aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README.md
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
6 daysall: fix broken links and typosShulhan
2026-03-18README: update arbiter from rsc@ to austin@Austin Clements
Change-Id: I4fc5ffa54a5a10fe76d76193ead6be0c271b2110 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/756500 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2024-12-16README,CONTRIBUTING: update linksOleksandr Redko
Use the new public domain go.dev over golang.org. Use secure links. Change-Id: I0384efeb88e20a67375c48fe424b5b5f107d0830 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/636559 Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
2024-03-15README.md: mention GODEBUG settingsRuss Cox
Change-Id: Icf2c7f06a2a3a391f535738b5014375bd37bbc0e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/572015 Commit-Queue: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2023-06-28README: add Go architectsRuss Cox
Add "Go architects" to handle cases where proposal review cannot identify a consensus in the issue discussion. The proposal review group reviews proposals weekly to help them through the process. (See https://github.com/golang/proposal#proposal-review.) When a proposal does not have a clear outcome but a decision must be made, the proposal review group also works to reach consensus among themselves on the answer; that is, they decide the outcome. (See https://github.com/golang/proposal#consensus-and-disagreement.) Reviewing proposals and deciding contended proposals are two different activities that need not be done by exactly the same set of people. Historically there was significant overlap, and there will likely always be some overlap, but as time goes on it seems likely that we may want to formally separate the two activities. In particular, we may want to add more reviewers, to help the process move along and scale, but still leave truly contended decisions (which are fairly rare) to a smaller group. This change to README.md implements that idea. Fixes golang/go#33528. Change-Id: Iaec6d7fc4ff588f057eb5db84a9de548ec4c2b8d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/506565 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Bypass: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2023-06-21design/README: add declined as obsoleteRuss Cox
Change-Id: Ie474906725459bb070e3e9ca6b98b4085901de88 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/504943 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> TryBot-Bypass: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2023-01-02README: fix stale link to proposal projectM Hickford
Change-Id: I9bf749b45e8b7cef68097f6c94041da19c1ca54c GitHub-Last-Rev: 03836c7e7ea217f37597662e4f8f82b37ac6d120 GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/proposal#49 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/460195 Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
2022-01-21README: clarify that all API changes are substantial/notableRuss Cox
Change-Id: I85e10a664dc91d526d84f76f3c8e00ab221567c5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/365714 Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
2021-10-06README.md: document declined as infeasibleRuss Cox
Change-Id: Id64bf406cfc39e9d0fa1114e7b0614b1cdaef94f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/354449 Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2021-07-20README.md: document declined as duplicate and declined as retractedRuss Cox
Change-Id: I60383587af4b4bce4cbbdd11f5d992d752969c50 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/335970 Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2021-04-11README.md: link to go2 templateSean Liao
Change-Id: I9100ea7b6221206e8a40717086334d91f87a617e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/309209 Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
2021-01-08README.md: wording correctionIan Lance Taylor
Change-Id: I17f623f78f25c4599e49adef21afd12a24683a4b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/281514 Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2021-01-06README.md: explain proposal project columnsRuss Cox
Change-Id: I8adc674cd9b0df5a721467d21f4d3766a72d023c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/282093 Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2019-01-22README: mention current Go 2 processIan Lance Taylor
Updates golang/go#29860 Change-Id: I442ed5d8d5bfe26abdfc93059b1c57b09fb00c8a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/158843 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-20proposal: streamline process description in READMERuss Cox
The old doc takes too long to get to explaining the process, and it spends too much text on it. There's no "at a glance" explanation of the process. Add one. Also explain the proposal review meetings. Change-Id: Ib74cff06904f990dd8abcb4c3cc1097d7656f3b5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/136515 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
2018-06-12README: use HTTPS for *.golang.org linksSuriyaa Sundararuban
Change-Id: I65159f31896f1875174bcd02e753d239bd4e18d6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/118177 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2017-10-05fill: Emacs script to add line breaks between sentencesAustin Clements
This makes fill-paragraph (M-q) in Emacs implement the desired format for proposal documents. Change-Id: I236f3f68ca40255ebab2382a117fb283cbb3908b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/67930 Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2016-09-16proposal: without clear agreement, the arbiter decidesAndrew Gerrand
This is not a policy change, but rather a clarification of the existing wording. Fixes golang/go#17129 Change-Id: Ie9877b10ae3eed8ad5e5763d35e48d94c6f8f523 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29335 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Jaana Burcu Dogan <jbd@google.com>
2016-09-16proposal: bestow arbitership upon rscAndrew Gerrand
Change-Id: Ifd805448f7d6f2ffa97bb9a5c2ab1387f96018dc Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29330 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-10-01README: say how to commit to the proposal repositoryAustin Clements
Currently contributors have to guess that the proposal repository follows the Gerrit workflow and figure out on their own that this means cloning the Gerrit repository rather than the GitHub repository. State this explicitly. Change-Id: Id2c2542635ad04837ed8d74efddd2160330ebfd2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15310 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2015-09-03README.md: update proposal stepsDave Cheney
Update the proposal steps based on my feedback from the proposal process. Change-Id: I27e4e1a4cbad123b3fe6fe06a62065cf4da94b91 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14231 Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
2015-07-30doc: add README.md and TEMPLATE.mdAndrew Gerrand
Change-Id: I8c303d27c096ee431eb72e5f04b58318b55cabce Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12882 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
generated by cgit v1.3 (git 2.53.0) at 2026-04-15 06:05:03 +0000