aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
11 daysMerge branch 'ps/dash-buggy-0.5.13-workaround'Junio C Hamano
The way dash 0.5.13 handles non-ASCII contents in here-doc is buggy and breaks our existing tests, which unfortunately have been rewritten to avoid triggering the bug. * ps/dash-buggy-0.5.13-workaround: t9300: work around partial read bug in Dash v0.5.13 t: work around multibyte bug in quoted heredocs with Dash v0.5.13
12 dayst: work around multibyte bug in quoted heredocs with Dash v0.5.13Patrick Steinhardt
When executing our test suite with Dash v0.5.13.2 one can observe several test failures that all have the same symptoms: we have a quoted heredoc that contains multibyte characters, but the final data does not match what we actually wanted to write. One such example is in t0300, where we see the diffs like the following: --- expect-stdout 2026-04-01 07:25:45.249919440 +0000 +++ stdout 2026-04-01 07:25:45.254919509 +0000 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ protocol=https host=example.com -path=perú.git +path=perú.git username=foo password=bar While seemingly the same, the data that we've written via the heredoc contains some invisible bytes. The expected hex representation of the string is: 7065 72c3 ba2e 6769 74 per...git But what we actually get instead is this string: 7065 7285 02c3 ba02 852e 6769 74 per.......git What's important to note here is that the multibyte character exists in both versions. But in the broken version we see that the bytes are wrapped in a sequence of "85 02" and "02 85". This is the CTLMBCHAR byte sequence of Dash, which it uses internally to quote multibyte sequences. As it turns out, this bug was introduced in c5bf970 (expand: Add multi-byte support to pmatch, 2024-06-02), which adds multibyte support to more contexts of Dash. One of these contexts seems to be in heredocs, and Dash _does_ correctly unquote these multibyte sequences when using an unquoted heredoc. But the bug seems to be that this unquoting does not happen in quoted heredocs, and the bug still exists on the latest "master" branch. For now, work around the bug by using unquoted heredocs instead. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-03-23format-patch: --commit-list-format without prefixMirko Faina
Having to prefix a custom format-string with "log:" when passed from the CLI can be annoying. It would be great if this prefix wasn't required. Teach make_cover_letter() to accept custom format-strings without the "log:" prefix if a placeholder is detected. Note that both here and in "git log --format" the check is done naively by just checking for the presence of a '%'. Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-03-23format-patch: add preset for --commit-list-formatMirko Faina
"git format-patch --commit-list-format" enables the user to make their own format for the commit list in the cover letter. It would be nice to have a ready to use format to replace shortlog. Teach make_cover_letter() the "modern" format preset. This new format is the same as: "log:[%(count)/%(total)] %s". Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-03-23format.commitListFormat: strip meaning from emptyMirko Faina
The configuration variable format.commitListFormat allows for an empty value. This is unusual and can create issues when interacting with this configuration variable through the CLI. Strip meaning to format.commitListFormat with an empty value. Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-03-23format-patch: rename --cover-letter-format optionMirko Faina
To align the name of the configuration variable and the name of the command line option, either one should change name. By changing the name of the option we get the added benefit of having --cover-<TAB> expand to --cover-letter without ambiguity. If the user gives the --cover-letter-format option it would be reasonable to expect that the user wants to generate the cover letter despite not giving --cover-letter. Rename --cover-letter-format to --commit-list-format and make it imply --cover-letter unless --no-cover-letter is given. Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-03-16Merge branch 'mf/format-patch-cover-letter-format' into ↵Junio C Hamano
mf/format-patch-commit-list-format * mf/format-patch-cover-letter-format: docs: add usage for the cover-letter fmt feature format-patch: add commitListFormat config format-patch: add ability to use alt cover format format-patch: move cover letter summary generation pretty.c: add %(count) and %(total) placeholders
2026-03-10Merge branch 'kh/format-patch-noprefix-is-boolean'Junio C Hamano
The configuration variable format.noprefix did not behave as a proper boolean variable, which has now been fixed and documented. * kh/format-patch-noprefix-is-boolean: doc: diff-options.adoc: make *.noprefix split translatable doc: diff-options.adoc: show format.noprefix for format-patch format-patch: make format.noprefix a boolean
2026-03-06format-patch: add commitListFormat configMirko Faina
Using "--cover-letter" we can tell format-patch to generate a cover letter, in this cover letter there's a list of commits included in the patch series and the format is specified by the "--cover-letter-format" option. Would be useful if this format could be configured from the config file instead of always needing to pass it from the command line. Teach format-patch how to read the format spec for the cover letter from the config files. The variable it should look for is called format.commitListFormat. Possible values: - commitListFormat is set but no string is passed: it will default to "[%(count)/%(total)] %s" - if a string is passed: will use it as a format spec. Note that this is either "shortlog" or a format spec prefixed by "log:" e.g."log:%s (%an)" - if commitListFormat is not set: it will default to the shortlog format. Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-03-06format-patch: add ability to use alt cover formatMirko Faina
Often when sending patch series there's a need to clarify to the reviewer what's the purpose of said series, since it might be difficult to understand it from reading the commits messages one by one. "git format-patch" provides the useful "--cover-letter" flag to declare if we want it to generate a template for us to use. By default it will generate a "git shortlog" of the changes, which developers find less useful than they'd like, mainly because the shortlog groups commits by author, and gives no obvious chronological order. Give format-patch the ability to specify an alternative format spec through the "--cover-letter-format" option. This option either takes "shortlog", which is the current format, or a format spec prefixed with "log:". Example: git format-patch --cover-letter \ --cover-letter-format="log:[%(count)/%(total)] %s (%an)" HEAD~3 [1/3] this is a commit summary (Mirko Faina) [2/3] this is another commit summary (Mirko Faina) ... Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-02-23format-patch: make format.noprefix a booleanKristoffer Haugsbakk
The config `format.noprefix` was added in 8d5213de (format-patch: add format.noprefix option, 2023-03-09) to support no-prefix on paths. That was immediately after making git-format-patch(1) not respect `diff.noprefix`.[1] The intent was to mirror `diff.noprefix`. But this config was unintentionally[2] implemented by enabling no-prefix if any kind of value is set. † 1: c169af8f (format-patch: do not respect diff.noprefix, 2023-03-09) † 2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260211073553.GA1867915@coredump.intra.peff.net/ Let’s indeed mirror `diff.noprefix` by treating it as a boolean. This is a breaking change. And as far as breaking changes go it is pretty benign: • The documentation claims that this config is equivalent to `diff.noprefix`; this is just a bug fix if the documentation is what defines the application interface • Only users with non-boolean values will run into problems when we try to parse it as a boolean. But what would (1) make them suspect they could do that in the first place, and (2) have motivated them to do it? • Users who have set this to `false` and expect that to mean *enable format.noprefix* (current behavior) will now have the opposite experience. Which is not a reasonable setup. Let’s only offer a breaking change fig leaf by advising about the previous behavior before dying. Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-02-17format-patch: fix From header in cover letterMirko Faina
"git format-patch" takes "--from=<user ident>" command line option and uses the given ident for patch e-mails, but this is not applied to the cover letter, the option is ignored and the committer ident of the current user is used. This has been the case ever since "--from" was introduced in a9080475 (teach format-patch to place other authors into in-body "From", 2013-07-03). Teach the make_cover_letter() function to honor the option, instead of always using the current committer identity. Change variable name from "committer" to "from" to better reflect the purpose of the variable. Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2025-12-14t4014: support Git version strings with spacesRené Scharfe
git --version reports its version with the prefix "git version ". Remove precisely this string instead of everything up to and including the rightmost space to avoid butchering version strings that contain spaces. This helps Apple's release of Git, which reports its version like this: "git version 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)". Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2025-04-07t: introduce PERL_TEST_HELPERS prerequisitePatrick Steinhardt
In the early days of Git, Perl was used quite prominently throughout the project. This has changed significantly as almost all of the executables we ship nowadays have eventually been rewritten in C. Only a handful of subsystems remain that require Perl: - gitweb, a read-only web interface. - A couple of scripts that allow importing repositories from GNU Arch, CVS and Subversion. - git-send-email(1), which can be used to send mails. - git-request-pull(1), which is used to request somebody to pull from a URL by sending an email. - git-filter-branch(1), which uses Perl with the `--state-branch` option. This command is typically recommended against nowadays in favor of git-filter-repo(1). - Our Perl bindings for Git. - The netrc Git credential helper. None of these subsystems can really be considered to be part of the "core" of Git, and an installation without them is fully functional. It is more likely than not that an end user wouldn't even notice that any features are missing if those tools weren't installed. But while Perl nowadays very much is an optional dependency of Git, there is a significant limitation when Perl isn't available: developers cannot run our test suite. Preceding commits have started to lift this restriction by removing the strict dependency on Perl in many central parts of the test library. But there are still many tests that rely on small Perl helpers to do various different things. Introduce a new PERL_TEST_HELPERS prerequisite that guards all tests that require Perl. This prerequisite is explicitly different than the preexisting PERL prerequisite: - PERL records whether or not features depending on the Perl interpreter are built. - PERL_TEST_HELPERS records whether or not a Perl interpreter is available for our tests. By having these two separate prerequisites we can thus distinguish between tests that inherently depend on Perl because the underlying feature does, and those tests that depend on Perl because the test itself is using Perl. Adapt all tests to set the PERL_TEST_HELPERS prerequisite as needed. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-11-21t: remove TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK annotationsPatrick Steinhardt
Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-08-14builtin/format-patch: fix various trivial memory leaksPatrick Steinhardt
There are various memory leaks hit by git-format-patch(1). Basically all of them are trivial, except that un-setting `diffopt.no_free` requires us to unset the `diffopt.file` because we manually close it already. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-06-20Merge branch 'rj/format-patch-auto-cover-with-interdiff'Junio C Hamano
"git format-patch --interdiff" for multi-patch series learned to turn on cover letters automatically (unless told never to enable cover letter with "--no-cover-letter" and such). * rj/format-patch-auto-cover-with-interdiff: format-patch: assume --cover-letter for diff in multi-patch series t4014: cleanups in a few tests
2024-06-07format-patch: assume --cover-letter for diff in multi-patch seriesRubén Justo
When we deal with a multi-patch series in git-format-patch(1), if we see `--interdiff` or `--range-diff` but no `--cover-letter`, we return with an error, saying: fatal: --range-diff requires --cover-letter or single patch or: fatal: --interdiff requires --cover-letter or single patch This makes sense because the cover-letter is where we place the diff from the previous version. However, considering that `format-patch` generates a multi-patch as needed, let's adopt a similar "cover as necessary" approach when using `--interdiff` or `--range-diff`. Therefore, relax the requirement for an explicit `--cover-letter` in a multi-patch series when the user says `--iterdiff` or `--range-diff`. Still, if only to return the error, respect "format.coverLetter=no" and `--no-cover-letter`. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-06-07t4014: cleanups in a few testsRubén Justo
Arrange things we are going to create to be removed at end, and then start creating them. That way, we will clean them up even if we fail after creating some but before the end of the command. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-05-24format-patch: move range/inter diff at the end of a single patch outputJunio C Hamano
When running "format-patch" on a multiple patch series, the output coming from "--interdiff" and "--range-diff" options is inserted after the "shortlog" list of commits and the overall diffstat. The idea is that shortlog/diffstat are shorter and with denser information content, which gives a better overview before the readers dive into more details of range/inter diff. When working on a single patch, however, we stuff the inter/range diff output before the actual patch, next to the diffstat. This pushes down the patch text way down with inter/range diff output, distracting readers. Move the inter/range diff output to the very end of the output, after all the patch text is shown. As the inter/range diff is no longer part of the commentary block (i.e., what comes after the log message and "---", but before the patch text), stop producing "---" in the function that generates them. But to separate it out visually (note: this is not needed to help tools like "git apply" that pay attention to the hunk headers to figure out the length of the hunks), add an extra blank line between the end of the patch text and the inter/range diff. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-04-30Merge branch 'jc/format-patch-rfc-more'Junio C Hamano
The "--rfc" option of "git format-patch" learned to take an optional string value to be used in place of "RFC" to tweak the "[PATCH]" on the subject header. * jc/format-patch-rfc-more: format-patch: "--rfc=-(WIP)" appends to produce [PATCH (WIP)] format-patch: allow --rfc to optionally take a value, like --rfc=WIP
2024-04-30Merge branch 'ds/format-patch-rfc-and-k'Junio C Hamano
The "-k" and "--rfc" options of "format-patch" will now error out when used together, as one tells us not to add anything to the title of the commit, and the other one tells us to add "RFC" in addition to "PATCH". * ds/format-patch-rfc-and-k: format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
2024-04-23format-patch: "--rfc=-(WIP)" appends to produce [PATCH (WIP)]Junio C Hamano
In the previous step, the "--rfc" option of "format-patch" learned to take an optional string value to prepend to the subject prefix, so that --rfc=WIP can give "[WIP PATCH]". There may be cases in which the extra string wants to come after the subject prefix. Extend the mechanism to allow "--rfc=-(WIP)" [*] to signal that the extra string is to be appended instead of getting prepended, resulting in "[PATCH (WIP)]". In the documentation, discourage (ab)using "--rfc=-RFC" to say "[PATCH RFC]" just to be different, when "[RFC PATCH]" is the norm. [Footnote] * The syntax takes inspiration from Perl's open syntax that opens pipes "open fh, '|-', 'cmd'", where the dash signals "the other stuff comes here". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-04-23format-patch: allow --rfc to optionally take a value, like --rfc=WIPJunio C Hamano
With the "--rfc" option, we can tweak the "[PATCH]" (or whatever string specified with the "--subject-prefix" option, instead of "PATCH") that we prefix the title of the commit with into "[RFC PATCH]", but some projects may want "[rfc PATCH]". Adding a new option, e.g., "--rfc-lowercase", to support such need every time somebody wants to use different strings would lead to insanity of accumulating unbounded number of such options. Allow an optional value specified for the option, so that users can use "--rfc=rfc" (think of "--rfc" without value as a short-hand for "--rfc=RFC") if they wanted to. This can of course be (ab)used to make the prefix "[WIP PATCH]" by passing "--rfc=WIP". Passing an empty string, i.e., "--rfc=", is the same as "--no-rfc" to override an option given earlier on the same command line. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-04-19format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusiveDragan Simic
Fix a bug that allows the "--rfc" and "-k" options to be specified together when "git format-patch" is executed, which was introduced in the commit e0d7db7423a9 ("format-patch: --rfc honors what --subject-prefix sets"). Add a couple of additional tests to t4014, to cover additional cases of the mutual exclusivity between different "git format-patch" options. Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-10format-patch: fix ignored encode_email_headers for cover letterSimon Ser
When writing the cover letter, the encode_email_headers option was ignored. That is, UTF-8 subject lines and email addresses were written out as-is, without any Q-encoding, even if --encode-email-headers was passed on the command line. This is due to encode_email_headers not being copied over from struct rev_info to struct pretty_print_context. Fix that and add a test. Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-08Merge branch 'jc/test-i18ngrep'Junio C Hamano
Another step to deprecate test_i18ngrep. * jc/test-i18ngrep: tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grep test framework: further deprecate test_i18ngrep
2023-11-02tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grepJunio C Hamano
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep. This patch was produced more or less with git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' | xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /' and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit. You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected, in addition to the manual reproduction. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-09-07Merge branch 'dd/format-patch-rfc-updates'Junio C Hamano
"git format-patch --rfc --subject-prefix=<foo>" used to ignore the "--subject-prefix" option and used "[RFC PATCH]"; now we will add "RFC" prefix to whatever subject prefix is specified. This is a backward compatible change that may deserve a note. * dd/format-patch-rfc-updates: format-patch: --rfc honors what --subject-prefix sets
2023-08-31format-patch: --rfc honors what --subject-prefix setsDrew DeVault
Rather than replacing the configured subject prefix (either through the git config or command line) entirely with "RFC PATCH", this change prepends RFC to whatever subject prefix was already in use. This is useful, for example, when a user is working on a repository that has a subject prefix considered to disambiguate patches: git config format.subjectPrefix 'PATCH my-project' Prior to this change, formatting patches with --rfc would lose the 'my-project' information. The data flow for the subject-prefix was that rev.subject_prefix were to be kept the authoritative version of the subject prefix even while parsing command line options, and sprefix variable was used as a temporary area to futz with it. Now, the parsing code has been refactored to build the subject prefix into the sprefix variable and assigns its value at the end to rev.subject_prefix, which makes the flow easier to grasp. Signed-off-by: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-08-21format-patch: add --description-file optionOswald Buddenhagen
This patch makes it possible to directly feed a branch description to derive the cover letter from. The use case is formatting dynamically created temporary commits which are not referenced anywhere. The most obvious alternative would be creating a temporary branch and setting a description on it, but that doesn't seem particularly elegant. Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-21Merge branch 'ah/format-patch-thread-doc'Junio C Hamano
Doc update. * ah/format-patch-thread-doc: format-patch: correct documentation of --thread without an argument
2023-04-11Merge branch 'jc/spell-id-in-both-caps-in-message-id'Junio C Hamano
Consistently spell "Message-ID" as such, not "Message-Id". * jc/spell-id-in-both-caps-in-message-id: e-mail workflow: Message-ID is spelled with ID in both capital letters
2023-04-03format-patch: correct documentation of --thread without an argumentAlex Henrie
In Git, almost all command line flags unconditionally override the corresponding config option.[1] Add a test to confirm that this is the case for `git format-patch --thread`. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAMMLpeS3+NUQa2oqpHKVo3yWQNVMgkEXrs4U5_ggvk31yQbezQ@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-04-03e-mail workflow: Message-ID is spelled with ID in both capital lettersJunio C Hamano
We used to write "Message-Id:" and "Message-ID:" pretty much interchangeably, and the header name is defined to be case insensitive by the RFCs, but the canonical form "Message-ID:" is used throughout the RFC documents, so let's imitate it ourselves. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
2023-03-21Merge branch 'jk/format-patch-ignore-noprefix'Junio C Hamano
"git format-patch" honors the src/dst prefixes set to nonstandard values with configuration variables like "diff.noprefix", causing receiving end of the patch that expects the standard -p1 format to break. Teach "format-patch" to ignore end-user configuration and always use the standard prefixes. This is a backward compatibility breaking change. * jk/format-patch-ignore-noprefix: rebase: prefer --default-prefix to --{src,dst}-prefix for format-patch format-patch: add format.noprefix option format-patch: do not respect diff.noprefix diff: add --default-prefix option t4013: add tests for diff prefix options diff: factor out src/dst prefix setup
2023-03-09format-patch: add format.noprefix optionJeff King
The previous commit dropped support for diff.noprefix in format-patch. While this will do the right thing in most cases (where sending patches without a prefix was an accidental side effect of the sender preferring to see their local patches without prefixes), it left no good option for a project or workflow where you really do want to send patches without prefixes. You'd be stuck using "--no-prefix" for every invocation. So let's add a config option specific to format-patch that enables this behavior. That gives people who have such a workflow a way to get what they want, but makes it hard to accidentally trigger it. A more backwards-compatible way of doing the transition would be to have format.noprefix default to diff.noprefix when it's not set. But that doesn't really help the "accidental" problem; people would have to manually set format.noprefix=false. And it's unlikely that anybody really wants format.noprefix=true in the first place. I'm adding it here mostly as an escape hatch, not because anybody has expressed any interest in it. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-03-09format-patch: do not respect diff.noprefixJeff King
The output of format-patch respects diff.noprefix, but this usually ends up being a hassle for people receiving the patch, as they have to manually specify "-p0" in order to apply it. I don't think there was any specific intention for it to behave this way. The noprefix option is handled by git_diff_ui_config(), and format-patch exists in a gray area between plumbing and porcelain. People do look at the output, and we'd expect it to colorize things, respect their choice of algorithm, and so on. But this particular option creates problems for the receiver (in theory so does diff.mnemonicprefix, but since we are always formatting commits, the mnemonic prefixes will always be "a/" and "b/"). So let's disable it. The slight downsides are: - people who have set diff.noprefix presumably like to see their patches without prefixes. If they use format-patch to review their series, they'll see prefixes. On the other hand, it is probably a good idea for them to look at what will actually get sent out. We could try to play games here with "is stdout a tty", as we do for color. But that's not a completely reliable signal, and it's probably not worth the trouble. If you want to see the patch with the usual bells and whistles, then you are better off using "git log" or "git show". - if a project really does have a workflow that likes prefix-less patches, and the receiver is prepared to use "-p0", then the sender now has to manually say "--no-prefix" for each format-patch invocation. That doesn't seem _too_ terrible given that the receiver has to manually say "-p0" for each git-am invocation. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-03-03format-patch: output header for empty commitsJohn Keeping
When formatting an empty commit, it is surprising that a totally empty file is generated. Set the flag to always print the header, matching the behaviour of git-log. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-17format.attach: allow empty value to disable multi-part messagesJunio C Hamano
When a lower precedence configuration file (e.g. /etc/gitconfig) defines format.attach in any way, there was no way to disable it in a more specific configuration file (e.g. $HOME/.gitconfig). Change the behaviour of setting it to an empty string. It used to mean that the result is still a multipart message with only dashes used as a multi-part separator, but now it resets the setting to the default (which would be to give an inline patch, unless other command line options are in effect). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-12-25format-patch: support format.mboxrd with --stdoutEric Wong
mboxrd is a more robust output format when used with --stdout and needs more exposure. Introducing this config knob lets users choose the more robust format for all their --stdout uses. Relying on --pretty=mboxrd and including all of pretty-formats.txt in the `git format-patch' documentation would likely be confusing to users. Furthermore, this setting is useful across multiple invocations. So introduce `format.mboxrd' as a boolean configuration knob that changes the default --pretty=email format to --pretty=mboxrd when (and only when) --stdout is in use. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-09-21t: convert egrep usage to "grep -E"Đoàn Trần Công Danh
Despite POSIX states that: > The old egrep and fgrep commands are likely to be supported for many > years to come as implementation extensions, allowing historical > applications to operate unmodified. GNU grep 3.8 started to warn[1]: > The egrep and fgrep commands, which have been deprecated since > release 2.5.3 (2007), now warn that they are obsolescent and should > be replaced by grep -E and grep -F. Prepare for their removal in the future. [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2022-09/msg00001.html Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-08-29format-patch: learn format.forceInBodyFrom configuration variableJunio C Hamano
As the need to use the "--force-in-body-from" option primarily is tied to which mailing list the mails go to (and get their From: address mangled), it is likely that a user who needs to use this option once to interact with their upstream project needs to use it for all patches they send out. Add a configuration variable, suitable for setting in the local configuration file per repository, for this. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-08-29format-patch: allow forcing the use of in-body From: headerJunio C Hamano
Users may be authoring and committing their commits under the same e-mail address they use to send their patches from, in which case they shouldn't need to use the in-body From: line in their outgoing e-mails. At the receiving end, "git am" will use the address on the "From:" header of the incoming e-mail and all should be well. Some mailing lists, however, mangle the From: address from what the original sender had; in such a situation, the user may want to add the in-body "From:" header even for their own patches. "git format-patch --[no-]force-in-body-from" was invented for such users. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-04-302.36 format-patch regression fixRené Scharfe
e900d494dc (diff: add an API for deferred freeing, 2021-02-11) added a way to allow reusing diffopts: the no_free bit. 244c27242f (diff.[ch]: have diff_free() call clear_pathspec(opts.pathspec), 2022-02-16) made that mechanism mandatory. git format-patch only sets no_free when --output is given, causing it to forget pathspecs after the first commit. Set no_free unconditionally instead. The existing test was unable to detect this breakage because it checks stderr for the absence of a certain string, but format-patch writes to stdout. Also the test was not checking the case of one commit modifying multiple files and a pathspec limiting the diff. Replace it with a more thorough one. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-13t4000-t4999: detect and signal failure within loopEric Sunshine
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells). Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-13tests: use test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented outputEric Sunshine
Take advantage of test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented output rather than using for-loops or a series of `echo` commands. Not only is test_write_lines() a natural fit for such a task, but there is less opportunity for a broken &&-chain. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-03-23format-patch: allow a non-integral version numbersZheNing Hu
The `-v<n>` option of `format-patch` can give nothing but an integral iteration number to patches in a series.  Some people, however, prefer to mark a new iteration with only a small fixup with a non integral iteration number (e.g. an "oops, that was wrong" fix-up patch for v4 iteration may be labeled as "v4.1"). Allow `format-patch` to take such a non-integral iteration number. `<n>` can be any string, such as '3.1' or '4rev2'. In the case where it is a non-integral value, the "Range-diff" and "Interdiff" headers will not include the previous version. Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-10tests: remove most uses of test_i18ncmpÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
As a follow-up to d162b25f956 (tests: remove support for GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON, 2021-01-20) remove most uses of test_i18ncmp via a simple s/test_i18ncmp/test_cmp/g search-replacement. I'm leaving t6300-for-each-ref.sh out due to a conflict with in-flight changes between "master" and "seen", as well as the prerequisite itself due to other changes between "master" and "next/seen" which add new test_i18ncmp uses. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-25Merge branch 'js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch'Junio C Hamano
Prepare tests not to be affected by the name of the default branch "git init" creates. * js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch: (28 commits) tests: drop prereq `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` where no longer needed t99*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" tests(git-p4): transition to the default branch name `main` t9[5-7]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t9[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t8*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t7[5-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t7[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t6[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t64*: preemptively adjust alignment to prepare for `master` -> `main` t6[0-3]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t5[6-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t55[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t55[23]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t551*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t550*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t5503: prepare aligned comment for replacing `master` with `main` t5[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t5323: prepare centered comment for `master` -> `main` t4*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" ...