cmd/compile: fix early deadcode with label statement

CL 517775 moved early deadcode into unified writer. with new way to
handle dead code with label statement involved: any statements after
terminating statement will be considered dead until next label
statement.

However, this is not safe, because code after label statement may still
refer to dead statements between terminating and label statement.

It's only safe to remove statements after terminating *and* label one.

Fixes #65593

Change-Id: Idb630165240931fad50789304a9e4535f51f56e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/565596
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/writer.go b/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/writer.go
index 641374e03c..87c54b9769 100644
--- a/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/writer.go
+++ b/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/writer.go
@@ -1217,10 +1217,17 @@ func (w *writer) stmt(stmt syntax.Stmt) {
 func (w *writer) stmts(stmts []syntax.Stmt) {
 	dead := false
 	w.Sync(pkgbits.SyncStmts)
-	for _, stmt := range stmts {
-		if dead {
-			// Any statements after a terminating statement are safe to
-			// omit, at least until the next labeled statement.
+	var lastLabel = -1
+	for i, stmt := range stmts {
+		if _, ok := stmt.(*syntax.LabeledStmt); ok {
+			lastLabel = i
+		}
+	}
+	for i, stmt := range stmts {
+		if dead && i > lastLabel {
+			// Any statements after a terminating and last label statement are safe to omit.
+			// Otherwise, code after label statement may refer to dead stmts between terminating
+			// and label statement, see issue #65593.
 			if _, ok := stmt.(*syntax.LabeledStmt); !ok {
 				continue
 			}