| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Previously, there are three output of message printed by test or
benchmark: PASS, SKIP, or FAIL. All of them use the same prefix "---".
In case we have a module that run many many tests, it's become hard to
differentiate between PASS, SKIP, and FAIL.
This changes differentiate the SKIP and FAIL using different prefix.
For SKIP we prefix it with "???", for FAIL we prefix it with "!!!".
|
|
|
|
On Windows, the netpoll is currently coupled with the websocket usage
in the internal/poll package.
This CL moves the websocket handling out of the runtime and puts it into
the internal/poll package, which already contains most of the async I/O
logic for websockets.
This is a good refactor per se, as the Go runtime shouldn't know about
websockets. In addition, it will make it easier (in a future CL) to only
load ws2_32.dll when the Go program actually uses websockets.
Change-Id: Ic820872cf9bdbbf092505ed7f7504edb6687735e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/556936
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
|
For #59670
Change-Id: Iec85ee7312bb566b3f1224424f7d27bf4e408b13
GitHub-Last-Rev: c620abf9673e166505821d75717e820776abc302
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64905
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/553295
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Earlier in the development of the new tracer, m.id was used as a the
canonical ID for threads. Later, we switched to m.procid because it
matches the underlying OS resource. However, in that switch, we missed a
spot.
The tracer catches and emits statuses for goroutines that have remained
in either waiting or syscall across a whole generation, and emits a
thread ID for the latter set. The ID being used here, however, was m.id
instead of m.procid, like the rest of the tracer.
This CL also adds a regression test. In order to make the regression
test actually catch the failure, we also have to make the parser a
little less lenient about GoStatus events with GoSyscall: if this isn't
the first generation, then we should've seen the goroutine bound to an
M already when its status is getting emitted for its context. If we emit
the wrong ID, then we'll catch the issue when we emit the right ID when
the goroutine exits the syscall.
Fixes #65196.
Change-Id: I78b64fbea65308de5e1291c478a082a732a8bf9f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/557456
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Currently, freedefer's API forces a subtle and fragile situation. It
requires that the caller unlink the _defer from the G list, but
freedefer itself is responsible for zeroing some _defer fields. In the
window between these two steps, we have to prevent stack growth
because stack growth walks the defer list (which no longer contains
the unlinked defer) to adjust pointers, and would thus leave an
unadjusted and potentially invalid pointer behind in the _defer before
freedefer zeroes it.
This setup puts part of this subtle responsibility on the caller and
also means freedefer must be nosplit, which forces other shenanigans
to avoid nosplit overflows.
We can simplify all of this by replacing freedefer with a new popDefer
function that's responsible for both unlinking and zeroing the _defer,
in addition to freeing it.
Some history: prior to regabi, defer records contained their argument
frame, which deferreturn copied to the stack before freeing the defer
record (and subsequently running the defer). Since that argument frame
didn't have a valid stack map until we ran the deferred function, the
non-preemptible window was much larger and more difficult to isolate.
Now we use normal closure calls to capture defer state and call the
defer, so the non-preemptible window is narrowed to just the unlinking
step.
Change-Id: I7cf95ba18e1e2e7d73f616b9ed9fb38f5e725d72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/553696
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
|
|
winmm.dll is only used for timeBeginPeriod and timeEndPeriod, which are
not needed on Windows versions supporting high resolution timers, that
is Windows 10 version 1803, and later.
Updates #56745.
Change-Id: Ie9576638fb8d2b4e648283bec3170aefa76f9f82
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/556935
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
|
|
For #59670
Change-Id: If2b05b1ba30b607b518577b0e11ba5a0b07999c5
GitHub-Last-Rev: a664aa18b5ef674dc2d05c1f7533e1974d265894
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64906
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/553276
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Currently the new execution tracer's handling of CPU profile samples is
very best-effort. The same CPU profile buffer is used across
generations, leading to a high probability that CPU samples will bleed
across generations. Also, because the CPU profile buffer (not the trace
buffer the samples get written into) isn't guaranteed to be flushed when
we close out a generation, nor when tracing stops. This has led to test
failures, but can more generally just lead to lost samples.
In general, lost samples are considered OK. The CPU profile buffer is
only read from every 100 ms, so if it fills up too much before then, old
samples will get overwritten. The tests already account for this, and in
that sense the CPU profile samples are already best-effort. But with
actual CPU profiles, this is really the only condition under which
samples are dropped.
This CL aims to align CPU profiles better with traces by eliminating
all best-effort parts of the implementation aside from the possibility
of dropped samples from a full buffer.
To achieve this, this CL adds a second CPU profile buffer and has the
SIGPROF handler pick which CPU profile buffer to use based on the
generation, much like every other part of the tracer. The SIGPROF
handler then reads the trace generation, but not before ensuring it
can't change: it grabs its own thread's trace seqlock. It's possible
that a SIGPROF signal lands while this seqlock is already held by the
thread. Luckily this is detectable and the SIGPROF handler can simply
elide the locking if this happens (the tracer will already wait until
all threads exit their seqlock critical section).
Now that there are two CPU profile buffers written to, the read side
needs to change. Instead of calling traceAcquire/traceRelease for every
single CPU sample event, the trace CPU profile reader goroutine holds
this conceptual lock over the entirety of flushing a buffer. This means
it can pick the CPU profile buffer for the current generation to flush.
With all this machinery in place, we're now at a point where all CPU
profile samples get divided into either the previous generation or the
current generation. This is good, since it means that we're able to
emit profile samples into the correct generation, avoiding surprises in
the final trace. All that's missing is to flush the CPU profile buffer
from the previous generation, once the runtime has moved on from that
generation. That is, when the generation counter updates, there may yet
be CPU profile samples sitting in the last generation's buffer. So,
traceCPUFlush now first flushes the CPU profile buffer, followed by any
trace buffers containing CPU profile samples.
The end result of all this is that no sample gets left behind unless it
gets overwritten in the CPU profile buffer in the first place. CPU
profile samples in the trace will now also get attributed to the right
generation, since the SIGPROF handler now participates in the tracer's
synchronization across trace generations.
Fixes #55317.
Change-Id: I47719fad164c544eef0bb12f99c8f3c15358e344
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/555495
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Updates #25448
Change-Id: Ia1b7a376f5175f67e14ad4bd065d6e8ad5250d38
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/536955
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
Very occasionally, at least on linux/386, strace itself will crash in
TestUsingVDSO. Detect these crashes and just skip the test.
Fixes #63734.
Change-Id: I050494459d47dd96c0b8dc0b16353cb532fba93e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/556357
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
This test exercises the SIGQUIT crash loop and managed to trigger the
race from #65138 at least once.
For #65138.
Fixes #64752.
Change-Id: I11091510aa7ae4f58b1d748e53df2e3e3dbfb323
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/556356
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I8fe66326994894b17ce0eda991bba942844d26b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/541475
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
CL 555355 has a bug in it - the GC program flag was also used to decide
when to free the unrolled bitmap. After that CL, we just don't free any
unrolled bitmaps, leading to a memory leak.
Use a separate flag to track types that need to be freed when their
corresponding object is freed.
Change-Id: I841b65492561f5b5e1853875fbd8e8a872205a84
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/555416
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
It doesn't have a GC program - the whole point is that it is
the unrolled version of a GC program.
Fortunately, this isn't a bug as (*mspan).typePointersOfUnchecked
ignores the GCProg flag and just uses GCData as a bitmap unconditionally.
Change-Id: I2508af85af4a1806946e54c893120c5cc0cc3da3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/555355
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
CL 549536 intended to decouple the internal implementation of rwmutex
from the semantic meaning of an rwmutex read/write lock in the static
lock ranking.
Unfortunately, it was not thought through well enough. The internals
were represented with the rwmutexR and rwmutexW lock ranks. The idea was
that the internal lock ranks need not model the higher-level ordering,
since those have separate rankings. That is incorrect; rwmutexW is held
for the duration of a write lock, so it must be ranked before any lock
taken while any write lock is held, which is precisely what we were
trying to avoid.
This is visible in violations like:
0 : execW 11 0x0
1 : rwmutexW 51 0x111d9c8
2 : fin 30 0x111d3a0
fatal error: lock ordering problem
execW < fin is modeled, but rwmutexW < fin is missing.
Fix this by eliminating the rwmutexR/W lock ranks shared across
different types of rwmutex. Instead require users to define an
additional "internal" lock rank to represent the implementation details
of rwmutex.rLock. We can avoid an additional "internal" lock rank for
rwmutex.wLock because the existing writeRank has the same semantics for
semantic and internal locking. i.e., writeRank is held for the duration
of a write lock, which is exactly how rwmutex.wLock is used, so we can
use writeRank directly on wLock.
For #64722.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-staticlockranking
Change-Id: Ia572de188a46ba8fe054ae28537648beaa16b12c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/555055
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Currently go test -msan runtime always fails on loong64, arm64
and amd64. Changed the variable name to sz to match the
function prototypes.
For #64256
Change-Id: Ida71197307016520deb39293927850d47845140a
GitHub-Last-Rev: 0ee1e3bb093e682ef325d9860a8fed67570ca345
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64572
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547696
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
due to a recent change, this experiment does not compile at all. This
simply fixes to pass in the new required parameter.
Change-Id: Idce0e72fa436a7acf4923717913deb3a37847fe2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/551415
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
The backing store for the scavengeIndex chunks slice is allocated on demand
as page allocation occurs. When pageAlloc.grow is called, a range is
allocated from a reserved region, before scavengeIndex.grow is called
to ensure that the chunks needed to manage this new range have a valid
backing store. The valid region for chunks is recorded as the index min
and index max. Any changes need to take the existing valid range into
consideration and ensure that a contiguous valid range is maintained.
However, a bug in the min index handling can currently lead to an existing
part of the chunk slice backing store being zeroed via remapping. Initially,
there is no backing store allocated and both min and max are zero. As soon
as an allocation occurs max will be non-zero, however it is still valid for
min to be zero depending on the base addresses of the page allocations. A
sequence like the following will trigger the bug:
1. A page allocation occurs requiring chunks [0, 512) (after rounding) - a
sysMap occurs for the backing store, min is set to 0 and max is set
to 512.
2. A page allocation occurs requiring chunks [512, 1024) - another sysMap
occurs for this part of the backing store, max is set to 1024, however
min is incorrectly set to 512, since haveMin == 0 (validly).
3. Another page allocation occurs requiring chunks [0, 512) - since min is
currently 512 a sysMap occurs for the already mapped and inuse part
of the backing store from [0, 512), zeroing the chunk data.
Correct this by only updating min when either haveMax == 0 (the
uninitialised case) or when needMin < haveMin (the case where the new
backing store range is actually below the current allocation). Remove
the unnecessary haveMax == 0 check for updating max, as the existing
needMax > haveMax case already covers this.
Fixes #63385
Change-Id: I9deed74c4ffa187c98286fe7110e5d735e81f35f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/553135
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
|
|
Change-Id: I7156e7858e8f06459818e03729c644d64e04d43c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/549356
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Fix rendering of link to runtime/debug.ReadGCStats in package overview:
as the package is not imported we must specify the absolute package
name.
Change-Id: I123db49eee05e6812427e19873e628b4e4feb203
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/549735
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
|
|
CL 549796 adds race annotations to godebugInc. It uses racerelease
to model a CompareAndSwap. However, a CompareAndSwap is
essentially a load and a store. Modeling it as just racerelease
makes it not synchronized with other racerelease, i.e. other CAS.
For the following execution
thread A B
load, got nil
load, got nil
set *inc
set *inc
racerelease
CAS success
racerelease
CAS fail
load
raceacquire
use *inc (from A)
On thread B, the raceacquire synchronizes with the previous
racerelease, which is not synchronized with racerelease on thread
A, so it doesn't know that the use of *inc on thread B is after
the set on thread A, and will report a race.
Change it to use racereleasemerge, which synchronizes with
previous racerelease and racereleasemerge. So in the case above it
knows thread B's CAS is after thread A's.
Also remove stale comment that was more relevant when the code
used atomic store, where CL 549796 changed to CAS.
Updates #64649.
Change-Id: I17671090a19c0699fcb4e6481e2abd98ef2e5542
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/551856
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
|
|
This test was added to check new mutex profile functionality.
Specifically, it checks to make sure that the functionality behind
GODEBUG=runtimecontentionstacks works. The runtime currently tracks
contention from runtime-internal mutexes in mutex profiles, but it does
not record stack traces for them, attributing the time to a dummy
symbol. This GODEBUG enables collecting stacks.
Just disable the test. Even if this functionality breaks, it won't
affect Go users and it'll help keep the builders green. It's fine to
leave the test because this will be revisited in the next dev cycle.
For #64253.
Change-Id: I7938fe0f036fc4e4a0764f030e691e312ec2c9b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/550775
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Eli Bendersky <eliben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
Currently, lock ranking doesn't really try to model rwmutex. It records
the internal locks rLock and wLock, but in a subpar fashion:
1. wLock is held from lock to unlock, so it works OK, but it conflates
write locks of all rwmutexes as rwmutexW, rather than allowing
different rwmutexes to have different rankings.
2. rLock is an internal implementation detail that is only taken when
there is contention in rlock. As as result, the reader lock path is
almost never checked.
Add proper modeling. rwmutexR and rwmutexW remain as the ranks of the
internal locks, which have their own ordering. The new init method is
passed the ranks of the higher level lock that this represents, just
like lockInit for mutex.
execW ordered before MALLOC captures the case from #64722. i.e., there
can be allocation between BeforeFork and AfterFork.
For #64722.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-staticlockranking
Change-Id: I23335b28faa42fb04f1bc9da02fdf54d1616cd28
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/549536
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib16986fb088030b93140e48c17e3d7bb2c9312cf
GitHub-Last-Rev: 41572879f8f45c963c0e3ab9862bc0de59781a13
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64731
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/549956
Run-TryBot: Jes Cok <xigua67damn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
|
|
Also use CompareAndSwap to make the code actually less racy.
Added a test which will be meaningful when run under the race
detector (tested it -race with broken fix in runtime, it failed).
Fixes #64649
Change-Id: I5972e08901d1adc8ba74858edad7eba91be1b0ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/549796
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I10a3308c19da08d2ff0c8077bb74ad888ee04fea
GitHub-Last-Rev: 3e95b71384a25e0b29029731b72cf2c7f6a96055
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64077
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/541755
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
This commit is aimed at improving the readability and consistency
of the code base. Extraneous newline characters were present after
some return statements, creating unnecessary separation in the code.
Fixes #64610
Change-Id: Ic1b05bf11761c4dff22691c2f1c3755f66d341f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/548316
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
|
|
When generic function[a,b] is inlined to the same generic function[b,a]
with different types (not recursion) it is expected to get a pprof with
a single Location with two functions. However due to incorrect check
for generics names using runtime.Frame.Function, the profileBuilder
assumes it is a recursion and emits separate Location.
This change fixes the recursion check for generics functions by using
runtime_expandFinalInlineFrame
Fixes #64641
Change-Id: I3f58818f08ee322b281daa377fa421555ad328c9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/549135
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Use a GODEBUG to choose which certificate policy field to use. If
x509usepolicies=1 is set, use the Policies field, otherwise use the
PolicyIdentifiers field.
Fixes #64248
Change-Id: I3f0b56102e0bac4ebe800497717c61c58ef3f092
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546916
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
profileBuilder is using Frame->Function as key for checking if we already
emitted a function. However for generics functions it has dots there [...],
so sometimes for different functions with different generics types,
the profileBuilder emits wrong functions.
Fixes #64528
Change-Id: I8b39245e0b18f4288ce758c912c6748f87cba39a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546815
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
The pointer stored in mspan.largeType is an invalid pointer when
the span is an arena. We need to make sure that pointer isn't seen
by the garbage collector, as it might barf on it. Make sure we
zero the pointer using a uintptr write so the old value isn't picked
up by the write barrier.
The mspan.largeType field itself is in a NotInHeap struct, so a heap
scan won't find it. The only way we find it is when writing it, or
when reading it and putting it in a GC-reachable location. I think we
might need to audit the runtime to make sure these pointers aren't
being passed in places where the GC might (non-conservatively) scan a
stack frame it lives in. (It might be ok, many such places are either
systemstack or nosplit.)
Change-Id: Ie059d054e0da4d48a4c4b3be88b8e1e46ffa7d10
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/548535
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Callers should be using math/rand/v2.Uint64 instead,
but there are lots of linkname references to runtime.fastrand
in public code. If we break it all now, that will require people
to use //go:build tags to use rand/v2.Uint64 with Go 1.22
and keep using the linkname for earlier versions.
Instead, leave the linkname working and then we can remove
it in Go 1.24, at which point everyone should be able to use
math/rand/v2.Uint64 unconditionally.
Change-Id: I7287ca4f67c270b009562313661cc28a4c2219a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/548235
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
|
This is a partial revert of CL 483137.
CL 483137 started checking errors in postDecode, which is good. Now we
can catch more malformed pprof protos. However this made
TestEmptyProfile fail, so an early return was added when the profile was
"empty" (no samples).
Unfortunately, this was problematic. Profiles with no samples can still
be valid, but skipping postDecode meant that the resulting Profile was
missing values from the string table. In particular, net/http/pprof
needs to parse empty profiles in order to pass through the sample and
period types to a final output proto. CL 483137 broke this behavior.
internal/profile.Parse is only used in two places: in cmd/compile to
parse PGO pprof profiles, and in net/http/pprof to parse before/after
pprof profiles for delta profiles. In both cases, the input is never
literally empty (0 bytes). Even a pprof proto with no samples still
contains some header fields, such as sample and period type. Upstream
github.com/google/pprof/profile even has an explicit error on 0 byte
input, so `go tool pprof` will not support such an input.
Thus TestEmptyProfile was misleading; this profile doesn't need to
support empty input at all.
Resolve this by removing TestEmptyProfile and replacing it with an
explicit error on empty input, as upstream
github.com/google/pprof/profile has. For non-empty input, always run
postDecode to ensure the string table is processed.
TestConvertCPUProfileEmpty is reverted back to assert the values from
before CL 483137. Note that in this case "Empty" means no samples, not a
0 byte input.
Continue to allow empty files for PGO in order to minimize the chance of
last minute breakage if some users have empty files.
Fixes #64566.
Change-Id: I83a1f0200ae225ac6da0009d4b2431fe215b283f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547996
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
|
Adding explicit section headers makes it cleaner to split the profile
descriptions into multiple paragraphs, as there is now an explicit
transition from discussion of one profile type to the next.
For #14689.
Change-Id: Ifcff918367e91a165ee5f74423be3935b421972b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547955
Reviewed-by: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Amazingly, we seem to have nearly no in-tree documentation on the
semantics of block and mutex profiles. Add brief summaries, including
the new behavior from CL 506415 and CL 544195.
For #14689.
For #44920.
For #57071.
For #61015.
Change-Id: I1a6edce7c434fcb43f17c83eb362b1f9d1a32df1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547057
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
The exported API is only available with GOEXPERIMENT=rangefunc.
This will let Go 1.22 users who want to experiment with rangefuncs
access an efficient implementation of iter.Pull and iter.Pull2.
For #61897.
Change-Id: I6ef5fa8f117567efe4029b7b8b0f4d9b85697fb7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/543319
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
/sync/mutex/wait/total:seconds
For #57071.
Change-Id: I7ce6c35bed95a6ea3cdc17007f861c5dd82404d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547056
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
profileruntimelocks is new in CL 544195, but the name is deceptive. Even
with profileruntimelocks=0, runtime-internal locks are still profiled.
The actual difference is that call stacks are not collected. Instead all
contention is reported at runtime._LostContendedLock.
Rename this setting to runtimecontentionstacks to make its name more
aligned with its behavior.
In addition, for this release the default is profileruntimelocks=0,
meaning that users are fairly likely to encounter
runtime._LostContendedLock. Rename it to
runtime._LostContendedRuntimeLock in an attempt to make it more
intuitive that these are runtime locks, not locks in application code.
For #57071.
Change-Id: I38aac28b2c0852db643d53b1eab3f3bc42a43393
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547055
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv>
|
|
Move ChaCha8 code into internal/chacha8rand and use it to implement
runtime.rand, which is used for the unseeded global source for
both math/rand and math/rand/v2. This also affects the calculation of
the start point for iteration over very very large maps (when the
32-bit fastrand is not big enough).
The benefit is that misuse of the global random number generators
in math/rand and math/rand/v2 in contexts where non-predictable
randomness is important for security reasons is no longer a
security problem, removing a common mistake among programmers
who are unaware of the different kinds of randomness.
The cost is an extra 304 bytes per thread stored in the m struct
plus 2-3ns more per random uint64 due to the more sophisticated
algorithm. Using PCG looks like it would cost about the same,
although I haven't benchmarked that.
Before this, the math/rand and math/rand/v2 global generator
was wyrand (https://github.com/wangyi-fudan/wyhash).
For math/rand, using wyrand instead of the Mitchell/Reeds/Thompson
ALFG was justifiable, since the latter was not any better.
But for math/rand/v2, the global generator really should be
at least as good as one of the well-studied, specific algorithms
provided directly by the package, and it's not.
(Wyrand is still reasonable for scheduling and cache decisions.)
Good randomness does have a cost: about twice wyrand.
Also rationalize the various runtime rand references.
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: math/rand/v2
cpu: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
│ bbb48afeb7.amd64 │ 5cf807d1ea.amd64 │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
ChaCha8-32 1.862n ± 2% 1.861n ± 2% ~ (p=0.825 n=20)
PCG_DXSM-32 1.471n ± 1% 1.460n ± 2% ~ (p=0.153 n=20)
SourceUint64-32 1.636n ± 2% 1.582n ± 1% -3.30% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalInt64-32 2.087n ± 1% 3.663n ± 1% +75.54% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalInt64Parallel-32 0.1042n ± 1% 0.2026n ± 1% +94.48% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalUint64-32 2.263n ± 2% 3.724n ± 1% +64.57% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalUint64Parallel-32 0.1019n ± 1% 0.1973n ± 1% +93.67% (p=0.000 n=20)
Int64-32 1.771n ± 1% 1.774n ± 1% ~ (p=0.449 n=20)
Uint64-32 1.863n ± 2% 1.866n ± 1% ~ (p=0.364 n=20)
GlobalIntN1000-32 3.134n ± 3% 4.730n ± 2% +50.95% (p=0.000 n=20)
IntN1000-32 2.489n ± 1% 2.489n ± 1% ~ (p=0.683 n=20)
Int64N1000-32 2.521n ± 1% 2.516n ± 1% ~ (p=0.394 n=20)
Int64N1e8-32 2.479n ± 1% 2.478n ± 2% ~ (p=0.743 n=20)
Int64N1e9-32 2.530n ± 2% 2.514n ± 2% ~ (p=0.193 n=20)
Int64N2e9-32 2.501n ± 1% 2.494n ± 1% ~ (p=0.616 n=20)
Int64N1e18-32 3.227n ± 1% 3.205n ± 1% ~ (p=0.101 n=20)
Int64N2e18-32 3.647n ± 1% 3.599n ± 1% ~ (p=0.019 n=20)
Int64N4e18-32 5.135n ± 1% 5.069n ± 2% ~ (p=0.034 n=20)
Int32N1000-32 2.657n ± 1% 2.637n ± 1% ~ (p=0.180 n=20)
Int32N1e8-32 2.636n ± 1% 2.636n ± 1% ~ (p=0.763 n=20)
Int32N1e9-32 2.660n ± 2% 2.638n ± 1% ~ (p=0.358 n=20)
Int32N2e9-32 2.662n ± 2% 2.618n ± 2% ~ (p=0.064 n=20)
Float32-32 2.272n ± 2% 2.239n ± 2% ~ (p=0.194 n=20)
Float64-32 2.272n ± 1% 2.286n ± 2% ~ (p=0.763 n=20)
ExpFloat64-32 3.762n ± 1% 3.744n ± 1% ~ (p=0.171 n=20)
NormFloat64-32 3.706n ± 1% 3.655n ± 2% ~ (p=0.066 n=20)
Perm3-32 32.93n ± 3% 34.62n ± 1% +5.13% (p=0.000 n=20)
Perm30-32 202.9n ± 1% 204.0n ± 1% ~ (p=0.482 n=20)
Perm30ViaShuffle-32 115.0n ± 1% 114.9n ± 1% ~ (p=0.358 n=20)
ShuffleOverhead-32 112.8n ± 1% 112.7n ± 1% ~ (p=0.692 n=20)
Concurrent-32 2.107n ± 0% 3.725n ± 1% +76.75% (p=0.000 n=20)
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: math/rand/v2
│ bbb48afeb7.arm64 │ 5cf807d1ea.arm64 │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
ChaCha8-8 2.480n ± 0% 2.429n ± 0% -2.04% (p=0.000 n=20)
PCG_DXSM-8 2.531n ± 0% 2.530n ± 0% ~ (p=0.877 n=20)
SourceUint64-8 2.534n ± 0% 2.533n ± 0% ~ (p=0.732 n=20)
GlobalInt64-8 2.172n ± 1% 4.794n ± 0% +120.67% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalInt64Parallel-8 0.4320n ± 0% 0.9605n ± 0% +122.32% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalUint64-8 2.182n ± 0% 4.770n ± 0% +118.58% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalUint64Parallel-8 0.4307n ± 0% 0.9583n ± 0% +122.51% (p=0.000 n=20)
Int64-8 4.107n ± 0% 4.104n ± 0% ~ (p=0.416 n=20)
Uint64-8 4.080n ± 0% 4.080n ± 0% ~ (p=0.052 n=20)
GlobalIntN1000-8 2.814n ± 2% 5.643n ± 0% +100.50% (p=0.000 n=20)
IntN1000-8 4.141n ± 0% 4.139n ± 0% ~ (p=0.140 n=20)
Int64N1000-8 4.140n ± 0% 4.140n ± 0% ~ (p=0.313 n=20)
Int64N1e8-8 4.140n ± 0% 4.139n ± 0% ~ (p=0.103 n=20)
Int64N1e9-8 4.139n ± 0% 4.140n ± 0% ~ (p=0.761 n=20)
Int64N2e9-8 4.140n ± 0% 4.140n ± 0% ~ (p=0.636 n=20)
Int64N1e18-8 5.266n ± 0% 5.326n ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.001 n=20)
Int64N2e18-8 6.052n ± 0% 6.167n ± 0% +1.90% (p=0.000 n=20)
Int64N4e18-8 8.826n ± 0% 9.051n ± 0% +2.55% (p=0.000 n=20)
Int32N1000-8 4.127n ± 0% 4.132n ± 0% +0.12% (p=0.000 n=20)
Int32N1e8-8 4.126n ± 0% 4.131n ± 0% +0.12% (p=0.000 n=20)
Int32N1e9-8 4.127n ± 0% 4.132n ± 0% +0.12% (p=0.000 n=20)
Int32N2e9-8 4.132n ± 0% 4.131n ± 0% ~ (p=0.017 n=20)
Float32-8 4.109n ± 0% 4.105n ± 0% ~ (p=0.379 n=20)
Float64-8 4.107n ± 0% 4.106n ± 0% ~ (p=0.867 n=20)
ExpFloat64-8 5.339n ± 0% 5.383n ± 0% +0.82% (p=0.000 n=20)
NormFloat64-8 5.735n ± 0% 5.737n ± 1% ~ (p=0.856 n=20)
Perm3-8 26.65n ± 0% 26.80n ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.000 n=20)
Perm30-8 194.8n ± 1% 197.0n ± 0% +1.18% (p=0.000 n=20)
Perm30ViaShuffle-8 156.6n ± 0% 157.6n ± 1% +0.61% (p=0.000 n=20)
ShuffleOverhead-8 124.9n ± 0% 125.5n ± 0% +0.52% (p=0.000 n=20)
Concurrent-8 2.434n ± 3% 5.066n ± 0% +108.09% (p=0.000 n=20)
goos: linux
goarch: 386
pkg: math/rand/v2
cpu: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
│ bbb48afeb7.386 │ 5cf807d1ea.386 │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
ChaCha8-32 11.295n ± 1% 4.748n ± 2% -57.96% (p=0.000 n=20)
PCG_DXSM-32 7.693n ± 1% 7.738n ± 2% ~ (p=0.542 n=20)
SourceUint64-32 7.658n ± 2% 7.622n ± 2% ~ (p=0.344 n=20)
GlobalInt64-32 3.473n ± 2% 7.526n ± 2% +116.73% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalInt64Parallel-32 0.3198n ± 0% 0.5444n ± 0% +70.22% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalUint64-32 3.612n ± 0% 7.575n ± 1% +109.69% (p=0.000 n=20)
GlobalUint64Parallel-32 0.3168n ± 0% 0.5403n ± 0% +70.51% (p=0.000 n=20)
Int64-32 7.673n ± 2% 7.789n ± 1% ~ (p=0.122 n=20)
Uint64-32 7.773n ± 1% 7.827n ± 2% ~ (p=0.920 n=20)
GlobalIntN1000-32 6.268n ± 1% 9.581n ± 1% +52.87% (p=0.000 n=20)
IntN1000-32 10.33n ± 2% 10.45n ± 1% ~ (p=0.233 n=20)
Int64N1000-32 10.98n ± 2% 11.01n ± 1% ~ (p=0.401 n=20)
Int64N1e8-32 11.19n ± 2% 10.97n ± 1% ~ (p=0.033 n=20)
Int64N1e9-32 11.06n ± 1% 11.08n ± 1% ~ (p=0.498 n=20)
Int64N2e9-32 11.10n ± 1% 11.01n ± 2% ~ (p=0.995 n=20)
Int64N1e18-32 15.23n ± 2% 15.04n ± 1% ~ (p=0.973 n=20)
Int64N2e18-32 15.89n ± 1% 15.85n ± 1% ~ (p=0.409 n=20)
Int64N4e18-32 18.96n ± 2% 19.34n ± 2% ~ (p=0.048 n=20)
Int32N1000-32 10.46n ± 2% 10.44n ± 2% ~ (p=0.480 n=20)
Int32N1e8-32 10.46n ± 2% 10.49n ± 2% ~ (p=0.951 n=20)
Int32N1e9-32 10.28n ± 2% 10.26n ± 1% ~ (p=0.431 n=20)
Int32N2e9-32 10.50n ± 2% 10.44n ± 2% ~ (p=0.249 n=20)
Float32-32 13.80n ± 2% 13.80n ± 2% ~ (p=0.751 n=20)
Float64-32 23.55n ± 2% 23.87n ± 0% ~ (p=0.408 n=20)
ExpFloat64-32 15.36n ± 1% 15.29n ± 2% ~ (p=0.316 n=20)
NormFloat64-32 13.57n ± 1% 13.79n ± 1% +1.66% (p=0.005 n=20)
Perm3-32 45.70n ± 2% 46.99n ± 2% +2.81% (p=0.001 n=20)
Perm30-32 399.0n ± 1% 403.8n ± 1% +1.19% (p=0.006 n=20)
Perm30ViaShuffle-32 349.0n ± 1% 350.4n ± 1% ~ (p=0.909 n=20)
ShuffleOverhead-32 322.3n ± 1% 323.8n ± 1% ~ (p=0.410 n=20)
Concurrent-32 3.331n ± 1% 7.312n ± 1% +119.50% (p=0.000 n=20)
For #61716.
Change-Id: Ibdddeed85c34d9ae397289dc899e04d4845f9ed2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/516860
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Go 1.21.1 and Go 1.22 have ceased working around an issue with Linux
kernel defaults for transparent huge pages that can result in excessive
memory overheads. (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93111)
Many Linux distributions disable huge pages altogether these days, so
this problem isn't quite as far-reaching as it used to be. Also, the
problem only affects Go programs with very particular memory usage
patterns.
That being said, because the runtime used to actively deal with this
problem (but with some unpredictable behavior), it's preventing users
that don't have a lot of control over their execution environment from
upgrading to Go beyond Go 1.20.
This change adds a GODEBUG to smooth over the transition. The GODEBUG
setting disables transparent huge pages for all heap memory on Linux,
which is much more predictable than restoring the old behavior.
Fixes #64332.
Change-Id: I73b1894337f0f0b1a5a17b90da1221e118e0b145
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547475
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Make sure to alloc+copy large keys and values instead of aliasing them,
when they might be updated by a future assignment.
Fixes #64474
Change-Id: Ie2226a81cf3897e4e2ee24472f2966d397ace53f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546515
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
|
|
Fixes #64542.
Change-Id: Ic0dc37dfefac83fd3aab6dacfec58b8ee9105fbd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/547135
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
|
|
Let the fault thread to crash the program to make sure while gdb coredump file could see the correct backtrace in the number one thread in gdb.
Fixes #63277.
Change-Id: Ie4473f76f0feba596091433918bcd35a4ff7e11b
GitHub-Last-Rev: f4615c23f663a2f0794ca9e5c86fc2f0cc8552d7
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63666
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/536895
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
CL 546025 failed to check if mp.curg is nil, causing all sorts of
failures. It can very well be nil in this context.
For #64318.
Fixes #64507.
Change-Id: I4a95c3fa16d5e1dee8041394c4bdb9c6ba04f032
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546636
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
The GoSyscallBegin event is a signal for both the P and the G to enter a
syscall state for the trace parser. (Ps can't have their own event
because it's too hard to model. As soon as the P enters _Psyscall it can
get stolen out of it.) But there's a window in time between when that
event is emitted and when the P enters _Psyscall where the P's status
can get emitted. In this window the tracer will emit the wrong status:
Running instead of Syscall. Really any call into the tracer could emit a
status event for the P, but in this particular case it's when running a
safepoint function that explicitly emits an event for the P's status.
The fix is straightforward. The source-of-truth on syscall status is the
G's status, so the function that emits the P's status just needs to
check the status of any G attached to it. If it's in _Gsyscall, then the
tracer should emit a Syscall status for the P if it's in _Prunning.
Fixes #64318.
Change-Id: I3b0fb0d41ff578e62810b04fa5a3ef73e2929b0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/546025
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
temporary resource shortage
As per #62352 the invocation of vmmap may fail (very rarely) due to
a temporary lack of resources on the test runner machine. This PR
allows for retrying the invocation a fixed number of times before
giving up. This is because we suspect the failure is due to
sensible to retry.
Fixes: #62352
Change-Id: I51aa66b949753d8127cc307181b6ef32e91d5b05
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545935
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
|
|
fix typo in `countAlloc` doc
Change-Id: I9f0752412b7a7dfae4915870edeab4ac52e38b2d
GitHub-Last-Rev: 6080d3c03ba6cacb1874af9724cfeb7cae27b78f
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#64357
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544755
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hiro Hamada <laciferin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
ReadMemStats has a few assertions it makes about the consistency of the
stats it's about to produce. Specifically, how those stats line up with
runtime-internal stats. These checks are generally useful, but crashing
just because some stats are wrong is a heavy price to pay.
For a long time this wasn't a problem, but very recently it became a
real problem. It turns out that there's real benign skew that can happen
wherein sysmon (which doesn't synchronize with a STW) generates a trace
event when tracing is enabled, and may mutate some stats while
ReadMemStats is running its checks.
Fix this by synchronizing with both sysmon and the tracer. This is a bit
heavy-handed, but better that than false positives.
Also, put the checks behind a debug mode. We want to reduce the risk of
backporting this change, and again, it's not great to crash just because
user-facing stats are off. Still, enable this debug mode during the
runtime tests so we don't lose quite as much coverage from disabling
these checks by default.
Fixes #64401.
Change-Id: I9adb3e5c7161d207648d07373a11da8a5f0fda9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/545277
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Geisendörfer <felix.geisendoerfer@datadoghq.com>
|
|
Most contention on the runtime locks inside semaphores is observed in
runtime.semrelease1, but it can also appear in runtime.semacquire1. When
examining contention profiles in TestRuntimeLockMetricsAndProfile, allow
call stacks that include either.
For #64253
Change-Id: Id4f16af5e9a28615ab5032a3197e8df90f7e382f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/544375
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|