aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3200-branch.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-03-11t3200: replace hardcoded null OID with $ZERO_OIDSiddharth Shrimali
To support the SHA-256 transition, replace the hardcoded 40-zero string in 'git branch --merged' with '$ZERO_OID'. The current 40-character string causes the test to fail prematurely in SHA-256 environments because Git identifies a "malformed object name" (due to the 40 vs 64 character mismatch) before it even validates the object type. By using '$ZERO_OID', we ensure the hash length is always correct for the active algorithm. Additionally, use 'test_grep' to verify the "must point to a commit" error message, ensuring the test validates the object type logic rather than just string syntax. Suggested-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Shrimali <r.siddharth.shrimali@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2025-12-03branch: advice using git-help(1) instead of man(1)Kristoffer Haugsbakk
8fbd903e (branch: advise about ref syntax rules, 2024-03-05) added an advice about checking git-check-ref-format(1) for the ref syntax rules. The advice uses man(1). But git(1) is a multi-platform tool and man(1) may not be available on some platforms. It might also be slightly jarring to see a suggestion for running a command which is not from the Git suite. Let’s instead use git-help(1) in order to stay inside the land of git(1). This also means that `help.format` (for `man`, `html` or other formats) will be used if set. Also change to using single quotes (') to quote the command since that is more conventional. While here let’s also update the test to use `{SQ}`, which is more readable and easier to edit. Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2025-02-05worktree: detect from secondary worktree if main worktree is bareOlga Pilipenco
When extensions.worktreeConfig is true and the main worktree is bare -- that is, its config.worktree file contains core.bare=true -- commands run from secondary worktrees incorrectly see the main worktree as not bare. As such, those commands incorrectly think that the repository's default branch (typically "main" or "master") is checked out in the bare repository even though it's not. This makes it impossible, for instance, to checkout or delete the default branch from a secondary worktree, among other shortcomings. This problem occurs because, when extensions.worktreeConfig is true, commands run in secondary worktrees only consult $commondir/config and $commondir/worktrees/<id>/config.worktree, thus they never see the main worktree's core.bare=true setting in $commondir/config.worktree. Fix this problem by consulting the main worktree's config.worktree file when checking whether it is bare. (This extra work is performed only when running from a secondary worktree.) Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Olga Pilipenco <olga.pilipenco@shopify.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-12-15Merge branch 'bf/explicit-config-set-in-advice-messages'Junio C Hamano
The advice messages now tell the newer 'git config set' command to set the advice.token configuration variable to squelch a message. * bf/explicit-config-set-in-advice-messages: advice: suggest using subcommand "git config set"
2024-12-06advice: suggest using subcommand "git config set"Bence Ferdinandy
The advice message currently suggests using "git config advice..." to disable advice messages, but since 00bbdde141 (builtin/config: introduce "set" subcommand, 2024-05-06) we have the "set" subcommand for config. Since using the subcommand is more in-line with the modern interface, any advice should be promoting its usage. Change the disable advice message to use the subcommand instead. Change all uses of "git config advice" in the tests to use the subcommand. Signed-off-by: Bence Ferdinandy <bence@ferdinandy.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-11-21t: remove TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK annotationsPatrick Steinhardt
Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-03-29advice: omit trailing whitespaceJunio C Hamano
Git tools all consistently encourage users to avoid whitespaces at the end of line by giving them features like "git diff --check" and "git am --whitespace=fix". Make sure that the advice messages we give users avoid trailing whitespaces. We shouldn't be wasting vertical screen real estate by adding blank lines in advice messages that are supposed to be concise hints, but as long as we write such blank line in our "hints", we should do it right. A test that expects the current behaviour of leaving trailing whitespaces has been adjusted. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-03-16t/t3*: avoid redundant uses of catBeat Bolli
Signed-off-by: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li> Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-03-15Merge branch 'kh/branch-ref-syntax-advice'Junio C Hamano
When git refuses to create a branch because the proposed branch name is not a valid refname, an advice message is given to refer the user to exact naming rules. * kh/branch-ref-syntax-advice: branch: advise about ref syntax rules advice: use double quotes for regular quoting advice: use backticks for verbatim advice: make all entries stylistically consistent t3200: improve test style
2024-03-05branch: advise about ref syntax rulesKristoffer Haugsbakk
git-branch(1) will error out if you give it a bad ref name. But the user might not understand why or what part of the name is illegal. The user might know that there are some limitations based on the *loose ref* format (filenames), but there are also further rules for easier integration with shell-based tools, pathname expansion, and playing well with reference name expressions. The man page for git-check-ref-format(1) contains these rules. Let’s advise about it since that is not a command that you just happen upon. Also make this advise configurable since you might not want to be reminded every time you make a little typo. Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-03-05t3200: improve test styleKristoffer Haugsbakk
Some tests use a preliminary heredoc for `expect` or have setup and teardown commands before and after, respectively. It is however preferred to keep all the logic in the test itself. Let’s move these into the tests. Also: • Remove a now-irrelevant comment about test placement and switch back to `main` post-test • Prefer indented literal heredocs (`-\EOF`) except for a block which says that this is intentional Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-02-15t: move tests exercising the "files" backendPatrick Steinhardt
We still have a bunch of tests scattered across our test suites that exercise on-disk files of the "files" backend directly: - t1301 exercises permissions of reflog files when the config "core.sharedRepository" is set. - t1400 exercises whether empty directories in the ref store are handled correctly. - t3200 exercises what happens when there are symlinks in the ref store. - t3400 also exercises what happens when ".git/logs" is a symlink. All of these are inherently low-level tests specific to the "files" backend. Move them into "t0600-reffiles-backend.sh" to reflect this. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-01-02t: introduce DEFAULT_REPO_FORMAT prereqPatrick Steinhardt
A limited number of tests require repositories to have the default repository format or otherwise they would fail to run, e.g. because they fail to detect the correct hash function. While the hash function is the only extension right now that creates problems like this, we are about to add a second extension for the ref format. Introduce a new DEFAULT_REPO_FORMAT prereq that can easily be amended whenever we add new format extensions. Next to making any such changes easier on us, the prerequisite's name should also help to clarify the intent better. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-12-09Merge branch 'vd/for-each-ref-unsorted-optimization'Junio C Hamano
"git for-each-ref --no-sort" still sorted the refs alphabetically which paid non-trivial cost. It has been redefined to show output in an unspecified order, to allow certain optimizations to take advantage of. * vd/for-each-ref-unsorted-optimization: t/perf: add perf tests for for-each-ref ref-filter.c: use peeled tag for '*' format fields for-each-ref: clean up documentation of --format ref-filter.c: filter & format refs in the same callback ref-filter.c: refactor to create common helper functions ref-filter.c: rename 'ref_filter_handler()' to 'filter_one()' ref-filter.h: add functions for filter/format & format-only ref-filter.h: move contains caches into filter ref-filter.h: add max_count and omit_empty to ref_format ref-filter.c: really don't sort when using --no-sort
2023-12-09Merge branch 'ps/ref-tests-update'Junio C Hamano
Update ref-related tests. * ps/ref-tests-update: t: mark several tests that assume the files backend with REFFILES t7900: assert the absence of refs via git-for-each-ref(1) t7300: assert exact states of repo t4207: delete replace references via git-update-ref(1) t1450: convert tests to remove worktrees via git-worktree(1) t: convert tests to not access reflog via the filesystem t: convert tests to not access symrefs via the filesystem t: convert tests to not write references via the filesystem t: allow skipping expected object ID in `ref-store update-ref`
2023-11-16ref-filter.c: really don't sort when using --no-sortVictoria Dye
When '--no-sort' is passed to 'for-each-ref', 'tag', and 'branch', the printed refs are still sorted by ascending refname. Change the handling of sort options in these commands so that '--no-sort' to truly disables sorting. '--no-sort' does not disable sorting in these commands is because their option parsing does not distinguish between "the absence of '--sort'" (and/or values for tag.sort & branch.sort) and '--no-sort'. Both result in an empty 'sorting_options' string list, which is parsed by 'ref_sorting_options()' to create the 'struct ref_sorting *' for the command. If the string list is empty, 'ref_sorting_options()' interprets that as "the absence of '--sort'" and returns the default ref sorting structure (equivalent to "refname" sort). To handle '--no-sort' properly while preserving the "refname" sort in the "absence of --sort'" case, first explicitly add "refname" to the string list *before* parsing options. This alone doesn't actually change any behavior, since 'compare_refs()' already falls back on comparing refnames if two refs are equal w.r.t all other sort keys. Now that the string list is populated by default, '--no-sort' is the only way to empty the 'sorting_options' string list. Update 'ref_sorting_options()' to return a NULL 'struct ref_sorting *' if the string list is empty, and add a condition to 'ref_array_sort()' to skip the sort altogether if the sort structure is NULL. Note that other functions using 'struct ref_sorting *' do not need any changes because they already ignore NULL values. Finally, remove the condition around sorting in 'ls-remote', since it's no longer necessary. Unlike 'for-each-ref' et. al., it does *not* do any sorting by default. This default is preserved by simply leaving its sort key string list empty before parsing options; if no additional sort keys are set, 'struct ref_sorting *' is NULL and sorting is skipped. Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-08Merge branch 'jc/test-i18ngrep'Junio C Hamano
Another step to deprecate test_i18ngrep. * jc/test-i18ngrep: tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grep test framework: further deprecate test_i18ngrep
2023-11-08Merge branch 'ps/show-ref'Junio C Hamano
Teach "git show-ref" a mode to check the existence of a ref. * ps/show-ref: t: use git-show-ref(1) to check for ref existence builtin/show-ref: add new mode to check for reference existence builtin/show-ref: explicitly spell out different modes in synopsis builtin/show-ref: ensure mutual exclusiveness of subcommands builtin/show-ref: refactor options for patterns subcommand builtin/show-ref: stop using global vars for `show_one()` builtin/show-ref: stop using global variable to count matches builtin/show-ref: refactor `--exclude-existing` options builtin/show-ref: fix dead code when passing patterns builtin/show-ref: fix leaking string buffer builtin/show-ref: split up different subcommands builtin/show-ref: convert pattern to a local variable
2023-11-03t: mark several tests that assume the files backend with REFFILESPatrick Steinhardt
Add the REFFILES prerequisite to several tests that assume we're using the files backend. There are various reasons why we cannot easily convert those tests to be backend-independent, where the most common one is that we have no way to write corrupt references into the refdb via our tooling. We may at a later point in time grow the tooling to make this possible, but for now we just mark these tests as requiring the files backend. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-03t: convert tests to not access reflog via the filesystemPatrick Steinhardt
Some of our tests reach directly into the filesystem in order to both read or modify the reflog, which will break once we have a second reference backend in our codebase that stores reflogs differently. Refactor these tests to either use git-reflog(1) or the ref-store test helper. Note that the refactoring to use git-reflog(1) also requires us to adapt our expectations in some cases where we previously verified the exact on-disk log entries. This seems like an acceptable tradeoff though to ensure that different backends have the same user-visible behaviour as any user would typically use git-reflog(1) anyway to access the logs. Any backend-specific verification of the written on-disk format should be implemented in a separate, backend-specific test. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-03t: convert tests to not access symrefs via the filesystemPatrick Steinhardt
Some of our tests access symbolic references via the filesystem directly. While this works with the current files reference backend, it this will break once we have a second reference backend in our codebase. Refactor these tests to instead use git-symbolic-ref(1) or our `ref-store` test tool. The latter is required in some cases where safety checks of git-symbolic-ref(1) would otherwise reject writing a symbolic reference. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-03Merge branch 'ps/show-ref' into ps/ref-tests-updateJunio C Hamano
* ps/show-ref: t: use git-show-ref(1) to check for ref existence builtin/show-ref: add new mode to check for reference existence builtin/show-ref: explicitly spell out different modes in synopsis builtin/show-ref: ensure mutual exclusiveness of subcommands builtin/show-ref: refactor options for patterns subcommand builtin/show-ref: stop using global vars for `show_one()` builtin/show-ref: stop using global variable to count matches builtin/show-ref: refactor `--exclude-existing` options builtin/show-ref: fix dead code when passing patterns builtin/show-ref: fix leaking string buffer builtin/show-ref: split up different subcommands builtin/show-ref: convert pattern to a local variable
2023-11-02tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grepJunio C Hamano
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep. This patch was produced more or less with git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' | xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /' and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit. You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected, in addition to the manual reproduction. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-11-01t: use git-show-ref(1) to check for ref existencePatrick Steinhardt
Convert tests that use `test_path_is_file` and `test_path_is_missing` to instead use a set of helpers `test_ref_exists` and `test_ref_missing`. These helpers are implemented via the newly introduced `git show-ref --exists` command. Thus, we can avoid intimate knowledge of how the ref backend stores references on disk. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-10-23builtin/branch.c: adjust error messages to coding guidelinesIsoken June Ibizugbe
As per the CodingGuidelines document, it is recommended that error messages such as die(), error() and warning(), should start with a lowercase letter and should not end with a period. This patch adjusts tests to match updated messages. Signed-off-by: Isoken June Ibizugbe <isokenjune@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-08-07branch: error message deleting a branch in useRubén Justo
Let's update the error message we show when the user tries to delete a branch which is being used in another worktree, following the guideline reasoned in 4970bedef2 (branch: update the message to refuse touching a branch in-use, 2023-07-21). Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-06-17tests: mark as passing with SANITIZE=leakRubén Justo
The tests listed below, since previous commits, no longer trigger any leak. + t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh + t1508-at-combinations.sh + t1514-rev-parse-push.sh + t2027-checkout-track.sh + t3200-branch.sh + t3204-branch-name-interpretation.sh + t5404-tracking-branches.sh + t5517-push-mirror.sh + t5525-fetch-tagopt.sh + t6040-tracking-info.sh + t7508-status.sh Let's mark them with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to notice and fix promptly any new leak that may be introduced and triggered by them in the future. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-05-15Merge branch 'rj/branch-unborn-in-other-worktrees'Junio C Hamano
Error messages given when working on an unborn branch that is checked out in another worktree have been improved. * rj/branch-unborn-in-other-worktrees: branch: avoid unnecessary worktrees traversals branch: rename orphan branches in any worktree branch: description for orphan branch errors branch: use get_worktrees() in copy_or_rename_branch() branch: test for failures while renaming branches
2023-03-27branch: rename orphan branches in any worktreeRubén Justo
In cfaff3aac (branch -m: allow renaming a yet-unborn branch, 2020-12-13) we added support for renaming an orphan branch when that branch is checked out in the current worktree. Let's also allow renaming an orphan branch checked out in a worktree different than the current one. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-03-27branch: test for failures while renaming branchesRubén Justo
When we introduced replace_each_worktree_head_symref() in 70999e9cec (branch -m: update all per-worktree HEADs, 2016-03-27), we implemented a best effort approach. If we are asked to rename a branch that is simultaneously checked out in multiple worktrees, we try to update all of those worktrees. If we fail updating any of them, we die() as a signal that something has gone wrong. However, at this point, the branch ref has already been renamed and also updated the HEADs of the successfully updated worktrees. Despite returning an error, we do not try to rollback those changes. Let's add a test to notice if we change this behavior in the future. In next commits we will change replace_each_worktree_head_symref() to work more closely with its only caller, copy_or_rename_branch(). Let's move the former closer to its caller, to facilitate those changes. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-06tests: don't lose exit status with "(cd ...; test <op> $(git ...))"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Rewrite tests that ran "git" inside command substitution and lost the exit status of "git" so that we notice the failing "git". Have them use modern patterns such as a "test_cmp" of the expected outputs instead. We'll fix more of these these in the subsequent commit, for now we're only converting the cases where this loss of exit code was combined with spawning a sub-shell. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-11-10branch: gracefully handle '-d' on orphan HEADJeff King
When deleting a branch, "git branch -d" has a safety check that ensures the branch is merged to its upstream (if any), or to HEAD. To do that, naturally we try to resolve HEAD to a commit object. If we're on an orphan branch (i.e., HEAD points to a branch that does not yet exist), that will fail, and we'll bail with an error: $ git branch -d to-delete fatal: Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD This usually isn't that big of a deal. The deletion would fail anyway, since the branch isn't merged to HEAD, and you'd need to use "-D" (or "-f"). And doing so skips the HEAD resolution, courtesy of 67affd5173 (git-branch -D: make it work even when on a yet-to-be-born branch, 2006-11-24). But there are still two problems: 1. The error message isn't very helpful. We should give the usual "not fully merged" message, which points the user at "branch -D". That was a problem even back in 67affd5173. 2. Even without a HEAD, these days it's still possible for the deletion to succeed. After 67affd5173, commit 99c419c915 (branch -d: base the "already-merged" safety on the branch it merges with, 2009-12-29) made it OK to delete a branch if it is merged to its upstream. We can fix both by removing the die() in delete_branches() completely, leaving head_rev NULL in this case. It's tempting to stop there, as it appears at first glance that the rest of the code does the right thing with a NULL. But sadly, it's not quite true. We end up feeding the NULL to repo_is_descendant_of(). In the traditional code path there, we call repo_in_merge_bases_many(). It feeds the NULL to repo_parse_commit(), which is smart enough to return an error, and we immediately return "no, it's not a descendant". But there's an alternate code path: if we have a commit graph with generation numbers, we end up in can_all_from_reach(), which does eventually try to set a flag on the NULL commit and segfaults. So instead, we'll teach the local branch_merged() helper to treat a NULL as "not merged". This would be a little more elegant in in_merge_bases() itself, but that function is called in a lot of places, and it's not clear that quietly returning "not merged" is the right thing everywhere (I'd expect in many cases, feeding a NULL is a sign of a bug). There are four tests here: a. The first one confirms that deletion succeeds with an orphaned HEAD when the branch is merged to its upstream. This is case (2) above. b. Same, but with commit graphs enabled. Even if it is merged to upstream, we still check head_rev so that we can say "deleting because it's merged to upstream, even though it's not merged to HEAD". Without the second hunk in branch_merged(), this test would segfault in can_all_from_reach(). c. The third one confirms that we correctly say "not merged to HEAD" when we can't resolve HEAD, and reject the deletion. d. Same, but with commit graphs enabled. Without the first hunk in branch_merged(), this one would segfault. Reported-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-10-30Merge branch 'rj/branch-do-not-exit-with-minus-one-status'Taylor Blau
"git branch --edit-description" can exit with status -1 which is not a good practice; it learned to use 1 as everybody else instead. * rj/branch-do-not-exit-with-minus-one-status: branch: error code with --edit-description
2022-10-26branch: error code with --edit-descriptionRubén Justo
Since c2d17ba3db0d (branch --edit-description: protect against mistyped branch name, 2012-02-05) we return -1 on error editing the branch description. Let's change to 1, which follows the established convention and it is better for portability reasons. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-26branch: error copying or renaming a detached HEADRubén Justo
In c847f53712 (Detached HEAD (experimental), 2007-01-01) an error condition was introduced in rename_branch() to prevent renaming, later also copying, a detached HEAD. The condition used was checking for NULL in oldname, the source branch to rename/copy. That condition cannot be satisfied because if no source branch is specified, HEAD is going to be used in the call. The error issued instead is: fatal: Invalid branch name: 'HEAD' Let's remove the condition in copy_or_rename_branch() (the current function name) and check for HEAD before calling it, dying with the original intended error if we're in a detached HEAD. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-17Sync with v2.38.1Junio C Hamano
2022-10-17Merge branch 'jc/branch-description-unset'Junio C Hamano
"GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description" resulted in failure, which has been corrected. * jc/branch-description-unset: branch: do not fail a no-op --edit-desc
2022-10-06Sync with 2.36.3Taylor Blau
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-10-06Sync with 2.35.5Taylor Blau
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-10-06Sync with 2.34.5Taylor Blau
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-10-06Sync with 2.32.4Taylor Blau
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-10-06Sync with 2.30.6Taylor Blau
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-10-01t/t3NNN: allow local submodulesTaylor Blau
To prepare for the default value of `protocol.file.allow` to change to "user", ensure tests that rely on local submodules can initialize them over the file protocol. Tests that only need to interact with submodules in a limited capacity have individual Git commands annotated with the appropriate configuration via `-c`. Tests that interact with submodules a handful of times use `test_config_global` instead. Test scripts that rely on submodules throughout use a `git config --global` during a setup test towards the beginning of the script. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-09-30branch: do not fail a no-op --edit-descJunio C Hamano
Imagine running "git branch --edit-description" while on a branch without the branch description, and then exit the editor after emptying the edit buffer, which is the way to tell the command that you changed your mind and you do not want the description after all. The command should just happily oblige, adding no branch description for the current branch, and exit successfully. But it fails to do so: $ git init -b main $ git commit --allow-empty -m commit $ GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description fatal: could not unset 'branch.main.description' The end result is OK in that the configuration variable does not exist in the resulting repository, but we should do better. If we know we didn't have a description, and if we are asked not to have a description by the editor, we can just return doing nothing. This of course introduces TOCTOU. If you add a branch description to the same branch from another window, while you had the editor open to edit the description, and then exit the editor without writing anything there, we'd end up not removing the description you added in the other window. But you are fooling yourself in your own repository at that point, and if it hurts, you'd be better off not doing so ;-). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-09-21t: remove \{m,n\} from BRE grep usageĐoàn Trần Công Danh
The CodingGuidelines says we should avoid \{m,n\} in BRE usage. And their usages in our code base is limited, and subjectively hard to read. Replace them with ERE. Except for "0\{40\}" which would be changed to "$ZERO_OID", which is a better value for testing with: GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256 Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-04-29branch: new autosetupmerge option 'simple' for matching branchesTao Klerks
With the default push.default option, "simple", beginners are protected from accidentally pushing to the "wrong" branch in centralized workflows: if the remote tracking branch they would push to does not have the same name as the local branch, and they try to do a "default push", they get an error and explanation with options. There is a particular centralized workflow where this often happens: a user branches to a new local topic branch from an existing remote branch, eg with "checkout -b feature1 origin/master". With the default branch.autosetupmerge configuration (value "true"), git will automatically add origin/master as the upstream tracking branch. When the user pushes with a default "git push", with the intention of pushing their (new) topic branch to the remote, they get an error, and (amongst other things) a suggestion to run "git push origin HEAD". If they follow this suggestion the push succeeds, but on subsequent default pushes they continue to get an error - so eventually they figure out to add "-u" to change the tracking branch, or they spelunk the push.default config doc as proposed and set it to "current", or some GUI tooling does one or the other of these things for them. When one of their coworkers later works on the same topic branch, they don't get any of that "weirdness". They just "git checkout feature1" and everything works exactly as they expect, with the shared remote branch set up as remote tracking branch, and push and pull working out of the box. The "stable state" for this way of working is that local branches have the same-name remote tracking branch (origin/feature1 in this example), and multiple people can work on that remote feature branch at the same time, trusting "git pull" to merge or rebase as required for them to be able to push their interim changes to that same feature branch on that same remote. (merging from the upstream "master" branch, and merging back to it, are separate more involved processes in this flow). There is a problem in this flow/way of working, however, which is that the first user, when they first branched from origin/master, ended up with the "wrong" remote tracking branch (different from the stable state). For a while, before they pushed (and maybe longer, if they don't use -u/--set-upstream), their "git pull" wasn't getting other users' changes to the feature branch - it was getting any changes from the remote "master" branch instead (a completely different class of changes!) An experienced git user might say "well yeah, that's what it means to have the remote tracking branch set to origin/master!" - but the original user above didn't *ask* to have the remote master branch added as remote tracking branch - that just happened automatically when they branched their feature branch. They didn't necessarily even notice or understand the meaning of the "set up to track 'origin/master'" message when they created the branch - especially if they are using a GUI. Looking at how to fix this, you might think "OK, so disable auto setup of remote tracking - set branch.autosetupmerge to false" - but that will inconvenience the *second* user in this story - the one who just wanted to start working on the topic branch. The first and second users swap roles at different points in time of course - they should both have a sane configuration that does the right thing in both situations. Make this "branches have the same name locally as on the remote" workflow less painful / more obvious by introducing a new branch.autosetupmerge option called "simple", to match the same-name "push.default" option that makes similar assumptions. This new option automatically sets up tracking in a *subset* of the current default situations: when the original ref is a remote tracking branch *and* has the same branch name on the remote (as the new local branch name). Update the error displayed when the 'push.default=simple' configuration rejects a mismatching-upstream-name default push, to offer this new branch.autosetupmerge option that will prevent this class of error. With this new configuration, in the example situation above, the first user does *not* get origin/master set up as the tracking branch for the new local branch. If they "git pull" in their new local-only branch, they get an error explaining there is no upstream branch - which makes sense and is helpful. If they "git push", they get an error explaining how to push *and* suggesting they specify --set-upstream - which is exactly the right thing to do for them. This new option is likely not appropriate for users intentionally implementing a "triangular workflow" with a shared upstream tracking branch, that they "git pull" in and a "private" feature branch that they push/force-push to just for remote safe-keeping until they are ready to push up to the shared branch explicitly/separately. Such users are likely to prefer keeping the current default merge.autosetupmerge=true behavior, and change their push.default to "current". Also extend the existing branch tests with three new cases testing this option - the obvious matching-name and non-matching-name cases, and also a non-matching-ref-type case. The matching-name case needs to temporarily create an independent repo to fetch from, as the general strategy of using the local repo as the remote in these tests precludes locally branching with the same name as in the "remote". Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-04-01tracking branches: add advice to ambiguous refspec errorTao Klerks
The error "not tracking: ambiguous information for ref" is raised when we are evaluating what tracking information to set on a branch, and find that the ref to be added as tracking branch is mapped under multiple remotes' fetch refspecs. This can easily happen when a user copy-pastes a remote definition in their git config, and forgets to change the tracking path. Add advice in this situation, explicitly highlighting which remotes are involved and suggesting how to correct the situation. Also update a test to explicitly expect that advice. Signed-off-by: Tao Klerks <tao@klerks.biz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-18Merge branch 'gc/branch-recurse-submodules'Junio C Hamano
"git branch" learned the "--recurse-submodules" option. * gc/branch-recurse-submodules: branch.c: use 'goto cleanup' in setup_tracking() to fix memory leaks branch: add --recurse-submodules option for branch creation builtin/branch: consolidate action-picking logic in cmd_branch() branch: add a dry_run parameter to create_branch() branch: make create_branch() always create a branch branch: move --set-upstream-to behavior to dwim_and_setup_tracking()
2022-02-01branch: make create_branch() always create a branchGlen Choo
With the previous commit, there are no more invocations of create_branch() that do not create a branch because: * BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE is no longer passed * clobber_head_ok = true and force = false is never passed Assert these situations, delete dead code and ensure that we're handling clobber_head_ok and force correctly by introducing tests for `git branch --force`. As a result, create_branch() now always creates a branch. Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-01-31Merge branch 'js/branch-track-inherit' into gc/branch-recurse-submodulesJunio C Hamano
* js/branch-track-inherit: branch,checkout: fix --track documentation branch,checkout: fix --track usage strings config: require lowercase for branch.*.autosetupmerge branch: add flags and config to inherit tracking branch: accept multiple upstream branches for tracking