| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The final clean-up phase of the diff output could turn the result of
histogram diff algorithm suboptimal, which has been corrected.
* yc/histogram-hunk-shift-fix:
xdiff: re-diff shifted change groups when using histogram algorithm
|
|
After a diff algorithm has been run, the compaction phase
(xdl_change_compact()) shifts and merges change groups to produce a
cleaner output. However, this shifting could create a new matched group
where both sides now have matching lines. This results in a
wrong-looking diff output which contains redundant lines that are the
same on both files.
Fix this by detecting this situation, and re-diff the texts on each side
to find similar lines, using the fall-back Myer's diff. Only do this for
histogram diff as it's the only algorithm where this is relevant. Below
contains an example, and more details.
For an example, consider two files below:
file1:
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
file2:
A
A
x
A
A
A
A
When using Myer's diff, the algorithm finds that only the "x" has been
changed, and produces a final diff result (these are line diffs, but
using word-diff syntax for ease of presentation):
A A[-A-]{+x+}A AAA
When using histogram diff, the algorithm first discovers the LCS "A
AAA", which it uses as anchor, then produces an intermediate diff:
{+A Ax+}A AAA[- AAA-].
This is a longer diff than Myer's, but it's still self-consistent.
However, the compaction phase attempts to shift the first file's diff
group upwards (note that this shift crosses the anchor that histogram
had used), leading to the final results for histogram diff:
[-A AA-]{+A Ax+}A AAA
This is a technically correct patch but looks clearly redundant to a
human as the first 3 lines should not be in the diff.
The fix would detect that a shift has caused matching to a new group,
and re-diff the "A AA" and "A Ax" parts, which results in "A A"
correctly re-marked as unchanged. This creates the now correct histogram
diff:
A A[-A-]{+x+}A AAA
This issue is not applicable to Myer's diff algorithm as it already
generates a minimal diff, which means a shift cannot result in a smaller
diff output (the default Myer's diff in xdiff is not guaranteed to be
minimal for performance reasons, but it typically does a good enough
job).
It's also not applicable to patience diff, because it uses only unique
lines as anchor for its splits, and falls back to Myer's diff within
each split. Shifting requires both ends having the same lines, and
therefore cannot cross the unique line boundaries established by the
patience algorithm. In contrast histogram diff uses non-unique lines as
anchors, and therefore shifting can cross over them.
This issue is rare in a normal repository. Below is a table of
repositories (`git log --no-merges -p --histogram -1000`), showing how
many times a re-diff was done and how many times it resulted in finding
matching lines (therefore addressing this issue) with the fix. In
general it is fewer than 1% of diff's that exhibit this offending
behavior:
| Repo (1k commits) | Re-diff | Found matching lines |
|--------------------|---------|----------------------|
| llvm-project | 45 | 11 |
| vim | 110 | 9 |
| git | 18 | 2 |
| WebKit | 168 | 1 |
| ripgrep | 22 | 1 |
| cpython | 32 | 0 |
| vscode | 13 | 0 |
Signed-off-by: Yee Cheng Chin <ychin.git@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The classic diff adds only the lines that it's going to consider,
during the diff, to an array. A mapping between the compacted
array, and the lines of the file that they reference, is
facilitated by this array.
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
size_t is used because nrec describes the number of elements for both
recs, and for 'changed' + 2.
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The ha field is serving two different purposes, which makes the code
harder to read. At first glance, it looks like many places assume
there could never be hash collisions between lines of the two input
files. In reality, line_hash is used together with xdl_recmatch() to
ensure correct comparisons of lines, even when collisions occur.
To make this clearer, the old ha field has been split:
* line_hash: a straightforward hash of a line, independent of any
external context. Its type is uint64_t, as it comes from a fixed
width hash function.
* minimal_perfect_hash: Not a new concept, but now a separate
field. It comes from the classifier's general-purpose hash table,
which assigns each line a unique and minimal hash across the two
files. A size_t is used here because it's meant to be used to
index an array. This also avoids ` as usize` casts on the Rust
side when using it to index a slice.
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
size_t is the appropriate type because size is describing the number of
elements, bytes in this case, in memory.
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Make xrecord_t.ptr uint8_t because it's referring to bytes in memory.
In order to avoid a refactor avalanche, many uses of this field were
cast to char* or similar.
Places where casting was unnecessary:
xemit.c:156
xmerge.c:124
xmerge.c:127
xmerge.c:164
xmerge.c:169
xmerge.c:172
xmerge.c:178
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The only values possible for 'changed' is 1 and 0, which exactly maps
to a bool type. It might not look like this because action1 and action2
(which use to be dis1, and dis2) were also of type char and were
assigned numerical values within a few lines of 'changed' (what used to
be rchg).
Using DISCARD/KEEP/INVESTIGATE for action1[i]/action2[j], and true/false
for changed[k] makes it clear to future readers that these are
logically separate concepts.
Best-viewed-with: --color-words
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The field rchg (now 'changed') declares if a line in a file is changed
or not. A later commit will change it's type from 'char' to 'bool'
to make its purpose even more clear.
Best-viewed-with: --color-words
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
xdfile_t currently uses chastore_t which is an arena allocator. I
think that xrecord_t used to be a linked list and recs didn't exist
originally. When recs was added I think they forgot to remove
xdfile_t.next, but was overlooked. This dual data structure setup
makes the code somewhat confusing.
Additionally the C type chastore_t isn't FFI friendly, and provides
little to no performance benefit over using realloc to grow an array.
Performance impact of deleting fields from xdfile_t:
Deleting ha is about 5% slower.
Deleting cha is about 5% faster.
Delete ha, but keep cha
time hyperfine --warmup 3 -L exe build_v2.51.0/git,build_delete_ha/git '{exe} log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null'
Benchmark 1: build_v2.51.0/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.269 s ± 0.017 s [User: 1.135 s, System: 0.128 s]
Range (min … max): 1.249 s … 1.286 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: build_delete_ha/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.339 s ± 0.017 s [User: 1.234 s, System: 0.099 s]
Range (min … max): 1.320 s … 1.358 s 10 runs
Summary
build_v2.51.0/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null ran
1.06 ± 0.02 times faster than build_delete_ha/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Delete cha, but keep ha
time hyperfine --warmup 3 -L exe build_v2.51.0/git,build_delete_chastore/git '{exe} log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null'
Benchmark 1: build_v2.51.0/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.290 s ± 0.001 s [User: 1.154 s, System: 0.130 s]
Range (min … max): 1.288 s … 1.292 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: build_delete_chastore/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.232 s ± 0.017 s [User: 1.105 s, System: 0.121 s]
Range (min … max): 1.205 s … 1.249 s 10 runs
Summary
build_delete_chastore/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null ran
1.05 ± 0.01 times faster than build_v2.51.0/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Delete ha AND chastore
time hyperfine --warmup 3 -L exe build_v2.51.0/git,build_delete_ha_and_chastore/git '{exe} log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null'
Benchmark 1: build_v2.51.0/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.291 s ± 0.002 s [User: 1.156 s, System: 0.129 s]
Range (min … max): 1.287 s … 1.295 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: build_delete_ha_and_chastore/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 1.306 s ± 0.001 s [User: 1.195 s, System: 0.105 s]
Range (min … max): 1.305 s … 1.308 s 10 runs
Summary
build_v2.51.0/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null ran
1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than build_delete_ha_and_chastore/git log --oneline --shortstat --diff-algorithm=myers -3000 v2.39.1 >/dev/null
Best-viewed-with: --color-words
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When 0 <= i < xdfile_t.nreff the following is true:
xdfile_t.ha[i] == xdfile_t.recs[xdfile_t.rindex[i]]
This makes the code about 5% slower. The fields rindex and ha are
specific to the classic diff (myers and minimal). I plan on creating a
struct for classic diff, but there's a lot of cleanup that needs to be
done before that can happen and leaving ha in would make those cleanups
harder to follow.
A subsequent commit will delete the chastore cha from xdfile_t. That
later commit will investigate deleting ha and cha independently and
together.
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Every field in this struct is an alias for a certain field in xdfile_t.
diffdata_t.nrec -> xdfile_t.nreff
diffdata_t.ha -> xdfile_t.ha
diffdata_t.rindex -> xdfile_t.rindex
diffdata_t.rchg -> xdfile_t.rchg
I think this struct existed before xdfile_t, and was kept for backward
compatibility reasons. I think xdiffi should have been refactored to
use the new (xdfile_t) struct, but was easier to alias it instead.
The local variables rchg* and rindex* don't shorten the lines by much,
nor do they really need to be there to make the code more readable.
Delete them.
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. While the code in
this patch used the comma operator intentionally (to avoid curly
brackets around two statements, each, that want to be guarded by a
condition), it is better to surround it with curly brackets and to use a
semicolon instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The loop iteration variable is non-negative and only used in comparisons
against other size_t values.
Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Mark code units that generate warnings with `-Wsign-compare`. This
allows for a structured approach to get rid of all such warnings over
time in a way that can be easily measured.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This function is used interchangeably with xdl_emit via a function
pointer, so we can't just drop the unused parameter. Mark it to silence
-Wunused-parameter.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The entry point to the patience-diff algorithm takes two mmfile_t
structs with the original file contents, but it doesn't actually do
anything useful with them. This is similar to the case recently cleaned
up in the histogram code via f1d019071e (xdiff: drop unused mmfile
parameters from xdl_do_histogram_diff(), 2022-08-19), but there's a bit
more subtlety going on.
We pass them into the recursive patience_diff(), which in turn passes
them into fill_hashmap(), which stuffs the pointers into a struct. But
the only thing which reads the struct fields is our recursion into
patience_diff()!
So it's unlikely that something like -Wunused-parameter could find this
case: it would have to detect the circular dependency caused by the
recursion (not to mention tracing across struct field assignments).
But once found, it's easy to have the compiler confirm what's going on:
1. Drop the "file1" and "file2" fields from the hashmap struct
definition. Remove the assignments in fill_hashmap(), and
temporarily substitute NULL in the recursive call to
patience_diff(). Compiling shows that no other code touched those
fields.
2. Now fill_hashmap() will trigger -Wunused-parameter. Drop "file1"
and "file2" from its definition and callsite.
3. Now patience_diff() will trigger -Wunused-parameter. Drop them
there, too. One of the callsites is the recursion with our
NULL values, so those temporary values go away.
4. Now xdl_do_patience_diff() will trigger -Wunused-parameter. Drop
them there. And we're done.
Suggested-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
These are no longer used since 9df0fc3d57 (xdiff: fix a memory leak,
2022-02-16), as the caller is expected to call xdl_prepare_env() itself.
After that change the histogram code only examines the prepared
xdfenv_t, not the original buffers.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a helper to allocate an array that automatically calculates the
allocation size. This is analogous to ALLOC_ARRAY() in the rest of the
codebase but returns NULL if the allocation fails to accommodate other
users of libxdiff such as libgit2. The helper will also return NULL if
the multiplication in the allocation calculation overflows.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Although the patience and histogram algorithms initialize the
environment they do not free it if there is an error. In contrast for
the Myers algorithm the environment is initalized in xdl_do_diff() and
it is freed if there is an error. Fix this by always initializing the
environment in xdl_do_diff() and freeing it there if there is an
error. Remove the comment in do_patience_diff() about the environment
being freed by xdl_diff() as it is not accurate because (a) xdl_diff()
does not do that if there is an error and (b) xdl_diff() is not the
only caller.
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since 6b13bc3232 (xdiff: simplify comparison, 2021-11-17), we do not
call xdl_recmatch() from xdiffi.c's recs_match(), so we no longer need
the "flags" parameter. That in turn lets us drop the flags parameters
from the group-slide functions which call it.
There's no functional change here; it's just making these functions a
little simpler.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Now that the histogram algorithm calls xdl_classify_record() it is no
longer necessary to use xdl_recmatch() to compare lines, it is
sufficient just to compare the hash values. This has a negligible
effect on performance.
Test HEAD~1 HEAD
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
4000.1: log -3000 (baseline) 0.19(0.12+0.07) 0.18(0.14+0.04) -5.3%
4000.2: log --raw -3000 (tree-only) 0.98(0.81+0.16) 0.98(0.79+0.18) +0.0%
4000.3: log -p -3000 (Myers) 4.81(4.23+0.56) 4.80(4.26+0.53) -0.2%
4000.4: log -p -3000 --histogram 5.83(5.11+0.70) 5.82(5.15+0.65) -0.2%
4000.5: log -p -3000 --patience 5.31(4.61+0.69) 5.30(4.54+0.75) -0.2%
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The xdl_bug() function was introduced in
e8adf23d1e (xdl_change_compact(): introduce the concept of a change
group, 2016-08-22), let's use our usual BUG() function instead.
We'll now have meaningful line numbers if we encounter bugs in xdiff,
and less code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a new diff option that enables ignoring changes whose all lines
(changed, removed, and added) match a given regular expression. This is
similar to the -I/--ignore-matching-lines option in standalone diff
utilities and can be used e.g. to ignore changes which only affect code
comments or to look for unrelated changes in commits containing a large
number of automatically applied modifications (e.g. a tree-wide string
replacement). The difference between -G/-S and the new -I option is
that the latter filters output on a per-change basis.
Use the 'ignore' field of xdchange_t for marking a change as ignored or
not. Since the same field is used by --ignore-blank-lines, identical
hunk emitting rules apply for --ignore-blank-lines and -I. These two
options can also be used together in the same git invocation (they are
complementary to each other).
Rename xdl_mark_ignorable() to xdl_mark_ignorable_lines(), to indicate
that it is logically a "sibling" of xdl_mark_ignorable_regex() rather
than its "parent".
Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <michal@isc.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Inspired by the thoroughly stale https://github.com/git/git/pull/159,
this patch fixes a couple of typos, rewraps and clarifies some comments.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git diff --indent-heuristic" had a bad corner case performance.
* sb/indent-heuristic-optim:
xdiff: reduce indent heuristic overhead
|
|
Skip searching for better indentation heuristics if we'd slide a hunk more
than its size. This is the easiest fix proposed in the analysis[1] in
response to a patch that mercurial took for xdiff to limit searching
by a constant. Using a performance test as:
#!python
open('a', 'w').write(" \n" * 1000000)
open('b', 'w').write(" \n" * 1000001)
This patch reduces the execution of "git diff --no-index a b" from
0.70s to 0.31s. However limiting the sliding to the size of the diff hunk,
which was proposed as a solution (that I found easiest to implement for
now) is not optimal for cases like
open('a', 'w').write(" \n" * 1000000)
open('b', 'w').write(" \n" * 2000000)
as then we'd still slide 1000000 times.
In addition to limiting the sliding to size of the hunk, also limit by a
constant. Choose 100 lines as the constant as that fits more than a screen,
which really means that the diff sliding is probably not providing a lot
of benefit anyway.
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/72ac1ac2-f567-f241-41d6-d0f83072e0b3@alum.mit.edu/
Reported-by: Jun Wu <quark@fb.com>
Analysis-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There is no need to forward-declare these functions, as they are used
after their implementation only.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The mailing address for the FSF has changed over the years. Rather than
updating the address across all files, refer readers to gnu.org, as the
GNU GPL documentation now suggests for license notices. The mailing
address is retained in the full license files (COPYING and LGPL-2.1).
The old address is still present in t/diff-lib/COPYING. This is
intentional, as the file is used in tests and the contents are not
expected to change.
Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a patch inserts a block of lines, whose last lines are the
same as the existing lines that appear before the inserted block,
"git diff" can choose any place between these existing lines as the
boundary between the pre-context and the added lines (adjusting the
end of the inserted block as appropriate) to come up with variants
of the same patch, and some variants are easier to read than others.
We have been trying to improve the choice of this boundary, and Git
2.11 shipped with an experimental "compaction-heuristic". Since
then another attempt to improve the logic further resulted in a new
"indent-heuristic" logic. It is agreed that the latter gives better
result overall, and the former outlived its usefulness.
Retire "compaction", and keep "indent" as an experimental feature.
The latter hopefully will be turned on by default in a future
release, but that should be done as a separate step.
Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Commit e8adf23 (xdl_change_compact(): introduce the concept
of a change group, 2016-08-22) added a "struct group" type
to xdiff/xdiffi.c. But the POSIX system header "grp.h"
already defines "struct group" (it is part of the getgrnam
interface). This happens to work because the new type is
local to xdiffi.c, and the xdiff code includes a relatively
small set of system headers. But it will break compilation
if xdiff ever switches to using git-compat-util.h. It can
also probably cause confusion with tools that look at the
whole code base, like coccinelle or ctags.
Let's resolve by giving the xdiff variant a scoped name,
which is closer to other xdiff types anyway (e.g.,
xdlfile_t, though note that xdiff is fond if typedefs when
Git usually is not).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Some groups of added/deleted lines in diffs can be slid up or down,
because lines at the edges of the group are not unique. Picking good
shifts for such groups is not a matter of correctness but definitely has
a big effect on aesthetics. For example, consider the following two
diffs. The first is what standard Git emits:
--- a/9c572b21dd090a1e5c5bb397053bf8043ffe7fb4:git-send-email.perl
+++ b/6dcfa306f2b67b733a7eb2d7ded1bc9987809edb:git-send-email.perl
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ if (!defined $initial_reply_to && $prompting) {
}
if (!$smtp_server) {
+ $smtp_server = $repo->config('sendemail.smtpserver');
+}
+if (!$smtp_server) {
foreach (qw( /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail )) {
if (-x $_) {
$smtp_server = $_;
The following diff is equivalent, but is obviously preferable from an
aesthetic point of view:
--- a/9c572b21dd090a1e5c5bb397053bf8043ffe7fb4:git-send-email.perl
+++ b/6dcfa306f2b67b733a7eb2d7ded1bc9987809edb:git-send-email.perl
@@ -230,6 +230,9 @@ if (!defined $initial_reply_to && $prompting) {
$initial_reply_to =~ s/(^\s+|\s+$)//g;
}
+if (!$smtp_server) {
+ $smtp_server = $repo->config('sendemail.smtpserver');
+}
if (!$smtp_server) {
foreach (qw( /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail )) {
if (-x $_) {
This patch teaches Git to pick better positions for such "diff sliders"
using heuristics that take the positions of nearby blank lines and the
indentation of nearby lines into account.
The existing Git code basically always shifts such "sliders" as far down
in the file as possible. The only exception is when the slider can be
aligned with a group of changed lines in the other file, in which case
Git favors depicting the change as one add+delete block rather than one
add and a slightly offset delete block. This naive algorithm often
yields ugly diffs.
Commit d634d61ed6 improved the situation somewhat by preferring to
position add/delete groups to make their last line a blank line, when
that is possible. This heuristic does more good than harm, but (1) it
can only help if there are blank lines in the right places, and (2)
always picks the last blank line, even if there are others that might be
better. The end result is that it makes perhaps 1/3 as many errors as
the default Git algorithm, but that still leaves a lot of ugly diffs.
This commit implements a new and much better heuristic for picking
optimal "slider" positions using the following approach: First observe
that each hypothetical positioning of a diff slider introduces two
splits: one between the context lines preceding the group and the first
added/deleted line, and the other between the last added/deleted line
and the first line of context following it. It tries to find the
positioning that creates the least bad splits.
Splits are evaluated based only on the presence and locations of nearby
blank lines, and the indentation of lines near the split. Basically, it
prefers to introduce splits adjacent to blank lines, between lines that
are indented less, and between lines with the same level of indentation.
In more detail:
1. It measures the following characteristics of a proposed splitting
position in a `struct split_measurement`:
* the number of blank lines above the proposed split
* whether the line directly after the split is blank
* the number of blank lines following that line
* the indentation of the nearest non-blank line above the split
* the indentation of the line directly below the split
* the indentation of the nearest non-blank line after that line
2. It combines the measured attributes using a bunch of
empirically-optimized weighting factors to derive a `struct
split_score` that measures the "badness" of splitting the text at
that position.
3. It combines the `split_score` for the top and the bottom of the
slider at each of its possible positions, and selects the position
that has the best `split_score`.
I determined the initial set of weighting factors by collecting a corpus
of Git histories from 29 open-source software projects in various
programming languages. I generated many diffs from this corpus, and
determined the best positioning "by eye" for about 6600 diff sliders. I
used about half of the repositories in the corpus (corresponding to
about 2/3 of the sliders) as a training set, and optimized the weights
against this corpus using a crude automated search of the parameter
space to get the best agreement with the manually-determined values.
Then I tested the resulting heuristic against the full corpus. The
results are summarized in the following table, in column `indent-1`:
| repository | count | Git 2.9.0 | compaction | compaction-fixed | indent-1 | indent-2 |
| --------------------- | ----- | -------------- | -------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | -------------- |
| afnetworking | 109 | 89 (81.7%) | 37 (33.9%) | 37 (33.9%) | 2 (1.8%) | 2 (1.8%) |
| alamofire | 30 | 18 (60.0%) | 14 (46.7%) | 15 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| angular | 184 | 127 (69.0%) | 39 (21.2%) | 23 (12.5%) | 5 (2.7%) | 5 (2.7%) |
| animate | 313 | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (0.6%) |
| ant | 380 | 356 (93.7%) | 152 (40.0%) | 148 (38.9%) | 15 (3.9%) | 15 (3.9%) | *
| bugzilla | 306 | 263 (85.9%) | 109 (35.6%) | 99 (32.4%) | 14 (4.6%) | 15 (4.9%) | *
| corefx | 126 | 91 (72.2%) | 22 (17.5%) | 21 (16.7%) | 6 (4.8%) | 6 (4.8%) |
| couchdb | 78 | 44 (56.4%) | 26 (33.3%) | 28 (35.9%) | 6 (7.7%) | 6 (7.7%) | *
| cpython | 937 | 158 (16.9%) | 50 (5.3%) | 49 (5.2%) | 5 (0.5%) | 5 (0.5%) | *
| discourse | 160 | 95 (59.4%) | 42 (26.2%) | 36 (22.5%) | 18 (11.2%) | 13 (8.1%) |
| docker | 307 | 194 (63.2%) | 198 (64.5%) | 253 (82.4%) | 8 (2.6%) | 8 (2.6%) | *
| electron | 163 | 132 (81.0%) | 38 (23.3%) | 39 (23.9%) | 6 (3.7%) | 6 (3.7%) |
| git | 536 | 470 (87.7%) | 73 (13.6%) | 78 (14.6%) | 16 (3.0%) | 16 (3.0%) | *
| gitflow | 127 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| ionic | 133 | 89 (66.9%) | 29 (21.8%) | 38 (28.6%) | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (0.8%) |
| ipython | 482 | 362 (75.1%) | 167 (34.6%) | 169 (35.1%) | 11 (2.3%) | 11 (2.3%) | *
| junit | 161 | 147 (91.3%) | 67 (41.6%) | 66 (41.0%) | 1 (0.6%) | 1 (0.6%) | *
| lighttable | 15 | 5 (33.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (13.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| magit | 88 | 75 (85.2%) | 11 (12.5%) | 9 (10.2%) | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| neural-style | 28 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| nodejs | 781 | 649 (83.1%) | 118 (15.1%) | 111 (14.2%) | 4 (0.5%) | 5 (0.6%) | *
| phpmyadmin | 491 | 481 (98.0%) | 75 (15.3%) | 48 (9.8%) | 2 (0.4%) | 2 (0.4%) | *
| react-native | 168 | 130 (77.4%) | 79 (47.0%) | 81 (48.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| rust | 171 | 128 (74.9%) | 30 (17.5%) | 27 (15.8%) | 16 (9.4%) | 14 (8.2%) |
| spark | 186 | 149 (80.1%) | 52 (28.0%) | 52 (28.0%) | 2 (1.1%) | 2 (1.1%) |
| tensorflow | 115 | 66 (57.4%) | 48 (41.7%) | 48 (41.7%) | 5 (4.3%) | 5 (4.3%) |
| test-more | 19 | 15 (78.9%) | 2 (10.5%) | 2 (10.5%) | 1 (5.3%) | 1 (5.3%) | *
| test-unit | 51 | 34 (66.7%) | 14 (27.5%) | 8 (15.7%) | 2 (3.9%) | 2 (3.9%) | *
| xmonad | 23 | 22 (95.7%) | 2 (8.7%) | 2 (8.7%) | 1 (4.3%) | 1 (4.3%) | *
| --------------------- | ----- | -------------- | -------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | -------------- |
| totals | 6668 | 4391 (65.9%) | 1496 (22.4%) | 1491 (22.4%) | 150 (2.2%) | 144 (2.2%) |
| totals (training set) | 4552 | 3195 (70.2%) | 1053 (23.1%) | 1061 (23.3%) | 86 (1.9%) | 88 (1.9%) |
| totals (test set) | 2116 | 1196 (56.5%) | 443 (20.9%) | 430 (20.3%) | 64 (3.0%) | 56 (2.6%) |
In this table, the numbers are the count and percentage of human-rated
sliders that the corresponding algorithm got *wrong*. The columns are
* "repository" - the name of the repository used. I used the diffs
between successive non-merge commits on the HEAD branch of the
corresponding repository.
* "count" - the number of sliders that were human-rated. I chose most,
but not all, sliders to rate from those among which the various
algorithms gave different answers.
* "Git 2.9.0" - the default algorithm used by `git diff` in Git 2.9.0.
* "compaction" - the heuristic used by `git diff --compaction-heuristic`
in Git 2.9.0.
* "compaction-fixed" - the heuristic used by `git diff
--compaction-heuristic` after the fixes from earlier in this patch
series. Note that the results are not dramatically different than
those for "compaction". Both produce non-ideal diffs only about 1/3 as
often as the default `git diff`.
* "indent-1" - the new `--indent-heuristic` algorithm, using the first
set of weighting factors, determined as described above.
* "indent-2" - the new `--indent-heuristic` algorithm, using the final
set of weighting factors, determined as described below.
* `*` - indicates that repo was part of training set used to determine
the first set of weighting factors.
The fact that the heuristic performed nearly as well on the test set as
on the training set in column "indent-1" is a good indication that the
heuristic was not over-trained. Given that fact, I ran a second round of
optimization, using the entire corpus as the training set. The resulting
set of weights gave the results in column "indent-2". These are the
weights included in this patch.
The final result gives consistently and significantly better results
across the whole corpus than either `git diff` or `git diff
--compaction-heuristic`. It makes only about 1/30 as many errors as the
former and about 1/10 as many errors as the latter. (And a good fraction
of the remaining errors are for diffs that involve weirdly-formatted
code, sometimes apparently machine-generated.)
The tools that were used to do this optimization and analysis, along
with the human-generated data values, are recorded in a separate project
[1].
This patch adds a new command-line option `--indent-heuristic`, and a
new configuration setting `diff.indentHeuristic`, that activate this
heuristic. This interface is only meant for testing purposes, and should
be finalized before including this change in any release.
[1] https://github.com/mhagger/diff-slider-tools
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The idea of xdl_change_compact() is fairly simple:
* Proceed through groups of changed lines in the file to be compacted,
keeping track of the corresponding location in the "other" file.
* If possible, slide the group up and down to try to give the most
aesthetically pleasing diff. Whenever it is slid, the current location
in the other file needs to be adjusted.
But these simple concepts are obfuscated by a lot of index handling that
is written in terse, subtle, and varied patterns. I found it very hard
to convince myself that the function was correct.
So introduce a "struct group" that represents a group of changed lines
in a file. Add some functions that perform elementary operations on
groups:
* Initialize a group to the first group in a file
* Move to the next or previous group in a file
* Slide a group up or down
Even though the resulting code is longer, I think it is easier to
understand and review. Its performance is not changed
appreciably (though it would be if `group_next()` and `group_previous()`
were not inlined).
...and in fact, the rewriting helped me discover another bug in the
--compaction-heuristic code: The update of blank_lines was never done
for the highest possible position of the group. This means that it could
fail to slide the group to its highest possible position, even if that
position had a blank line as its last line. So for example, it yielded
the following diff:
$ git diff --no-index --compaction-heuristic a.txt b.txt
diff --git a/a.txt b/b.txt
index e53969f..0d60c5fe 100644
--- a/a.txt
+++ b/b.txt
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
1
A
+
+B
+
+A
2
when in fact the following diff is better (according to the rules of
--compaction-heuristic):
$ git diff --no-index --compaction-heuristic a.txt b.txt
diff --git a/a.txt b/b.txt
index e53969f..0d60c5fe 100644
--- a/a.txt
+++ b/b.txt
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
1
+A
+
+B
+
A
2
The new code gives the bottom answer.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There is no reason for it to take an array and two indexes as argument,
as it only accesses two elements of the array.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There is no reason for it to take an array and index as argument, as it
only accesses a single element of the array.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If the changed group of lines can be matched to a group in the other
file, then that positioning should take precedence over the compaction
heuristic.
The old code tried the heuristic unconditionally, which cost redundant
effort and also was broken if the matching code had already shifted the
group higher than the blank line.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The code branch used for the compaction heuristic forgot to keep ixo in
sync while the group was shifted. This is certainly wrong, as it causes
the two counters to get out of sync.
I *think* that this bug could also have caused the function to read past
the end of the rchgo array, though I haven't done the work to prove it
for sure. Here is my reasoning:
If ixo is not decremented correctly during one iteration of the outer
while loop, then it will loose sync with the ix counter. In particular,
ixo will be too large.
Suppose that the next iterations of the outer while loop (i.e.,
processing the next block of add/delete lines) don't have any sliders.
Then the ixo counter would be incremented by the number of non-changed
lines in xdf, which is the same as the number of non-changed lines in
xdfo that *should have* followed the group that experienced the
malfunction. But since ixo was too large at the end of that iteration,
it will be incremented past the end of the xdfo->rchg array, and will
try to read that memory illegally.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In order to produce the smallest possible diff and combine several diff
hunks together, we implement a heuristic from GNU Diff which moves diff
hunks forward as far as possible when we find common context above and
below a diff hunk. This sometimes produces less readable diffs when
writing C, Shell, or other programming languages, ie:
...
/*
+ *
+ *
+ */
+
+/*
...
instead of the more readable equivalent of
...
+/*
+ *
+ *
+ */
+
/*
...
Implement the following heuristic to (optionally) produce the desired
output.
If there are diff chunks which can be shifted around, shift each hunk
such that the last common empty line is below the chunk with the rest
of the context above.
This heuristic appears to resolve the above example and several other
common issues without producing significantly weird results. However, as
with any heuristic it is not really known whether this will always be
more optimal. Thus, it can be disabled via diff.compactionHeuristic.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It is a common pattern in xdl_change_compact to check that hashes and
strings match. The resulting code to perform this change causes very
long lines and makes it hard to follow the intention. Introduce a helper
function recs_match which performs both checks to increase
code readability.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The goal of the patch is to introduce the GNU diff
-B/--ignore-blank-lines as closely as possible. The short option is not
available because it's already used for "break-rewrites".
When this option is used, git-diff will not create hunks that simply
add or remove empty lines, but will still show empty lines
addition/suppression if they are close enough to "valuable" changes.
There are two differences between this option and GNU diff -B option:
- GNU diff doesn't have "--inter-hunk-context", so this must be handled
- The following sequence looks like a bug (context is displayed twice):
$ seq 5 >file1
$ cat <<EOF >file2
change
1
2
3
4
5
change
EOF
$ diff -u -B file1 file2
--- file1 2013-06-08 22:13:04.471517834 +0200
+++ file2 2013-06-08 22:13:23.275517855 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
+change
1
2
+
3
4
5
@@ -3,3 +5,4 @@
3
4
5
+change
So here is a more thorough description of the option:
- real changes are interesting
- blank lines that are close enough (less than context size) to
interesting changes are considered interesting (recursive definition)
- "context" lines are used around each hunk of interesting changes
- If two hunks are separated by less than "inter-hunk-context", they
will be merged into one.
The implementation does the "interesting changes selection" in a single
pass.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The functions are unused now, remove them.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a way to register a callback function that is gets passed the
start line and line count of each hunk of a diff. Only standard
types are used.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Because the default Myers, patience and histogram algorithms cannot be in
effect at the same time, XDL_PATIENCE_DIFF and XDL_HISTOGRAM_DIFF are not
independent bits. Instead of wasting one bit per algorithm, define a few
macros to access the few bits they occupy and update the code that access
them.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Port JGit's HistogramDiff algorithm over to C. Rough numbers (TODO) show
that it is faster than its --patience cousin, as well as the default
Meyers algorithm.
The implementation has been reworked to use structs and pointers,
instead of bitmasks, thus doing away with JGit's 2^28 line limit.
We also use xdiff's default hash table implementation (xdl_hash_bits()
with XDL_HASHLONG()) for convenience.
Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Mike Ralphson <mike@abacus.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
http-push.c::finish_request():
request is initialized by the for loop
index-pack.c::free_base_data():
b is initialized by the for loop
merge-recursive.c::process_renames():
move compare to narrower scope, and remove unused assignments to it
remove unused variable renames2
xdiff/xdiffi.c::xdl_recs_cmp():
remove unused variable ec
xdiff/xemit.c::xdl_emit_diff():
xche is always overwritten
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The patience diff algorithm produces slightly more intuitive output
than the classic Myers algorithm, as it does not try to minimize the
number of +/- lines first, but tries to preserve the lines that are
unique.
To this end, it first determines lines that are unique in both files,
then the maximal sequence which preserves the order (relative to both
files) is extracted.
Starting from this initial set of common lines, the rest of the lines
is handled recursively, with Myers' algorithm as a fallback when
the patience algorithm fails (due to no common unique lines).
This patch includes memory leak fixes by Pierre Habouzit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
For some users (e.g. git blame), getting textual patch output is just
extra work, as they can get all the information they need from the low-
level diff structures. Allow for an alternate low-level emit function
to be defined to allow bypassing the textual patch generation; set
xemitconf_t's emit_func member to enable this.
The (void (*)()) type is pretty ugly, but the alternative would be to
include most of the private xdiff headers in xdiff.h to get the types
required for the "proper" function prototype. Also, a (void *) won't
work, as ANSI C doesn't allow a function pointer to be cast to an
object pointer.
Signed-off-by: Brian Downing <bdowning@lavos.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
