aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/reader.go
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKeith Randall <khr@golang.org>2026-03-04 16:07:30 -0800
committerGopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>2026-03-06 10:28:08 -0800
commite7a09d1ffb8745350cb9b5ba9c495b5e066e09ab (patch)
tree194cbd50f4983d928b0893a007c3107df29b14c9 /src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/reader.go
parent50d988e4e037d9d41ac223a62706dfea47a100e4 (diff)
downloadgo-e7a09d1ffb8745350cb9b5ba9c495b5e066e09ab.tar.xz
cmd/compile: use tail calls for wrappers for embedded interfaces
type I interface { foo() } type S struct { I } Because I is embedded in S, S needs a foo method. We generate a wrapper function to implement (*S).foo. It just loads the embedded field I out of S and calls foo on it. When the thing in S.I itself needs a wrapper, then we have a wrapper calling another wrapper. This can continue, leaving a potentially long sequence of wrappers on the stack. When we then call runtime.Callers or friends, we have to walk an unbounded number of frames to find a bounded number of non-wrapper frames. This really happens, for instance with I = context.Context, S = context.ValueCtx, and runtime.Callers = pprof sample (for any of context.Context's methods). To fix, make the interface call in the wrapper a tail call. That way, the number of wrapper frames on the stack does not increase when there are lots of wrappers happening. Fixes #75764 Fixes #77781 Change-Id: I03b1731159d9218c7f14f72ecbbac822d6a6bb87 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/751465 Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com> LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/reader.go')
-rw-r--r--src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/reader.go7
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/reader.go b/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/reader.go
index 7f82cfc6ba..a9ed77409b 100644
--- a/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/reader.go
+++ b/src/cmd/compile/internal/noder/reader.go
@@ -3996,8 +3996,11 @@ func addTailCall(pos src.XPos, fn *ir.Func, recv ir.Node, method *types.Field) {
call := typecheck.Call(pos, dot, args, method.Type.IsVariadic()).(*ir.CallExpr)
if recv.Type() != nil && recv.Type().IsPtr() && method.Type.Recv().Type.IsPtr() &&
- method.Embedded != 0 && !types.IsInterfaceMethod(method.Type) &&
- !unifiedHaveInlineBody(ir.MethodExprName(dot).Func) &&
+ method.Embedded != 0 &&
+ (types.IsInterfaceMethod(method.Type) && base.Ctxt.Arch.Name != "wasm" ||
+ !types.IsInterfaceMethod(method.Type) && !unifiedHaveInlineBody(ir.MethodExprName(dot).Func)) &&
+ // TODO: implement wasm indirect tail calls
+ // TODO: do we need the ppc64le/dynlink restriction for interface tail calls?
!(base.Ctxt.Arch.Name == "ppc64le" && base.Ctxt.Flag_dynlink) {
if base.Debug.TailCall != 0 {
base.WarnfAt(fn.Nname.Type().Recv().Type.Elem().Pos(), "tail call emitted for the method %v wrapper", method.Nname)