| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
"git add -p" learned a new mode that allows the user to revisit a
file that was already dealt with.
* aa/add-p-no-auto-advance:
add-patch: allow interfile navigation when selecting hunks
add-patch: allow all-or-none application of patches
add-patch: modify patch_update_file() signature
interactive -p: add new `--auto-advance` flag
|
|
After deciding on all hunks in a file, the interactive session
advances automatically to the next file if there is another,
or the process ends.
Now using the `--no-auto-advance` flag with `--patch`, the process
does not advance automatically. A user can choose to go to the next
file by pressing '>' or the previous file by pressing '<', before or
after deciding on all hunks in the current file.
After all hunks have been decided in a file, the user can still
rework with the file by applying the options available in the permit
set for that hunk, and after all the decisions, the user presses 'q'
to submit.
After all hunks have been decided, the user can press '?' which will
show the hunk selection summary in the help patch remainder text
including the total hunks, number of hunks marked for use and number
of hunks marked for skip.
This feature is enabled by passing the `--no-auto-advance` flag
to `--patch` option of the subcommands add, stash, reset,
and checkout.
Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a user is interactively deciding which hunks to use or skip for
staging, unstaging, stashing etc, there is no way to know the
decision previously chosen for a hunk when navigating through the
previous and next hunks using K/J respectively.
Improve the UI to explicitly show if a user has previously decided to
use a hunk (by pressing 'y') or skip the hunk (by pressing 'n').
This will improve clarity when and aid the navigation process for the
user.
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If we reach the end of the input, e.g. because the user pressed ctrl-D
on Linux, there is no point in showing any more prompts, as we won't get
any reply. Do the same as option 'q' would: Quit.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Show 'P'ipe command in "git add -p".
* rs/add-patch-document-p-for-pager:
add-patch: fully document option P
|
|
Show option P in the prompt and explain it properly on a dedicated line
in online help and documentation.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The code in "git add -p" and friends to iterate over hunks was
riddled with bugs, which has been corrected.
* rs/add-patch-options-fix:
add-patch: reset "permitted" at loop start
add-patch: let options a and d roll over like y and n
add-patch: let options k and K roll over like j and J
add-patch: let options y, n, j, and e roll over to next undecided
add-patch: document that option J rolls over
add-patch: improve help for options j, J, k, and K
|
|
Marking a hunk 'selected' in "git add -p" and then splitting made
all the split pieces 'selected'; this has been changed to make them
all 'undecided', which gives better end-user experience.
* pw/add-p-hunk-splitting-fix:
add-patch: update hunk splitability after editing
add -p: mark split hunks as undecided
|
|
Don't accumulate allowed options from any visited hunks, start fresh at
the top of the loop instead and only record the allowed options for the
current hunk.
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Options a and d stage and unstage all undecided hunks towards the bottom
of the array of hunks, respectively, and then roll over to the very
first hunk. The first part is similar to y and n if the current hunk is
the last one in the array, but they roll over to the next undecided
hunk if there is any. That's more useful; do it for a and d as well.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Options j and J roll over at the bottom and go to the first undecided
hunk and hunk 1, respectively. Let options k and K do the same when
they reach the top of the hunk array, so let them go to the last
undecided hunk and the last hunk, respectively, for consistency. Also
use the same direction-neutral error messages.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The options y, n, and e mark the current hunk as decided. If there's
another undecided hunk towards the bottom of the hunk array they go
there. If there isn't, but there is another undecided hunk towards the
top then they go to the very first hunk, no matter if it has already
been decided on.
The option j does basically the same move. Technically it is not
allowed if there's no undecided hunk towards the bottom, but the
variable "permitted" is never reset, so this permission is retained
from the very first hunk. That may a bug, but this behavior is at
least consistent with y, n, and e and arguably more useful than
refusing to move.
Improve the roll-over behavior of these four options by moving to the
first undecided hunk instead of hunk 1, consistent with what they do
when not rolling over.
Also adjust the error message for j, as it will only be shown if
there's no other undecided hunk in either direction.
Reported-by: Windl, Ulrich <u.windl@ukr.de>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The variable "permitted" is not reset after moving to a different hunk,
so it only accumulates permission and doesn't necessarily reflect those
of the current hunk. This may be a bug, but is actually useful with the
option J, which can be used at the last hunk to roll over to the first
hunk. Make this particular behavior official.
Also adjust the error message, as it will only be shown if there's just
a single hunk.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If, when the user edits a hunk, they change deletion lines into
context lines or vice versa, then the number of hunks that the edited
hunk can be split into may differ from the unedited hunk. This means
that so we should recalculate `hunk->splittable_into` after the hunk
has been edited. In practice users are unlikely to hit this bug as it
is doubtful that a user who has edited a hunk will split it afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a hunk is split, each of the new hunks inherits whether it is
selected or not from the original hunk. If a selected hunk is split
all of the new hunks are marked as "selected" and the user is only
prompted with the first of the split hunks. The user is not asked
whether or not they wish to select the rest of the new hunks. This
means that if they wish to deselect any of the new hunks apart from
the first one they have to navigate back to the hunk they want to
deselect before they can deselect it. This is unfortunate as the user
is presumably splitting the original hunk because they only want to
select some sub-set of it.
Instead mark all the new hunks as "undecided" so that the user is
prompted whether they wish to select each one in turn. In the case
where the user only wants to change the selection of the first of
the split hunks they will now have to do more work re-selecting the
remaining split hunks. However, changing the selection of any of the
other newly created hunks is now much simpler as the user no-longer has
to navigate back to them in order to change their selected state.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Color options like color.interactive and color.diff should fall back to
the value of color.ui if they aren't set. In add-interactive, we check
the specific options (e.g., color.diff) via repo_config_get_value(),
which does not depend on the main command having loaded any color config
via the git_config() callback mechanism.
But then we call want_color() on the result; if our specific config is
unset then that function uses the value of git_use_color_default. That
variable is typically set from color.ui by the git_color_config()
callback, which is called by the main command in its own git_config()
callback function.
This works fine for "add -p", whose add_config() callback calls into
git_color_config(). But it doesn't work for other commands like
"checkout -p", which is otherwise unaware of color at all. People tend
not to notice because the default is "auto", and that's what they'd set
color.ui to as well. But something like:
git -c color.ui=false checkout -p
should disable color, and it doesn't.
This regression goes back to 0527ccb1b5 (add -i: default to the built-in
implementation, 2021-11-30). In the perl version we got the color config
from "git config --get-colorbool", which did the full lookup for us.
The obvious fix is for git-checkout to add a call to git_color_config()
to its own config callback. But we'd have to do so for every command
with this problem, which is error-prone. Let's see if we can fix it more
centrally.
It is tempting to teach want_color() to look up the value of
repo_config_get_value("color.ui") itself. But I think that would have
disastrous consequences. Plumbing commands, especially older ones, avoid
porcelain config like "color.*" by simply not parsing it in their config
callbacks. Looking up the value of color.ui under the hood would
undermine that.
Instead, let's do that lookup in the add-interactive setup code. We're
already demand-loading other color config there, which is probably fine
(even in a plumbing command like "git reset", the interactive mode is
inherently porcelain-ish). That catches all commands that use the
interactive code, whether they were calling git_color_config()
themselves or not.
Reported-by: Isaac Oscar Gariano <isaacoscar@live.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The old perl git-add--interactive.perl script used the color.diff config
option to decide whether to color diffs (and if not set, it fell back to
the value of color.ui via git-config's --get-colorbool option). When we
switched to the builtin version, this was lost: we respect only
color.ui. So for example:
git -c color.diff=false add -p
would color the diff, even when it should not.
The culprit is this line in add-interactive.c's parse_diff():
if (want_color_fd(1, -1))
That "-1" means "no config has been set", which causes it to fall back
to the color.ui setting. We should instead be passing the value of
color.diff. But the problem is that we never even parse that config
option!
Instead the builtin interactive code parses only the value of
color.interactive, which is used for prompts and other messages. One
could perhaps argue that this should cover interactive diff coloring,
too, but historically it did not. The perl script treated
color.interactive and color.diff separately. So we should grab the
values for both, keeping separate fields in our add_i_state variable,
rather than a single use_color field.
We also load individual color slots (e.g., color.interactive.prompt),
leaving them as the empty string when color is disabled. This happens
via the init_color() helper in add-interactive, which checks that
use_color field. Now that there are two such fields, we need to pass the
appropriate one for each color.
The colors are mostly easy to divide up; color.interactive.* follows
color.interactive, and color.diff.* follows color.diff. But the "reset"
color is tricky. It is used for both types of coloring, but the two can
be configured independently. So we introduce two separate reset colors,
and use each in the appropriate spot.
There are two new tests. The first enables interactive prompt colors but
disables color.diff. We should see a colored prompt but not a colored
diff, showing that we are now respecting color.diff (and not
color.interactive or color.ui).
The second does the opposite. We disable color.interactive but turn on
color.diff with a custom fragment color. When we split a hunk, the
interactive code has to re-color the hunk header, which lets us check
that we correctly loaded the color.diff.frag config based on color.diff,
not color.interactive.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This patch compliments the previous commit, where builtins that use
add-patch infrastructure now respect diff.context and
diff.interHunkContext file configurations.
In particular, this patch helps users who don't want to set persistent
context configurations or just want a way to override them on a one-time
basis, by allowing the relevant builtins to accept corresponding command
line options that override the file configurations.
This mimics commands such as diff and log, which allow for both context
file configuration and command line overrides.
Signed-off-by: Leon Michalak <leonmichalak6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Various builtins that use add-patch infrastructure do not respect
the user's diff.context and diff.interHunkContext file configurations.
The user may be used to seeing their diffs with customized context size,
but not in the patches "git add -p" shows them to pick from.
Teach add-patch infrastructure to read these configuration variables and
pass their values when spawning the underlying plumbing commands as
their command line option.
Signed-off-by: Leon Michalak <leonmichalak6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
As a preparatory clean-up, use the "test_grep" test utility instead of
regular "grep" which provides better debug information if tests fail.
Signed-off-by: Leon Michalak <leonmichalak6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there
is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests.
Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A 'P' command to "git add -p" that passes the patch hunk to the
pager has been added.
* rj/add-p-pager:
add-patch: render hunks through the pager
pager: introduce wait_for_pager
pager: do not close fd 2 unnecessarily
add-patch: test for 'p' command
|
|
"git add -p" by users with diff.suppressBlankEmpty set to true
failed to parse the patch that represents an unmodified empty line
with an empty line (not a line with a single space on it), which
has been corrected.
* pw/add-patch-with-suppress-blank-empty:
add-patch: use normalize_marker() when recounting edited hunk
add-patch: handle splitting hunks with diff.suppressBlankEmpty
|
|
Make the print command trigger the pager when invoked using a capital
'P', to make it easier for the user to review long hunks.
Note that if the PAGER ends unexpectedly before we've been able to send
the payload, perhaps because the user is not interested in the whole
thing, we might receive a SIGPIPE, which would abruptly and unexpectedly
terminate the interactive session for the user.
Therefore, we need to ignore a possible SIGPIPE signal. Add a test for
this, in addition to the test for normal operation.
For the SIGPIPE test, we need to make sure that we completely fill the
operating system's buffer, otherwise we might not trigger the SIGPIPE
signal. The normal size of this buffer in different OSs varies from a
few KBs to 1MB. Use a payload large enough to guarantee that we exceed
this limit.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a test for the 'p' command, which was introduced in 66c14ab592
(add-patch: introduce 'p' in interactive-patch, 2024-03-29).
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When "add -p" parses diffs, it looks for context lines starting with a
single space. But when diff.suppressBlankEmpty is in effect, an empty
context line will omit the space, giving us a true empty line. This
confuses the parser, which is unable to split based on such a line.
It's tempting to say that we should just make sure that we generate a
diff without that option. However, although we do not parse hunks that
the user has manually edited with parse_diff() we do allow the user
to split such hunks. As POSIX calls the decision of whether to print the
space here "implementation-defined" we need to handle edited hunks where
empty context lines omit the space.
So let's handle both cases: a context line either starts with a space or
consists of a totally empty line by normalizing the first character to a
space when we parse them. Normalizing the first character rather than
changing the code to check for a space or newline will hopefully future
proof against introducing similar bugs if the code is changed.
Reported-by: Ilya Tumaykin <itumaykin@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The configuration variable stopped doing anything (other than
announcing itself as a variable that does not do anything useful,
when it is used) in Git 2.40.
At this point, it is not even worth giving the warning, which was
meant to be a way to help users notice they are carrying unused
cruft in their configuration files and give them a chance to
clean-up.
Let's remove the warning and documentation for it, and truly stop
paying attention to it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
Documentation/config/add.txt | 6 ------
builtin/add.c | 6 +-----
t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 15 ---------------
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
|
|
In a "git add -p" session, especially when we are not using the
single-key mode, we may see 'qa' as a response to a prompt
(1/2) Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,j,J,g,/,e,p,?]?
and then just do the 'q' thing (i.e. quit the session), ignoring
everything other than the first byte.
If 'q' and 'a' are next to each other on the user's keyboard, there
is a plausible chance that we see 'qa' when the user who wanted to
say 'a' fat-fingered and we ended up doing the 'q' thing instead.
As we didn't think of a good reason during the review discussion why
we want to accept excess letters only to ignore them, it appears to
be a safe change to simply reject input that is longer than just one
byte.
The two exceptions are the 'g' command that takes a hunk number, and
the '/' command that takes a regular expression. They have to be
accompanied by their operands (this makes me wonder how users who
set the interactive.singlekey configuration feed these operands---it
turns out that we notice there is no operand and give them another
chance to type the operand separately, without using single key
input this time), so we accept a string that is more than one byte
long.
Keep the "use only the first byte, downcased" behaviour when we ask
yes/no question, though. Neither on Qwerty or on Dvorak, 'y' and
'n' are not close to each other.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When the user responds to a prompt given by "git add -p" with an
unsupported command, list of available commands were given, which
was too much if the user knew what they wanted to type but merely
made a typo. Now the user gets a much shorter error message.
* rj/add-p-typo-reaction:
add-patch: response to unknown command
add-patch: do not show UI messages on stderr
|
|
When the user gives an unknown command to the "add -p" prompt, the list
of accepted commands with their explanation is given. This is the same
output they get when they say '?'.
However, the unknown command may be due to a user input error rather
than the user not knowing the valid command.
To reduce the likelihood of user confusion and error repetition, instead
of displaying the list of accepted commands, display a short error
message with the unknown command received, as feedback to the user.
Include a reminder about the current command '?' in the new message, to
guide the user if they want help.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There is no need to show some UI messages on stderr, and yet doing so
may produce some undesirable results, such as messages appearing in an
unexpected order.
Let's use stdout for all UI messages, and adjusts the tests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Plug a leak we have since 5a76aff1a6 (add: convert to use
parse_pathspec, 2013-07-14).
This leak can be triggered with:
$ git add -p anything
Fixing this leak allows us to mark as leak-free the following tests:
+ t3701-add-interactive.sh
+ t7514-commit-patch.sh
Mark them with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to notice and fix
promply any new leak that may be introduced and triggered by them in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Shortly we're going make interactive-patch stop printing automatically
the hunk under certain circumstances.
Let's introduce a new option to allow the user to explicitly request
the printing.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the
only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to
test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are
callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to
other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep.
This patch was produced more or less with
git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' |
xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /'
and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the
above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate
test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree
contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit.
You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected,
in addition to the manual reproduction.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The reimplemented "git add -i" did not honor color.ui configuration.
* ds/add-i-color-configuration-fix:
add: test use of brackets when color is disabled
add: check color.ui for interactive add
|
|
From 02156b81bbb2cafb19d702c55d45714fcf224048 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 09:39:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] add: test use of brackets when color is disabled
The interactive add command, 'git add -i', displays a menu of options
using full words. When color is enabled, the first letter of each word
is changed to a highlight color to signal that the first letter could be
used as a command. Without color, brackets ("[]") are used around these
first letters.
This behavior was not previously tested directly in t3701, so add a test
for it now. Since we use 'git add -i >actual <input' without
'force_color', the color system recognizes that colors are not available
on stdout and will be disabled by default.
This test would reproduce correctly with or without the fix in the
previous commit to make sure that color.ui is respected in 'git add'.
Reported-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When 'git add -i' and 'git add -p' were converted to a builtin, they
introduced a color bug: the 'color.ui' config setting is ignored.
The included test demonstrates an example that is similar to the
previous test, which focuses on customizing colors. Here, we are
demonstrating that colors are not being used at all by comparing the raw
output and the color-decoded version of that output.
The fix is simple, to use git_color_default_config() as the fallback for
git_add_config(). A more robust change would instead encapsulate the
git_use_color_default global in methods that would check the config
setting if it has not been initialized yet. Some ideas are being
discussed on this front [1], but nothing has been finalized.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1539.git.1685716420.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
This test case naturally bisects down to 0527ccb1b55 (add -i: default to
the built-in implementation, 2021-11-30), but the fix makes it clear
that this would be broken even if we added the config to use the builtin
earlier than this.
Reported-by: Greg Alexander <gitgreg@galexander.org>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test fix.
* ab/retire-scripted-add-p:
t3701: we don't need no Perl for `add -i` anymore
|
|
This should have been removed in `ab/retire-scripted-add-p` but wasn't.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git add -p" while the index is unmerged sometimes failed to parse
the diff output it internally produces and died, which has been
corrected.
* jk/add-p-unmerged-fix:
add-patch: handle "* Unmerged path" lines
|
|
Test clean-up.
* ab/avoid-losing-exit-codes-in-tests:
tests: don't lose misc "git" exit codes
tests: don't lose exit status with "test <op> $(git ...)"
tests: don't lose "git" exit codes in "! ( git ... | grep )"
tests: don't lose exit status with "(cd ...; test <op> $(git ...))"
t/lib-patch-mode.sh: fix ignored exit codes
auto-crlf tests: don't lose exit code in loops and outside tests
|
|
When we generate a diff with --cached, unmerged entries have no oid for
their index entry:
$ git diff-index --abbrev --cached HEAD
:100644 000000 f719efd 0000000 U my-conflict
So when we are asked to produce a patch, since we only have one side, we
just emit a special message:
$ git diff-index --cached -p HEAD
* Unmerged path my-conflict
This confuses interactive-patch modes that look at cached diffs. For
example:
$ git reset -p
BUG: add-patch.c:498: diff starts with unexpected line:
* Unmerged path my-conflict
Making things even more confusing, you'll get that error only if the
unmerged entry is alphabetically the first changed file. Otherwise, we
simply stick the unrecognized line to the end of the previous hunk.
There it's mostly harmless, as it eventually gets fed back to "git
apply", which happily ignores it. But it's still shown to the user
attached to the hunk, which is wrong.
So let's handle these lines as a noop. There's not really anything
useful to do with a conflicted merge in this case, and that's what we do
for other cases like "add -p". There we get a "diff --cc" line, which we
accept as starting a new file, but we refuse to use any of its hunks
(their headers start with "@@@" and not "@@ ", so we silently ignore
them).
It seems like simply recognizing the line and continuing in our parsing
loop would work. But we actually need to run the rest of the loop body
to handle matching up our colored/filtered output. But that code assumes
that we have some active file_diff we're working on. So instead, we'll
just insert a dummy entry into our array. This ends up the same as if we
saw a "diff --cc" line (a file with no hunks).
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Fix a few miscellaneous cases where:
- We lost the "git" exit code via "git ... | grep"
- Likewise by having a $(git) argument to git itself
- Used "test -z" to check that a command emitted no output, we can use
"test_must_be_empty" and &&-chaining instead.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since [1] first released with Git v2.37.0 the built-in version of "add
-i" has been the default. That built-in implementation was added in
[2], first released with Git v2.25.0.
At this point enough time has passed to allow for finding any
remaining bugs in this new implementation, so let's remove the
fallback code.
As with similar migrations for "stash"[3] and "rebase"[4] we're
keeping a mention of "add.interactive.useBuiltin" in the
documentation, but adding a warning() to notify any outstanding users
that the built-in is now the default. As with [5] and [6] we should
follow-up in the future and eventually remove that warning.
1. 0527ccb1b55 (add -i: default to the built-in implementation,
2021-11-30)
2. f83dff60a78 (Start to implement a built-in version of `git add
--interactive`, 2019-11-13)
3. 8a2cd3f5123 (stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin setting,
2020-03-03)
4. d03ebd411c6 (rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting,
2019-03-18)
5. deeaf5ee077 (stash: remove documentation for `stash.useBuiltin`,
2022-01-27)
6. 9bcde4d5314 (rebase: remove transitory rebase.useBuiltin setting &
env, 2021-03-23)
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
More fixes to "add -p"
* js/builtin-add-p-portability-fix:
t6132(NO_PERL): do not run the scripted `add -p`
t3701: test the built-in `add -i` regardless of NO_PERL
add -p: avoid ambiguous signed/unsigned comparison
|
|
Those who use diff-so-fancy as the diff-filter noticed a regression
or two in the code that parses the diff output in the built-in
version of "add -p", which has been corrected.
* js/add-p-diff-parsing-fix:
add -p: ignore dirty submodules
add -p: gracefully handle unparseable hunk headers in colored diffs
add -p: detect more mismatches between plain vs colored diffs
|
|
Thanks to always running `diff-index` and `diff-files` with the
`--numstat` option (the latter with `--ignore-submodules=dirty`) before
even generating any real diff to parse, the Perl version of `git add -p`
simply ignored dirty submodules and does not even offer them up for
staging.
However, the built-in variant did not use that flag because it tries to
run only one `diff` command, skipping the unneeded
`diff-index`/`diff-files` invocation of the Perl variant and therefore
only faithfully recapitulates what the Perl code does once it _does_
generate and parse the real diff.
This causes a problem when running the built-in `add -p` with
`diff-so-fancy` because that diff colorizer always inserts an empty line
before the diff header to ensure that it produces 4 lines as expected by
`git add -p` (the equivalent of the non-colorized `diff`, `index`, `---`
and `+++` lines). But `git diff-files` does not produce any `index` line
for dirty submodules.
The underlying problem is not even the discrepancy in lines, but that
`git add -p` presents diffs for dirty submodules: there is nothing that
_can_ be staged for those.
Let's fix that bug, and teach the built-in `add -p` to ignore dirty
submodules, too. This _incidentally_ also fixes the `diff-so-fancy`
problem ;-)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In
https://lore.kernel.org/git/ecf6f5be-22ca-299f-a8f1-bda38e5ca246@gmail.com,
Phillipe Blain reported that the built-in `git add -p` command fails
when asked to use [`diff-so-fancy`][diff-so-fancy] to colorize the diff.
The reason is that this tool produces colored diffs with a hunk header
that does not contain any parseable `@@ ... @@` line range information,
and therefore we cannot detect any part in that header that comes after
the line range.
As proposed by Phillip Wood, let's take that for a clear indicator that
we should show the hunk headers verbatim. This is what the Perl version
of the interactive `add` command did, too.
[diff-so-fancy]: https://github.com/so-fancy/diff-so-fancy
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When parsing the colored version of a diff, the interactive `add`
command really relies on the colored version having the same number of
lines as the plain (uncolored) version. That is an invariant.
We already have code to verify correctly when the colored diff has less
lines than the plain diff. Modulo an off-by-one bug: If the last diff
line has no matching colored one, the code pretends to succeed, still.
To make matters worse, when we adjusted the test in 1e4ffc765db (t3701:
adjust difffilter test, 2020-01-14), we did not catch this because `add
-p` fails for a _different_ reason: it does not find any colored hunk
header that contains a parseable line range.
If we change the test case so that the line range _can_ be parsed, the
bug is exposed.
Let's address all of the above by
- fixing the off-by-one,
- adjusting the test case to allow `add -p` to parse the line range
- making the test case more stringent by verifying that the expected
error message is shown
Also adjust a misleading code comment about the now-fixed code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The built-in `git add --interactive` does not require Perl, therefore we
can safely run these tests even when building with `NO_PERL=LetsDoThat`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
