aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/codegen/arithmetic.go
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKeith Randall <khr@golang.org>2024-03-02 19:22:07 -0800
committerKeith Randall <khr@golang.org>2024-03-12 19:38:41 +0000
commita46ecdca36b2359e7496c6d694703a9a9706d760 (patch)
tree1d0414e3df9725bd9d2a8ef456721affa75669ba /test/codegen/arithmetic.go
parent34d28ba932cc26af9ae6c0233f4967a9b7cd94c2 (diff)
downloadgo-a46ecdca36b2359e7496c6d694703a9a9706d760.tar.xz
cmd/compile: fix sign/zero-extension removal
When an opcode generates a known high bit state (typically, a sub-word operation that zeros the high bits), we can remove any subsequent extension operation that would be a no-op. x = (OP ...) y = (ZeroExt32to64 x) If OP zeros the high 32 bits, then we can replace y with x, as the zero extension doesn't do anything. However, x in this situation normally has a sub-word-sized type. The semantics of values in registers is typically that the high bits beyond the value's type size are junk. So although the opcode generating x *currently* zeros the high bits, after x is rewritten to another opcode it may not - rewrites of sub-word-sized values can trash the high bits. To fix, move the extension-removing rules to late lower. That ensures that their arguments won't be rewritten to change their high bits. I am also worried about spilling and restoring. Spilling and restoring doesn't preserve the high bits, but instead sets them to a known value (often 0, but in some cases it could be sign-extended). I am unable to come up with a case that would cause a problem here, so leaving for another time. Fixes #66066 Change-Id: I3b5c091b3b3278ccbb7f11beda8b56f4b6d3fde7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/568616 Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com> LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'test/codegen/arithmetic.go')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions