-001.221212.jpeg
djpeg -nosmooth -targa video-001.221212.jpeg > tmp2.tga
convert tmp2.tga video-001.221212.png
rm tmp1.tga tmp2.tga
Change-Id: Ica241dfc19b3eb47ade150bf0432373c6006c38a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7264
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
The testdata was generated by:
convert video-001.png tmp1.tga
cjpeg -rgb -sample 2x2,1x1,1x1 tmp1.tga > video-001.rgb.jpeg
djpeg -nosmooth -targa video-001.rgb.jpeg > tmp2.tga
convert tmp2.tga video-001.rgb.png
rm tmp1.tga tmp2.tga
Change-Id: I5da0591b9005c1c75e807311f157d385e0e20a38
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6910
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I83de9d83708edc8d196bbcfdc7d2ba7ffaff50d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6586
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
components.
This fixes decoding JPEG images where the component selector is 0. Such
images are rare, but not impossible.
Change-Id: I6d221bce01cce8cc0440e117543233371782ca22
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6421
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
encountering unknown markers.
Change-Id: Ica86013308d69da2f5b486119235ff693135b2f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6393
Reviewed-by: David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
|
|
The test data was generated by:
convert video-001.png tmp.tga
cjpeg -quality 50 -sample 4x2,1x1,1x1 tmp.tga > video-001.q50.410.jpeg
cjpeg -quality 50 -sample 4x1,1x1,1x1 tmp.tga > video-001.q50.411.jpeg
cjpeg -quality 50 -sample 4x2,1x1,1x1 -progressive tmp.tga > video-001.q50.410.progressive.jpeg
cjpeg -quality 50 -sample 4x1,1x1,1x1 -progressive tmp.tga > video-001.q50.411.progressive.jpeg
rm tmp.tga
Change-Id: I5570389c462360f98c3160f3c6963d9466d511de
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/6041
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
frames.
Fixes #9888.
Change-Id: I60f1d843e72e1b7bc77ab984f149c9ddb5258a06
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5251
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Idd66f9c3c9eaa4ff1f950fb90e4800dc625dec08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4916
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
|
|
The new testdata was created by:
convert video-001.png -colorspace cmyk video-001.cmyk.jpeg
video-001.cmyk.jpeg was then converted back to video-001.cmyk.png via
the GIMP. ImageMagick (convert) wasn't used for this second conversion
because IM's default color profiles complicates things.
Fixes #4500.
Change-Id: Ibf533f6a6c7e76883acc493ce3a4289d7875df3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/4801
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
|