aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t6500-gc.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-02-24t6500: explicitly use "gc" strategyPatrick Steinhardt
The test in t6500 explicitly wants to exercise git-gc(1) and is thus highly specific to the actual on-disk state of the repository and specifically of the object database. An upcoming change modifies the default maintenance strategy to be the "geometric" strategy though, which breaks a couple of assumptions. One fix would arguably be to disable auto-maintenance altogether, as we do want to explicitly verify git-gc(1) anyway. But as the whole test suite is about git-gc(1) in the first place it feels more sensible to configure the default maintenance strategy to be "gc". Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2025-02-12Merge branch 'zh/gc-expire-to'Junio C Hamano
"git gc" learned the "--expire-to" option and passes it down to underlying "git repack". * zh/gc-expire-to: gc: add `--expire-to` option
2025-01-24gc: add `--expire-to` optionZheNing Hu
This commit extends the functionality of `git gc` by adding a new option, `--expire-to=<dir>`. Previously, this feature was implemented in 91badeba32 (builtin/repack.c: implement `--expire-to` for storing pruned objects, 2022-10-24), which allowing users to specify a directory where unreachable and expired cruft packs are stored during garbage collection. However, users had to run `git repack --cruft --expire-to=<dir>` followed by `git prune` to achieve similar results within `git gc`. By introducing `--expire-to=<dir>` directly into `git gc`, we simplify the process for users who wish to manage their repository's cleanup more efficiently. This change involves passing the `--expire-to=<dir>` parameter through to `git repack`, making it easier for users to set up a backup location for cruft packs that will be pruned. Due to the original `git gc --prune=now` deleting all unreachable objects by passing the `-a` parameter to git repack. With the addition of the `--cruft` and `--expire-to` options, it is necessary to modify this default behavior: instead of deleting these unreachable objects, they should be merged into a cruft pack and collected in a specified directory. Therefore, we do not pass `-a` to the repack command but instead pass `--cruft`, `--expire-to`, and `--cruft-expiration=now` to repack. Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-11-21t: remove TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK annotationsPatrick Steinhardt
Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-09-20Merge branch 'ps/leakfixes-part-6'Junio C Hamano
More leakfixes. * ps/leakfixes-part-6: (22 commits) builtin/repack: fix leaking keep-pack list merge-ort: fix two leaks when handling directory rename modifications match-trees: fix leaking prefixes in `shift_tree()` builtin/fmt-merge-msg: fix leaking buffers builtin/grep: fix leaking object context builtin/pack-objects: plug leaking list of keep-packs builtin/repack: fix leaking line buffer when packing promisors negotiator/skipping: fix leaking commit entries shallow: fix leaking members of `struct shallow_info` shallow: free grafts when unregistering them object: clear grafts when clearing parsed object pool gpg-interface: fix misdesigned signing key interfaces send-pack: fix leaking push cert nonce remote: fix leak in reachability check of a remote-tracking ref remote: fix leaking tracking refs builtin/submodule--helper: fix leaking refs on push-check submodule: fix leaking fetch task data upload-pack: fix leaking child process data on reachability checks builtin/push: fix leaking refspec query result send-pack: fix leaking common object IDs ...
2024-09-05builtin/repack: fix leaking keep-pack listPatrick Steinhardt
The list of packs to keep is populated via a command line option but never free'd. Plug this memory leak. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-08-16builtin/gc: add a `--detach` flagPatrick Steinhardt
When running `git gc --auto`, the command will by default detach and continue running in the background. This behaviour can be tweaked via the `gc.autoDetach` config, but not via a command line switch. We need that in a subsequent commit though, where git-maintenance(1) will want to ask its git-gc(1) child process to not detach anymore. Add a `--[no-]detach` flag that does this for us. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-06-20Merge branch 'ds/ahead-behind-fix'Junio C Hamano
Fix for a progress bar. * ds/ahead-behind-fix: commit-graph: increment progress indicator
2024-06-12commit-graph: increment progress indicatorDerrick Stolee
This fixes a bug that was introduced by 368d19b0b7 (commit-graph: refactor compute_topological_levels(), 2023-03-20): Previously, the progress indicator was updated from `i + 1` where `i` is the loop variable of the enclosing `for` loop. After this patch, the update used `info->progress_cnt + 1` instead, however, unlike `i`, the `progress_cnt` attribute was not incremented. Let's increment it. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> [jc: squashed in a test update from Patrick Steinhardt] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-03-25t6500: extract objects with "17" prefixPatrick Steinhardt
The ".git/obects/17/" shard is somewhat special because it is used by git-gc(1) to estimate how many objects there are by extrapolating the number of objects in that shard, only. In t6500 we thus have a hard coded set of data that, when written to the object database, result in blobs starting with that prefix. We are about to need such "17"-prefixed objects in another test suite. Extract them into "t/oid-info/hash-info" so that they can be reused by other tests. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-08Merge branch 'jc/test-i18ngrep'Junio C Hamano
Another step to deprecate test_i18ngrep. * jc/test-i18ngrep: tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grep test framework: further deprecate test_i18ngrep
2023-11-02tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grepJunio C Hamano
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep. This patch was produced more or less with git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' | xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /' and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit. You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected, in addition to the manual reproduction. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-10-18Merge branch 'tb/repack-max-cruft-size'Junio C Hamano
"git repack" learned "--max-cruft-size" to prevent cruft packs from growing without bounds. * tb/repack-max-cruft-size: repack: free existing_cruft array after use builtin/repack.c: avoid making cruft packs preferred builtin/repack.c: implement support for `--max-cruft-size` builtin/repack.c: parse `--max-pack-size` with OPT_MAGNITUDE t7700: split cruft-related tests to t7704
2023-10-05builtin/repack.c: implement support for `--max-cruft-size`Taylor Blau
Cruft packs are an alternative mechanism for storing a collection of unreachable objects whose mtimes are recent enough to avoid being pruned out of the repository. When cruft packs were first introduced back in b757353676 (builtin/pack-objects.c: --cruft without expiration, 2022-05-20) and a7d493833f (builtin/pack-objects.c: --cruft with expiration, 2022-05-20), the recommended workflow consisted of: - Repacking periodically, either by packing anything loose in the repository (via `git repack -d`) or producing a geometric sequence of packs (via `git repack --geometric=<d> -d`). - Every so often, splitting the repository into two packs, one cruft to store the unreachable objects, and another non-cruft pack to store the reachable objects. Repositories may (out of band with the above) choose periodically to prune out some unreachable objects which have aged out of the grace period by generating a pack with `--cruft-expiration=<approxidate>`. This allowed repositories to maintain relatively few packs on average, and quarantine unreachable objects together in a cruft pack, avoiding the pitfalls of holding unreachable objects as loose while they age out (for more, see some of the details in 3d89a8c118 (Documentation/technical: add cruft-packs.txt, 2022-05-20)). This all works, but can be costly from an I/O-perspective when frequently repacking a repository that has many unreachable objects. This problem is exacerbated when those unreachable objects are rarely (if every) pruned. Since there is at most one cruft pack in the above scheme, each time we update the cruft pack it must be rewritten from scratch. Because much of the pack is reused, this is a relatively inexpensive operation from a CPU-perspective, but is very costly in terms of I/O since we end up rewriting basically the same pack (plus any new unreachable objects that have entered the repository since the last time a cruft pack was generated). At the time, we decided against implementing more robust support for multiple cruft packs. This patch implements that support which we were lacking. Introduce a new option `--max-cruft-size` which allows repositories to accumulate cruft packs up to a given size, after which point a new generation of cruft packs can accumulate until it reaches the maximum size, and so on. To generate a new cruft pack, the process works like so: - Sort a list of any existing cruft packs in ascending order of pack size. - Starting from the beginning of the list, group cruft packs together while the accumulated size is smaller than the maximum specified pack size. - Combine the objects in these cruft packs together into a new cruft pack, along with any other unreachable objects which have since entered the repository. Once a cruft pack grows beyond the size specified via `--max-cruft-size` the pack is effectively frozen. This limits the I/O churn up to a quadratic function of the value specified by the `--max-cruft-size` option, instead of behaving quadratically in the number of total unreachable objects. When pruning unreachable objects, we bypass the new code paths which combine small cruft packs together, and instead start from scratch, passing in the appropriate `--max-pack-size` down to `pack-objects`, putting it in charge of keeping the resulting set of cruft packs sized correctly. This may seem like further I/O churn, but in practice it isn't so bad. We could prune old cruft packs for whom all or most objects are removed, and then generate a new cruft pack with just the remaining set of objects. But this additional complexity buys us relatively little, because most objects end up being pruned anyway, so the I/O churn is well contained. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-10-02gc: add `gc.repackFilterTo` config optionChristian Couder
A previous commit implemented the `gc.repackFilter` config option to specify a filter that should be used by `git gc` when performing repacks. Another previous commit has implemented `git repack --filter-to=<dir>` to specify the location of the packfile containing filtered out objects when using a filter. Let's implement the `gc.repackFilterTo` config option to specify that location in the config when `gc.repackFilter` is used. Now when `git gc` will perform a repack with a <dir> configured through this option and not empty, the repack process will be passed a corresponding `--filter-to=<dir>` argument. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-10-02gc: add `gc.repackFilter` config optionChristian Couder
A previous commit has implemented `git repack --filter=<filter-spec>` to allow users to filter out some objects from the main pack and move them into a new different pack. Users might want to perform such a cleanup regularly at the same time as they perform other repacks and cleanups, so as part of `git gc`. Let's allow them to configure a <filter-spec> for that purpose using a new gc.repackFilter config option. Now when `git gc` will perform a repack with a <filter-spec> configured through this option and not empty, the repack process will be passed a corresponding `--filter=<filter-spec>` argument. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-18builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled by defaultTaylor Blau
Back in 5b92477f89 (builtin/gc.c: conditionally avoid pruning objects via loose, 2022-05-20), `git gc` learned the `--cruft` option and `gc.cruftPacks` configuration to opt-in to writing cruft packs when collecting or pruning unreachable objects. Cruft packs were introduced with the merge in a50036da1a (Merge branch 'tb/cruft-packs', 2022-06-03). They address the problem of "loose object explosions", where Git will write out many individual loose objects when there is a large number of unreachable objects that have not yet aged past `--prune=<date>`. Instead of keeping track of those unreachable yet recent objects via their loose object file's mtime, cruft packs collect all unreachable objects into a single pack with a corresponding `*.mtimes` file that acts as a table to store the mtimes of all unreachable objects. This prevents the need to store unreachable objects as loose as they age out of the repository, and avoids the problem of loose object explosions. Beyond avoiding loose object explosions, cruft packs also act as a more efficient mechanism to store unreachable objects as they age out of a repository. This is because pairs of similar unreachable objects serve as delta bases for one another. In 5b92477f89, the feature was introduced as experimental. Since then, GitHub has been running these patches in every repository generating hundreds of millions of cruft packs along the way. The feature is battle-tested, and avoids many pathological cases such as above. Users who either run `git gc` manually, or via `git maintenance` can benefit from having cruft packs. As such, enable cruft pack generation to take place by default (by making `gc.cruftPacks` have the default of "true" rather than "false). Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-18t/t6500-gc.sh: add additional test casesTaylor Blau
In the last commit, we refactored some of the tests in t6500 to make clearer when cruft packs will and won't be generated by `git gc`. Add the remaining cases not covered by the previous patch into this one, which enumerates all possible combinations of arguments that will produce (or not produce) a cruft pack. This prepares us for a future commit which will change the default value of `gc.cruftPacks` by ensuring that we understand which invocations do and do not change as a result. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-18t/t6500-gc.sh: refactor cruft pack testsTaylor Blau
In 12253ab6d0 (gc: add tests for --cruft and friends, 2022-10-26), we added a handful of tests to t6500 to ensure that `git gc` respected the value of `--cruft` and `gc.cruftPacks`. Then, in c695592850 (config: let feature.experimental imply gc.cruftPacks=true, 2022-10-26), another set of similar tests was added to ensure that `feature.experimental` correctly implied enabling cruft pack generation (or not). These tests are similar and could be consolidated. Do so in this patch to prepare for expanding the set of command-line invocations that enable or disable writing cruft packs. This makes it possible to easily test more combinations of arguments without being overly repetitive. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-18builtin/gc.c: ignore cruft packs with `--keep-largest-pack`Taylor Blau
When cruft packs were implemented, we never adjusted the code for `git gc`'s `--keep-largest-pack` and `gc.bigPackThreshold` to ignore cruft packs. This option and configuration option share a common implementation, but including cruft packs is wrong in both cases: - Running `git gc --keep-largest-pack` in a repository where the largest pack is the cruft pack itself will make it impossible for `git gc` to prune objects, since the cruft pack itself is kept. - The same is true for `gc.bigPackThreshold`, if the size of the cruft pack exceeds the limit set by the caller. In the future, it is possible that `gc.bigPackThreshold` could be used to write a separate cruft pack containing any new unreachable objects that entered the repository since the last time a cruft pack was written. There are some complexities to doing so, mainly around handling pruning objects that are in an existing cruft pack that is above the threshold (which would either need to be rewritten, or else delay pruning). Rewriting a substantially similar cruft pack isn't ideal, but it is significantly better than the status-quo. If users have large cruft packs that they don't want to rewrite, they can mark them as `*.keep` packs. But in general, if a repository has a cruft pack that is so large it is slowing down GC's, it should probably be pruned anyway. In the meantime, ignore cruft packs in the common implementation for both of these options, and add a pair of tests to prevent any future regressions here. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-26config: let feature.experimental imply gc.cruftPacks=trueEmily Shaffer
We are interested in exploring whether gc.cruftPacks=true should become the default value. To determine whether it is safe to do so, let's encourage more users to try it out. Users who have set feature.experimental=true have already volunteered to try new and possibly-breaking config changes, so let's try this new default with that set of users. Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-26gc: add tests for --cruft and friendsEmily Shaffer
In 5b92477f89 (builtin/gc.c: conditionally avoid pruning objects via loose, 2022-05-20) gc learned to respect '--cruft' and 'gc.cruftPacks'. '--cruft' is exercised in t5329-pack-objects-cruft.sh, but in a way that doesn't check whether a lone gc run generates these cruft packs. 'gc.cruftPacks' is never exercised. Add some tests to exercise these options to gc in the gc test suite. Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-03-17gc + p4 tests: use "test_hook", remove sub-shellsÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Refactor the repository setup code for tests that test hooks the use of sub-shells when setting up the test repository and hooks, and use the "test_hook" wrapper instead of "write_scripts". Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-08-02t6500: use "ls -1" to snapshot ref database stateHan-Wen Nienhuys
By doing ls -1 .git/{reftable,refs/heads}, we can capture changes to both reftable and packed/loose ref storage. This relies on the fact that git-pack-refs (which we're looking for here) changes the number (loose/packed storage) and/or names (reftable) files used for ref storage. Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-16gc tests: add a test for the "pre-auto-gc" hookÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Add a missing test for the behavior of the pre-auto-gc hook added in 0b85d92661e (Documentation/hooks: add pre-auto-gc hook, 2008-04-02). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-22Merge branch 'ab/test-lib'Junio C Hamano
Test framework clean-up. * ab/test-lib: test-lib-functions: assert correct parameter count test-lib-functions: remove bug-inducing "diagnostics" helper param test libs: rename "diff-lib" to "lib-diff" t/.gitattributes: sort lines test-lib-functions: move function to lib-bitmap.sh test libs: rename gitweb-lib.sh to lib-gitweb.sh test libs: rename bundle helper to "lib-bundle.sh" test-lib-functions: remove generate_zero_bytes() wrapper test-lib-functions: move test_set_index_version() to its user test lib: change "error" to "BUG" as appropriate test-lib: remove check_var_migration
2021-02-12test-lib-functions: remove bug-inducing "diagnostics" helper paramÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Remove the optional "diagnostics" parameter of the test_path_is_{file,dir,missing} functions. We have a lot of uses of these functions, but the only legitimate use of the diagnostics parameter is from when the functions themselves were introduced in 2caf20c52b7 (test-lib: user-friendly alternatives to test [-d|-f|-e], 2010-08-10). But as the the rest of this diff demonstrates its presence did more to silently introduce bugs in our tests. Fix such bugs in the tests added in ae4e89e549b (gc: add --keep-largest-pack option, 2018-04-15), and c04ba51739a (t6046: testcases checking whether updates can be skipped in a merge, 2018-04-19). Let's also assert that those functions are called with exactly one parameter, a follow-up commit will add similar asserts to other functions in test-lib-functions.sh that we didn't have existing misuse of. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-25t: prepare for GIT_TEST_WRITE_REV_INDEXTaylor Blau
In the next patch, we'll add support for unconditionally enabling the 'pack.writeReverseIndex' setting with a new GIT_TEST_WRITE_REV_INDEX environment variable. This causes a little bit of fallout with tests that, for example, compare the list of files in the pack directory being unprepared to see .rev files in its output. Those locations can be cleaned up to look for specific file extensions, rather than take everything in the pack directory (for instance) and then grep out unwanted items. Once the pack.writeReverseIndex option has been thoroughly tested, we will default it to 'true', removing GIT_TEST_WRITE_REV_INDEX, and making it possible to revert this patch. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-30t6500: specify test values for SHA-256brian m. carlson
In this test, we want to produce several blobs whose first two hex characters are "17", since we look at this object directory as a proxy for how many loose objects there are before we need to GC. Use test_oid_cache to specify strings that will hash to the right values when turned into blobs. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-27commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress()Derrick Stolee
When writing a commit-graph, we show progress along several commit walks. When we use start_delayed_progress(), the progress line will only appear if that step takes a decent amount of time. However, one place was missed: computing generation numbers. This is normally a very fast operation as all commits have been parsed in a previous step. But, this is showing up for all users no matter how few commits are being added. The tests that check for the progress output have already been updated to use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 to force the expected output. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reported-by: ryenus <ryenus@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-27progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAYDerrick Stolee
The start_delayed_progress() method is a preferred way to show optional progress to users as it ignores steps that take less than two seconds. However, this makes testing unreliable as tests expect to be very fast. In addition, users may want to decrease or increase this time interval depending on their preferences for terminal noise. Create the GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY environment variable to control the delay set during start_delayed_progress(). Set the value in some tests to guarantee their output remains consistent. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-28server-info: do not list unlinked packsEric Wong
Having non-existent packs in objects/info/packs causes dumb HTTP clients to abort. v2: use single loop with ALLOC_GROW as suggested by Jeff King Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-19Merge branch 'js/t6500-use-windows-pid-on-mingw'Junio C Hamano
Future-proof a test against an update to MSYS2 runtime v3.x series. * js/t6500-use-windows-pid-on-mingw: t6500(mingw): use the Windows PID of the shell
2019-05-08t6500(mingw): use the Windows PID of the shellJohannes Schindelin
In Git for Windows, we use the MSYS2 Bash which inherits a non-standard PID model from Cygwin's POSIX emulation layer: every MSYS2 process has a regular Windows PID, and in addition it has an MSYS2 PID (which corresponds to a shadow process that emulates Unix-style signal handling). With the upgrade to the MSYS2 runtime v3.x, this shadow process cannot be accessed via `OpenProcess()` any longer, and therefore t6500 thought incorrectly that the process referenced in `gc.pid` (which is not actually a real `gc` process in this context, but the current shell) no longer exists. Let's fix this by making sure that the Windows PID is written into `gc.pid` in this test script so that `git.exe` is able to understand that that process does indeed still exist. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-01gc: handle & check gc.reflogExpire configÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Don't redundantly run "git reflog expire --all" when gc.reflogExpire and gc.reflogExpireUnreachable are set to "never", and die immediately if those configuration valuer are bad. As an earlier "assert lack of early exit" change to the tests for "git reflog expire" shows, an early check of gc.reflogExpire{Unreachable,} isn't wanted in general for "git reflog expire", but it makes sense for "gc" because: 1) Similarly to 8ab5aa4bd8 ("parseopt: handle malformed --expire arguments more nicely", 2018-04-21) we'll now die early if the config variables are set to invalid values. We run "pack-refs" before "reflog expire", which can take a while, only to then die on an invalid gc.reflogExpire{Unreachable,} configuration. 2) Not invoking the command at all means it won't show up in trace output, which makes what's going on more obvious when the two are set to "never". 3) As a later change documents we lock the refs when looping over the refs to expire, even in cases where we end up doing nothing due to this config. For the reasons noted in the earlier "assert lack of early exit" change I don't think it's worth it to bend over backwards in "git reflog expire" itself to carefully detect if we'll really do nothing given the combination of all its possible options and skip that locking, but that's easy to detect here in "gc" where we'll only run "reflog expire" in a relatively simple mode. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-16Merge branch 'jn/gc-auto'Junio C Hamano
"gc --auto" ended up calling exit(-1) upon error, which has been corrected to use exit(1). Also the error reporting behaviour when daemonized has been updated to exit with zero status when stopping due to a previously discovered error (which implies there is no point running gc to improve the situation); we used to exit with failure in such a case. * jn/gc-auto: gc: do not return error for prior errors in daemonized mode
2018-10-16Merge branch 'jn/gc-auto-prep'Junio C Hamano
Code clean-up. * jn/gc-auto-prep: gc: exit with status 128 on failure gc: improve handling of errors reading gc.log
2018-09-20gc: fix regression in 7b0f229222 impacting --quietÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Fix a regression in my recent 7b0f229222 ("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17). The newly added progress output for "commit-graph write" didn't check the --quiet option. Do so, and add a test asserting that this works as expected. Since the TTY prequisite isn't available everywhere let's add a version of this that both requires and doesn't require that. This test might be overly specific and will break if new progress output is added, but I think it'll serve as a good reminder to test the undertested progress mode(s). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Helped-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-17gc: do not return error for prior errors in daemonized modeJonathan Nieder
Some build machines started consistently failing to fetch updated source using "repo sync", with error error: The last gc run reported the following. Please correct the root cause and remove /build/.repo/projects/tools/git.git/gc.log. Automatic cleanup will not be performed until the file is removed. warning: There are too many unreachable loose objects; run 'git prune' to remove them. The cause takes some time to describe. In v2.0.0-rc0~145^2 (gc: config option for running --auto in background, 2014-02-08), "git gc --auto" learned to run in the background instead of blocking the invoking command. In this mode, it closed stderr to avoid interleaving output with any subsequent commands, causing warnings like the above to be swallowed; v2.6.3~24^2 (gc: save log from daemonized gc --auto and print it next time, 2015-09-19) addressed that by storing any diagnostic output in .git/gc.log and allowing the next "git gc --auto" run to print it. To avoid wasteful repeated fruitless gcs, when gc.log is present, the subsequent "gc --auto" would die after printing its contents. Most git commands, such as "git fetch", ignore the exit status from "git gc --auto" so all is well at this point: the user gets to see the error message, and the fetch succeeds, without a wasteful additional attempt at an automatic gc. External tools like repo[1], though, do care about the exit status from "git gc --auto". In non-daemonized mode, the exit status is straightforward: if there is an error, it is nonzero, but after a warning like the above, the status is zero. The daemonized mode, as a side effect of the other properties provided, offers a very strange exit code convention: - if no housekeeping was required, the exit status is 0 - the first real run, after forking into the background, returns exit status 0 unconditionally. The parent process has no way to know whether gc will succeed. - if there is any diagnostic output in gc.log, subsequent runs return a nonzero exit status to indicate that gc was not triggered. There's nothing for the calling program to act on on the basis of that error. Use status 0 consistently instead, to indicate that we decided not to run a gc (just like if no housekeeping was required). This way, repo and similar tools can get the benefit of the same behavior as tools like "git fetch" that ignore the exit status from gc --auto. Once the period of time described by gc.pruneExpire elapses, the unreachable loose objects will be removed by "git gc --auto" automatically. [1] https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/10598/ Reported-by: Andrii Dehtiarov <adehtiarov@google.com> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-17gc: exit with status 128 on failureJonathan Nieder
A value of -1 returned from cmd_gc gets propagated to exit(), resulting in an exit status of 255. Use die instead for a clearer error message and a controlled exit. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-04-16gc --auto: exclude base pack if not enough mem to "repack -ad"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
pack-objects could be a big memory hog especially on large repos, everybody knows that. The suggestion to stick a .keep file on the giant base pack to avoid this problem is also known for a long time. Recent patches add an option to do just this, but it has to be either configured or activated manually. This patch lets `git gc --auto` activate this mode automatically when it thinks `repack -ad` will use a lot of memory and start affecting the system due to swapping or flushing OS cache. gc --auto decides to do this based on an estimation of pack-objects memory usage, which is quite accurate at least for the heap part, and whether that fits in half of system memory (the assumption here is for desktop environment where there are many other applications running). This mechanism only kicks in if gc.bigBasePackThreshold is not configured. If it is, it is assumed that the user already knows what they want. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-04-16gc: add --keep-largest-pack optionNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
This adds a new repack mode that combines everything into a secondary pack, leaving the largest pack alone. This could help reduce memory pressure. On linux-2.6.git, valgrind massif reports 1.6GB heap in "pack all" case, and 535MB in "pack all except the base pack" case. We save roughly 1GB memory by excluding the base pack. This should also lower I/O because we don't have to rewrite a giant pack every time (e.g. for linux-2.6.git that's a 1.4GB pack file).. PS. The use of string_list here seems overkill, but we'll need it in the next patch... Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-27t/helper: merge test-chmtime into test-toolNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-07-12gc: run pre-detach operations under lockJeff King
We normally try to avoid having two auto-gc operations run at the same time, because it wastes resources. This was done long ago in 64a99eb47 (gc: reject if another gc is running, unless --force is given, 2013-08-08). When we do a detached auto-gc, we run the ref-related commands _before_ detaching, to avoid confusing lock contention. This was done by 62aad1849 (gc --auto: do not lock refs in the background, 2014-05-25). These two features do not interact well. The pre-detach operations are run before we check the gc.pid lock, meaning that on a busy repository we may run many of them concurrently. Ideally we'd take the lock before spawning any operations, and hold it for the duration of the program. This is tricky, though, with the way the pid-file interacts with the daemonize() process. Other processes will check that the pid recorded in the pid-file still exists. But detaching causes us to fork and continue running under a new pid. So if we take the lock before detaching, the pid-file will have a bogus pid in it. We'd have to go back and update it with the new pid after detaching. We'd also have to play some tricks with the tempfile subsystem to tweak the "owner" field, so that the parent process does not clean it up on exit, but the child process does. Instead, we can do something a bit simpler: take the lock only for the duration of the pre-detach work, then detach, then take it again for the post-detach work. Technically, this means that the post-detach lock could lose to another process doing pre-detach work. But in the long run this works out. That second process would then follow-up by doing post-detach work. Unless it was in turn blocked by a third process doing pre-detach work, and so on. This could in theory go on indefinitely, as the pre-detach work does not repack, and so need_to_gc() will continue to trigger. But in each round we are racing between the pre- and post-detach locks. Eventually, one of the post-detach locks will win the race and complete the full gc. So in the worst case, we may racily repeat the pre-detach work, but we would never do so simultaneously (it would happen via a sequence of serialized race-wins). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-04-16t6500: wait for detached auto gc at the end of the test scriptSZEDER Gábor
The last test in 't6500-gc', 'background auto gc does not run if gc.log is present and recent but does if it is old', added in a831c06a2 (gc: ignore old gc.log files, 2017-02-10), may sporadically trigger an error message from the test harness: rm: cannot remove 'trash directory.t6500-gc/.git/objects': Directory not empty The test in question ends with executing an auto gc in the backround, which occasionally takes so long that it's still running when 'test_done' is about to remove the trash directory. This 'rm -rf $trash' in the foreground might race with the detached auto gc to create and delete files and directories, and gc might (re-)create a path that 'rm' already visited and removed, triggering the above error message when 'rm' attempts to remove its parent directory. Commit bb05510e5 (t5510: run auto-gc in the foreground, 2016-05-01) fixed the same problem in a different test script by simply disallowing background gc. Unfortunately, what worked there is not applicable here, because the purpose of this test is to check the behavior of a detached auto gc. Make sure that the test doesn't continue before the gc is finished in the background with a clever bit of shell trickery: - Open fd 9 in the shell, to be inherited by the background gc process, because our daemonize() only closes the standard fds 0, 1 and 2. - Duplicate this fd 9 to stdout. - Read 'git gc's stdout, and thus fd 9, through a command substitution. We don't actually care about gc's output, but this construct has two useful properties: - This read blocks until stdout or fd 9 are open. While stdout is closed after the main gc process creates the background process and exits, fd 9 remains open until the backround process exits. - The variable assignment from the command substitution gets its exit status from the command executed within the command substitution, i.e. a failing main gc process will cause the test to fail. Note, that this fd trickery doesn't work on Windows, because due to MSYS limitations the git process only inherits the standard fds 0, 1 and 2 from the shell. Luckily, it doesn't matter in this case, because on Windows daemonize() is basically a noop, thus 'git gc --auto' always runs in the foreground. And since we can now continue the test reliably after the detached gc finished, check that there is only a single packfile left at the end, i.e. that the detached gc actually did what it was supposed to do. Also add a comment at the end of the test script to warn developers of future tests about this issue of long running detached gc processes. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-02-13gc: ignore old gc.log filesDavid Turner
A server can end up in a state where there are lots of unreferenced loose objects (say, because many users are doing a bunch of rebasing and pushing their rebased branches). Running "git gc --auto" in this state would cause a gc.log file to be created, preventing future auto gcs, causing pack files to pile up. Since many git operations are O(n) in the number of pack files, this would lead to poor performance. Git should never get itself into a state where it refuses to do any maintenance, just because at some point some piece of the maintenance didn't make progress. Teach Git to ignore gc.log files which are older than (by default) one day old, which can be tweaked via the gc.logExpiry configuration variable. That way, these pack files will get cleaned up, if necessary, at least once per day. And operators who find a need for more-frequent gcs can adjust gc.logExpiry to meet their needs. There is also some cleanup: a successful manual gc, or a warning-free auto gc with an old log file, will remove any old gc.log files. It might still happen that manual intervention is required (e.g. because the repo is corrupt), but at the very least it won't be because Git is too dumb to try again. Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-12-29auto gc: don't write bitmaps for incremental repacksDavid Turner
When git gc --auto does an incremental repack of loose objects, we do not expect to be able to write a bitmap; it is very likely that objects in the new pack will have references to objects outside of the pack. So we shouldn't try to write a bitmap, because doing so will likely issue a warning. This warning was making its way into gc.log. When the gc.log was present, future auto gc runs would refuse to run. Patch by Jeff King. Bug report, test, and commit message by David Turner. Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-08pack-objects: do not get distracted by broken symrefsJohannes Schindelin
It is quite possible for, say, a remote HEAD to become broken, e.g. when the default branch was renamed. We should still be able to pack our objects when such a thing happens; simply ignore broken symrefs (because they cannot matter for the packing process anyway). This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/423 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-05gc: demonstrate failure with stale remote HEADJohannes Schindelin
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-18gc: remove gc.pid file at end of executionJonathan Nieder
This file isn't really harmful, but isn't useful either, and can create minor annoyance for the user: * It's confusing, as the presence of a *.pid file often implies that a process is currently running. A user running "ls .git/" and finding this file may incorrectly guess that a "git gc" is currently running. * Leaving this file means that a "git gc" in an already gc-ed repo is no-longer a no-op. A user running "git gc" in a set of repositories, and then synchronizing this set (e.g. rsync -av, unison, ...) will see all the gc.pid files as changed, which creates useless noise. This patch unlinks the file after the garbage collection is done, so that gc.pid is actually present only during execution. Future versions of Git may want to use the information left in the gc.pid file (e.g. for policies like "don't attempt to run a gc if one has already been ran less than X hours ago"). If so, this patch can safely be reverted. For now, let's not bother the users. Explained-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Improved-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>