| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
git-cherry(1) links to this command. These two commands are similar and
we also mention it in the “Examples” section now. Let’s link to it.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The utility and usability of git-patch-id(1) was discussed
relatively recently:[1]
Using "git patch-id" is definitely in the "write a script for it"
category. I don't think I've ever used it as-is from the command
line as part of a one-liner. It's very much a command that is
designed purely for scripting, the interface is just odd and baroque
and doesn't really make sense for one-liners.
The typical use of patch-id is to generate two *lists* of patch-ids,
then sort them and use the patch-id as a key to find commits that
look the same.
The command doc *could* use an example, and since it is a mapper command
it makes sense for that example to be a little script.
Mapping the commits of some branch to an upstream ref allows us to
demonstrate generating two lists, sorting them, joining them, and
finally discarding the patch ID lookup column with cut(1).
† 1: https://lore.kernel.org/workflows/CAHk-=wiN+8EUoik4UeAJ-HPSU7hczQP+8+_uP3vtAy_=YfJ9PQ@mail.gmail.com/
Inspired-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Emphasize that you can pass multiple patches or diffs to this command.
git-patch-id(1) is an efficient pID–commit mapper, able to map
thousands of commits in seconds. But discussions on the command
seem to typically[1] use the standard loop-over-rev-list-and-
shell-out pattern:
for commit in rev-list:
prepare a diff from commit | git patch-id
This is unnecessary; we can bulk-process the patches:
git rev-list --no-merges <ref> |
git diff-tree --patch --stdin |
git patch-id --stable
The first version (translated to shell) takes a little over nine
minutes for a commit history of about 78K commits.[2] The other one,
by contrast, takes slightly less than a minute.
Also drop “the” from “standard input”.
† 1: https://stackoverflow.com/a/19758159
† 2: This is `master` of this repository on 2025-10-02
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The default `--unstable` is a legacy format that predates `--stable`.
That’s why 2871f4d4 (builtin: patch-id: add --verbatim as a command mode,
2022-10-24) made `--verbatim` lock in[1] `--stable`:
Users of --unstable mainly care about compatibility with old git
versions, which unstripping the whitespace would break. Thus there
isn't a usecase for the combination of --verbatim and --unstable,
and we don't expose this so as to not add maintainence burden.
† 1: imply `--stable`, disallow `--unstable`
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
You specifically need `--patch` since the default output is a raw diff.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The “Description” section decided to introduce and use the term “patch
ID” for the ID value itself. Let’s use the same term on the options as
well.
Also make to sure to use bare “ID” instead of “id”.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Git versions are always capitalized.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
These bullet points are full-fledged paragraphs with sentences. It’s
best to restrict semicolon-termination to the case when the bullet list
amounts to a list of items.[1]
† 1: Like “List: ... • first; ... • second; and ... • third.”
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Convert this command documentation to the modern synopsis style based on
similar work.[1] Concretely:
• Change the Synopsis section from `verse` to a `synopsis` block which
will automatically apply the correct formatting to various elements
(although this Synopsis is very simple)
• Use backticks (`) for code-like things which will also use the correct
formatting for interior placeholders (`<orderfile>`)
• Use inline-verbatim on options listing
† 1: E.g.,
• 026f2e3b (doc: convert git-log to new documentation format,
2025-07-07)
• b983aaab (doc: convert git-switch manpage to new synopsis style,
2025-05-25)
• 16543967 (doc: convert git-mergetool manpage to new synopsis
style, 2025-05-25)
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
All the final paragraphs on these three options are rendered as
literal blocks. The intent was surely to keep each of them wed to their
respective description list items. But the attempt at maintaining the
indentation level of the block causes each them to be interpreted as a
code block, since code blocks can be represented using indentation.
We need to use list continuation (+) in order to keep them wed to
their blocks.
There is also an unordered list which sandwiches two paragraphs on an
option. We don’t need to do anything about that since it attaches to the
description list item without list continuation (i.e. it is already
correct). But for consistency let’s use list continuation and an open
block on it.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not
wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc,
meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that
could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting.
It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files,
since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows
various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that
here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where
relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new
extension as well.
Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
