| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
A previous commit allowed a server to pass additional fields through
the "promisor-remote" protocol capability after the "name" and "url"
fields, specifically the "partialCloneFilter" and "token" fields.
Another previous commit, c213820c51 (promisor-remote: allow a client
to check fields, 2025-09-08), has made it possible for a client to
decide if it accepts a promisor remote advertised by a server based
on these additional fields.
Often though, it would be interesting for the client to just store in
its configuration files these additional fields passed by the server,
so that it can use them when needed.
For example if a token is necessary to access a promisor remote, that
token could be updated frequently only on the server side and then
passed to all the clients through the "promisor-remote" capability,
avoiding the need to update it on all the clients manually.
Storing the token on the client side makes sure that the token is
available when the client needs to access the promisor remotes for a
lazy fetch.
To allow this, let's introduce a new "promisor.storeFields"
configuration variable.
Note that for a partial clone filter, it's less interesting to have
it stored on the client. This is because a filter should be used
right away and we already pass a `--filter=<filter-spec>` option to
`git clone` when starting a partial clone. Storing the filter could
perhaps still be interesting for information purposes.
Like "promisor.checkFields" and "promisor.sendFields", the new
configuration variable should contain a comma or space separated list
of field names. Only the "partialCloneFilter" and "token" field names
are supported for now.
When a server advertises a promisor remote, for example "foo", along
with for example "token=XXXXX" to a client, and on the client side
"promisor.storeFields" contains "token", then the client will store
XXXXX for the "remote.foo.token" variable in its configuration file
and reload its configuration so it can immediately use this new
configuration variable.
A message is emitted on stderr to warn users when the config is
changed.
Note that even if "promisor.acceptFromServer" is set to "all", a
promisor remote has to be already configured on the client side for
some of its config to be changed. In any case no new remote is
configured and no new URL is stored.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A previous commit allowed a server to pass additional fields through
the "promisor-remote" protocol capability after the "name" and "url"
fields, specifically the "partialCloneFilter" and "token" fields.
Let's make it possible for a client to check if these fields match
what it expects before accepting a promisor remote.
We allow this by introducing a new "promisor.checkFields"
configuration variable. It should contain a comma or space separated
list of fields that will be checked.
By limiting the protocol to specific well-defined fields, we ensure
both server and client have a shared understanding of field
semantics and usage.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
For now the "promisor-remote" protocol capability can only pass "name"
and "url" information from a server to a client in the form
"name=<remote_name>,url=<remote_url>".
To allow clients to make more informed decisions about which promisor
remotes they accept, let's make it possible to pass more information
by introducing a new "promisor.sendFields" configuration variable.
On the server side, information about a remote `foo` is stored in
configuration variables named `remote.foo.<variable-name>`. To make
it clearer and simpler, we use `field` and `field name` like this:
* `field name` refers to the <variable-name> part of such a
configuration variable, and
* `field` refers to both the `field name` and the value of such a
configuration variable.
The "promisor.sendFields" configuration variable should contain a
comma or space separated list of field names that will be looked up
in the configuration of the remote on the server to find the values
that will be passed to the client.
Only a set of predefined field names are allowed. The only field
names in this set are "partialCloneFilter" and "token". The
"partialCloneFilter" field name specifies the filter definition used
by the promisor remote, and the "token" field name can provide an
authentication credential for accessing it.
For example, if "promisor.sendFields" is set to "partialCloneFilter",
and the server has the "remote.foo.partialCloneFilter" config
variable set to a value, then that value will be passed in the
"partialCloneFilter" field in the form "partialCloneFilter=<value>"
after the "name" and "url" fields.
A following commit will allow the client to use the information to
decide if it accepts the remote or not. For now the client doesn't do
anything with the additional information it receives.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Because the "[remote "nick"] fetch = ..." configuration variables
have the nickname in the second part, the nicknames are case
sensitive, unlike the first and the third component (i.e.
"remote.origin.fetch" and "Remote.origin.FETCH" are the same thing,
but "remote.Origin.fetch" and "remote.origin.fetch" are different).
Let's follow the way Git works in general and compare the remote
names case sensitively when processing advertised remotes.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A previous commit introduced a "promisor.acceptFromServer" configuration
variable with only "None" or "All" as valid values.
Let's introduce "KnownName" and "KnownUrl" as valid values for this
configuration option to give more choice to a client about which
promisor remotes it might accept among those that the server advertised.
In case of "KnownName", the client will accept promisor remotes which
are already configured on the client and have the same name as those
advertised by the client. This could be useful in a corporate setup
where servers and clients are trusted to not switch names and URLs, but
where some kind of control is still useful.
In case of "KnownUrl", the client will accept promisor remotes which
have both the same name and the same URL configured on the client as the
name and URL advertised by the server. This is the most secure option,
so it should be used if possible.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a server S knows that some objects from a repository are available
from a promisor remote X, S might want to suggest to a client C cloning
or fetching the repo from S that C may use X directly instead of S for
these objects.
Note that this could happen both in the case S itself doesn't have the
objects and borrows them from X, and in the case S has the objects but
knows that X is better connected to the world (e.g., it is in a
$LARGEINTERNETCOMPANY datacenter with petabit/s backbone connections)
than S. Implementation of the latter case, which would require S to
omit in its response the objects available on X, is left for future
improvement though.
Then C might or might not, want to get the objects from X. If S and C
can agree on C using X directly, S can then omit objects that can be
obtained from X when answering C's request.
To allow S and C to agree and let each other know about C using X or
not, let's introduce a new "promisor-remote" capability in the
protocol v2, as well as a few new configuration variables:
- "promisor.advertise" on the server side, and:
- "promisor.acceptFromServer" on the client side.
By default, or if "promisor.advertise" is set to 'false', a server S will
not advertise the "promisor-remote" capability.
If S doesn't advertise the "promisor-remote" capability, then a client C
replying to S shouldn't advertise the "promisor-remote" capability
either.
If "promisor.advertise" is set to 'true', S will advertise its promisor
remotes with a string like:
promisor-remote=<pr-info>[;<pr-info>]...
where each <pr-info> element contains information about a single
promisor remote in the form:
name=<pr-name>[,url=<pr-url>]
where <pr-name> is the urlencoded name of a promisor remote and
<pr-url> is the urlencoded URL of the promisor remote named <pr-name>.
For now, the URL is passed in addition to the name. In the future, it
might be possible to pass other information like a filter-spec that the
client may use when cloning from S, or a token that the client may use
when retrieving objects from X.
It is C's responsibility to arrange how it can reach X though, so pieces
of information that are usually outside Git's concern, like proxy
configuration, must not be distributed over this protocol.
It might also be possible in the future for "promisor.advertise" to have
other values. For example a value like "onlyName" could prevent S from
advertising URLs, which could help in case C should use a different URL
for X than the URL S is using. (The URL S is using might be an internal
one on the server side for example.)
By default or if "promisor.acceptFromServer" is set to "None", C will
not accept to use the promisor remotes that might have been advertised
by S. In this case, C will not advertise any "promisor-remote"
capability in its reply to S.
If "promisor.acceptFromServer" is set to "All" and S advertised some
promisor remotes, then on the contrary, C will accept to use all the
promisor remotes that S advertised and C will reply with a string like:
promisor-remote=<pr-name>[;<pr-name>]...
where the <pr-name> elements are the urlencoded names of all the
promisor remotes S advertised.
In a following commit, other values for "promisor.acceptFromServer" will
be implemented, so that C will be able to decide the promisor remotes it
accepts depending on the name and URL it received from S. So even if
that name and URL information is not used much right now, it will be
needed soon.
Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not
wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc,
meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that
could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting.
It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files,
since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows
various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that
here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where
relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new
extension as well.
Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
