| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In cd846bacc7d (pack-objects: introduce '--stdin-packs=follow',
2025-06-23), pack-objects learned to traverse through commits in
included packs when using '--stdin-packs=follow', rescuing reachable
objects from unlisted packs into the output.
When we encounter a commit in an excluded pack during this rescuing
phase we will traverse through its parents. But because we set
`revs.no_kept_objects = 1`, commit simplification will prevent us from
showing it via `get_revision()`. (In practice, `--stdin-packs=follow`
walks commits down to the roots, but only opens up trees for ones that
do not appear in an excluded pack.)
But there are certain cases where we *do* need to see the parents of an
object in an excluded pack. Namely, if an object is rescue-able, but
only reachable from object(s) which appear in excluded packs, then
commit simplification will exclude those commits from the object
traversal, and we will never see a copy of that object, and thus not
rescue it.
This is what causes the failure in the previous commit during repacking.
When performing a geometric repack, packs above the geometric split that
weren't part of the previous MIDX (e.g., packs pushed directly into
`$GIT_DIR/objects/pack`) may not have full object closure. When those
packs are listed as excluded via the '^' marker, the reachability
traversal encounters the sequence described above, and may miss objects
which we expect to rescue with `--stdin-packs=follow`.
Introduce a new "excluded-open" pack prefix, '!'. Like '^'-prefixed
packs, objects from '!'-prefixed packs are excluded from the resulting
pack. But unlike '^', commits in '!'-prefixed packs *are* used as
starting points for the follow traversal, and the traversal does not
treat them as a closure boundary.
In order to distinguish excluded-closed from excluded-open packs during
the traversal, introduce a new `pack_keep_in_core_open` bit on
`struct packed_git`, along with a corresponding `KEPT_PACK_IN_CORE_OPEN`
flag for the kept-pack cache.
In `add_object_entry_from_pack()`, move the `want_object_in_pack()`
check to *after* `add_pending_oid()`. This is necessary so that commits
from excluded-open packs are added as traversal tips even though their
objects won't appear in the output. As a consequence, the caller
`for_each_object_in_pack()` will always provide a non-NULL 'p', hence we
are able to drop the "if (p)" conditional.
The `include_check` and `include_check_obj` callbacks on `rev_info` are
used to halt the walk at closed-excluded packs, since objects behind a
'^' boundary are guaranteed to have closure and need not be rescued.
The following commit will make use of this new functionality within the
repack layer to resolve the test failure demonstrated in the previous
commit.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git maintenance" starts using the "geometric" strategy by default.
* ps/maintenance-geometric-default:
builtin/maintenance: use "geometric" strategy by default
t7900: prepare for switch of the default strategy
t6500: explicitly use "gc" strategy
t5510: explicitly use "gc" strategy
t5400: explicitly use "gc" strategy
t34xx: don't expire reflogs where it matters
t: disable maintenance where we verify object database structure
t: fix races caused by background maintenance
|
|
We have a couple of tests that explicitly verify the structure of the
object database. Naturally, this structure is dependent on whether or
not we run repository maintenance: if it decides to optimize the object
database the expected structure is likely to not materialize.
Explicitly disable auto-maintenance in such tests so that we are not
dependent on decisions made by our maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The "--stdin-packs" option can be used to merge objects from multiple
packfiles given via stdin into a new packfile. One big upside of this
option is that we don't have to perform a complete rev walk to enumerate
objects. Instead, we can simply enumerate all objects that are part of
the specified packfiles, which can be significantly faster in very large
repositories.
There is one downside though: when we don't perform a rev walk we also
don't have a good way to learn about the respective object's names. As a
consequence, we cannot use the name hashes as a heuristic to get better
delta selection.
We try to offset this downside though by performing a localized rev
walk: we queue all objects that we're about to repack as interesting,
and all objects from excluded packfiles as uninteresting. We then
perform a best-effort rev walk that allows us to fill in object names.
There is one gotcha here though: when "--exclude-promisor-objects" has
not been given we will perform backfill fetches for any promised objects
that are missing. This used to not be an issue though as this option was
mutually exclusive with "--stdin-packs". But that has changed recently,
and starting with dcc9c7ef47 (builtin/repack: handle promisor packs with
geometric repacking, 2026-01-05) we will now repack promisor packs
during geometric compaction. The consequence is that a geometric repack
may now perform a bunch of backfill fetches.
We of course cannot pass "--exclude-promisor-objects" to fix this
issue -- after all, the whole intent is to repack objects part of a
promisor pack. But arguably we don't have to: the rev walk is intended
as best effort, and we already configure it to ignore missing links to
other objects. So we can adapt the walk to unconditionally disable
fetching any missing objects.
Do so and add a test that verifies we don't backfill any objects.
Reported-by: Lukas Wanko <lwanko@gitlab.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It is currently not possible to combine "--exclude-promisor-objects"
with "--stdin-packs" because both flags want to set up a revision walk
to enumerate the objects to pack. In a subsequent commit though we want
to extend geometric repacks to support promisor objects, and for that we
need to handle the combination of both flags.
There are two cases we have to think about here:
- "--stdin-packs" asks us to pack exactly the objects part of the
specified packfiles. It is somewhat questionable what to do in the
case where the user asks us to exclude promisor objects, but at the
same time explicitly passes a promisor pack to us. For now, we
simply abort the request as it is self-contradicting. As we have
also been dying before this commit there is no regression here.
- "--stdin-packs=follow" does the same as the first flag, but it also
asks us to include all objects transitively reachable from any
object in the packs we are about to repack. This is done by doing
the revision walk mentioned further up. Luckily, fixing this case is
trivial: we only need to modify the revision walk to also set the
`exclude_promisor_objects` field.
Note that we do not support the "--exclude-promisor-objects-best-effort"
flag for now as we don't need it to support geometric repacking with
promisor objects.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When invoked with '--stdin-packs', pack-objects will generate a pack
which contains the objects found in the "included" packs, less any
objects from "excluded" packs.
Packs that exist in the repository but weren't specified as either
included or excluded are in practice treated like the latter, at least
in the sense that pack-objects won't include objects from those packs.
This behavior forces us to include any cruft pack(s) in a repository's
multi-pack index for the reasons described in ddee3703b3
(builtin/repack.c: add cruft packs to MIDX during geometric repack,
2022-05-20).
The full details are in ddee3703b3, but the gist is if you
have a once-unreachable object in a cruft pack which later becomes
reachable via one or more commits in a pack generated with
'--stdin-packs', you *have* to include that object in the MIDX via the
copy in the cruft pack, otherwise we cannot generate reachability
bitmaps for any commits which reach that object.
Note that the traversal here is best-effort, similar to the existing
traversal which provides name-hash hints. This means that the object
traversal may hand us back a blob that does not actually exist. We
*won't* see missing trees/commits with 'ignore_missing_links' because:
- missing commit parents are discarded at the commit traversal stage by
revision.c::process_parents()
- missing tag objects are discarded by revision.c::handle_commit()
- missing tree objects are discarded by the list-objects code in
list-objects.c::process_tree()
But we have to handle potentially-missing blobs specially by making a
separate check to ensure they exist in the repository. Failing to do so
would mean that we'd add an object to the packing list which doesn't
actually exist, rendering us unable to write out the pack.
This prepares us for new repacking behavior which will "resurrect"
objects found in cruft or otherwise unspecified packs when generating
new packs. In the context of geometric repacking, this may be used to
maintain a sequence of geometrically-repacked packs, the union of which
is closed under reachability, even in the case described earlier.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
pack-objects has a handful of explicit checks for pairs of command-line
options which are mutually incompatible. Many of these pre-date
a699367bb8 (i18n: factorize more 'incompatible options' messages,
2022-01-31).
Convert the explicit checks into die_for_incompatible_opt2() calls,
which simplifies the implementation and standardizes pack-objects'
output when given incompatible options (e.g., --stdin-packs with
--filter gives different output than --keep-unreachable with
--unpack-unreachable).
There is one minor piece of test fallout in t5331 that expects the old
format, which has been corrected.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there
is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests.
Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the
only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to
test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are
callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to
other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep.
This patch was produced more or less with
git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' |
xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /'
and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the
above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate
test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree
contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit.
You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected,
in addition to the manual reproduction.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We don't have any tests that verify that git-pack-objects(1) works with
`--stdin-packs` when combined with alternate object directories. Add
some to make sure that the basic functionality works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When passing the same packfile both as included and excluded via the
`--stdin-packs` option, then we will return an error because the
excluded packfile cannot be found. This is because we will only set the
`util` pointer for the included packfile list if it was found, so that
we later die when we notice that it's in fact not set for the excluded
packfile list.
Fix this bug by always setting the `util` pointer for both the included
and excluded list entries.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When passed the same packfile twice via `--stdin-packs` we return an
error that the packfile supposedly was not found. This is because when
reading packs into the list of included or excluded packfiles, we will
happily re-add packfiles even if they are part of the lists already. And
while the list can now contain duplicates, we will only set the `util`
pointer of the first list entry to the `packed_git` structure. We notice
that at a later point when checking that all list entries have their
`util` pointer set and die with an error.
While this is kind of a nonsensical request, this scenario can be hit
when doing geometric repacks. When a repository is connected to an
alternate object directory and both have the exact same packfile then
both would get added to the geometric sequence. And when we then decide
to perform the repack, we will invoke git-pack-objects(1) with the same
packfile twice.
Fix this bug by removing any duplicates from both the included and
excluded packs.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The test suite for git-pack-objects(1) is quite huge, and we're about to
add more tests that relate to the `--stdin-packs` option. Split out all
tests related to this option into a standalone file so that it becomes
easier to test the feature in isolation.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
