all: be more idiomatic when documenting boolean return values.

Phrases like "returns whether or not the image is opaque" could be
describing what the function does (it always returns, regardless of
the opacity) or what it returns (a boolean indicating the opacity).
Even when the "or not" is missing, the phrasing is bizarre.

Go with "reports whether", which is still clunky but at least makes
it clear we're talking about the return value.

These were edited by hand. A few were cleaned up in other ways.

R=golang-dev, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/11699043

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/src/pkg/text/template/exec.go b/src/pkg/text/template/exec.go
index 8ec8174a16..b227a3534f 100644
--- a/src/pkg/text/template/exec.go
+++ b/src/pkg/text/template/exec.go
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ func (s *state) walkIfOrWith(typ parse.NodeType, dot reflect.Value, pipe *parse.
 	}
 }
 
-// isTrue returns whether the value is 'true', in the sense of not the zero of its type,
+// isTrue reports whether the value is 'true', in the sense of not the zero of its type,
 // and whether the value has a meaningful truth value.
 func isTrue(val reflect.Value) (truth, ok bool) {
 	if !val.IsValid() {