| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Several comments refer to bitset as 'instrinsified', which is likely
a typo, because it refers to the output of the intrinsics implemented
with SIMD.
Change-Id: I00f26b8d8128592ee0e9dc8a1b1480c93a9542d6
GitHub-Last-Rev: 8a4236710979f2f969210e0b261bdb9ae44f3321
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#74624
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/688016
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
This will make future uses of the map faster because the probe
sequences will likely be shorter.
Change-Id: If10f3af49a5feaff7d1b82337bbbfb93bcd9dcb5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/633076
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
This lets the inliner do a better job optimizing the mapKeyError call.
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: runtime
cpu: AMD Ryzen 5 4600G with Radeon Graphics
│ /tmp/before2 │ /tmp/after3 │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MapAccessZero/Key=int64-12 1.875n ± 0% 1.875n ± 0% ~ (p=0.506 n=25)
MapAccessZero/Key=int32-12 1.875n ± 0% 1.875n ± 0% ~ (p=0.082 n=25)
MapAccessZero/Key=string-12 1.902n ± 1% 1.902n ± 1% ~ (p=0.256 n=25)
MapAccessZero/Key=mediumType-12 2.816n ± 0% 1.958n ± 0% -30.47% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapAccessZero/Key=bigType-12 2.815n ± 0% 1.935n ± 0% -31.26% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapAccessEmpty/Key=int64-12 1.942n ± 0% 2.109n ± 0% +8.60% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapAccessEmpty/Key=int32-12 2.110n ± 0% 1.940n ± 0% -8.06% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapAccessEmpty/Key=string-12 2.024n ± 0% 2.109n ± 0% +4.20% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapAccessEmpty/Key=mediumType-12 3.157n ± 0% 2.344n ± 0% -25.75% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapAccessEmpty/Key=bigType-12 3.054n ± 0% 2.115n ± 0% -30.75% (p=0.000 n=25)
geomean 2.305n 2.011n -12.75%
Change-Id: Iee83930884dc4c8a791a711aa189a1c93b68d536
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/663495
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
This test fails on GOEXPERIMENT=noswissmap as it is testing behavior
specific to swissmaps. Move it to map_swiss_test.go to skip it on
noswissmap.
We could also switch the test to use NewTestMap, which provides a
swissmap even in GOEXPERIMENT=noswissmap, but that is tedious to use and
noswissmap is going away soon anyway.
For #70886.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-noswissmap
Change-Id: I6a6a636c5ec72217d936cd01e9da36ae127ea2c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/666437
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Before growing, if there are lots of tombstones try to remove them.
If we can remove enough, we can continue at the given size for a
while longer.
Fixes #70886
Change-Id: I71e0d873ae118bb35798314ec25e78eaa5340d73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/640955
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Fixes #73191
Change-Id: I0f8a5a19faa745943a98476c7caf4c97ccdce184
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/663175
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
|
|
On master, lookups on small Swiss Table maps (<= 8 elements) for
non-specialized key types are seemingly a performance regression
compared to the Go 1.23 map implementation (reported in #70849).
Currently, a linear scan is used for gets in these cases.
This CL changes (*Map).getWithKeySmall to instead use the SIMD or SWAR
match on the control bytes to then jump to candidate matching slots,
with sample results below for a 16-byte key. This especially helps the
hit case when the key is unpredictable, which previously had to scan an
unpredictable number of control bytes to find a candidate slot when the
key is unpredictable.
Separately, other CLs in this stack modify the main Swiss Table
benchmarks to randomize lookup key order (vs. previously most of the
benchmarks had a repeating lookup key ordering, which likely is
predictable until the map is too big). We have sample results for the
randomized key order benchmarks followed by results from the older
benchmarks.
The first table below is with randomized key order. For hits, the older
results get slower as there are more elements. With this CL, we see hits
for unpredictable key ordering (sizes 2-8) get a ~1.7x speedup from
~25ns to ~14ns, with a now consistent lookup time for the different
sizes. (The 1 element size map has a predictable key ordering because
there is only one key, and that reports a modest ~0.5ns or ~3%
performance penalty). Misses for unpredictable key order get a ~1.3x
speedup, from ~13ns to ~10ns, with similar results for the 1 element
size.
│ no-fix-new-bmarks │ fix-with-new-bmarks │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=1-4 13.26n ± 0% 13.64n ± 0% +2.90% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=2-4 19.47n ± 0% 13.62n ± 0% -30.05% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=3-4 22.23n ± 0% 13.64n ± 0% -38.68% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=4-4 23.98n ± 0% 13.64n ± 0% -43.11% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=5-4 25.02n ± 0% 13.67n ± 0% -45.35% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=6-4 25.77n ± 1% 13.68n ± 2% -46.89% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=7-4 26.38n ± 0% 13.64n ± 0% -48.28% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=8-4 26.31n ± 0% 13.71n ± 21% -47.90% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=1-4 13.055n ± 0% 9.815n ± 0% -24.82% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=2-4 13.070n ± 0% 9.813n ± 0% -24.92% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=3-4 13.060n ± 0% 9.819n ± 0% -24.82% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=4-4 13.075n ± 0% 9.816n ± 0% -24.92% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=5-4 13.060n ± 0% 9.826n ± 0% -24.76% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=6-4 13.095n ± 19% 9.834n ± 31% -24.90% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=7-4 13.075n ± 19% 9.822n ± 27% -24.88% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=8-4 13.11n ± 16% 12.14n ± 19% -7.43% (p=0.000 n=20)
The next table uses the original benchmarks from just before this CL
stack (i.e., without shuffling lookup keys).
With this CL, we see improvement that is directionally similar to the
above results but not as large, presumably because the branches in the
linear scan are fairly predictable with predictable keys. (The numbers
here also include the time from a mod in the benchmark code, which
seemed to take around ~1/3 of CPU time based on spot checking a couple
of examples, vs. the modified benchmarks shown above have removed that
mod).
│ master-8c3e391573 │ just-fix-with-old-bmarks │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=1-4 20.85n ± 0% 21.69n ± 0% +4.03% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=2-4 21.22n ± 0% 21.70n ± 0% +2.24% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=3-4 21.73n ± 0% 21.71n ± 0% ~ (p=0.158 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=4-4 22.06n ± 0% 21.71n ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=5-4 22.41n ± 0% 21.73n ± 0% -3.01% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=6-4 22.71n ± 0% 21.72n ± 0% -4.38% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=7-4 22.98n ± 0% 21.71n ± 0% -5.53% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=8-4 23.20n ± 0% 21.72n ± 0% -6.36% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=1-4 19.95n ± 0% 17.30n ± 0% -13.28% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=2-4 19.96n ± 0% 17.31n ± 0% -13.28% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=3-4 19.95n ± 0% 17.29n ± 0% -13.33% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=4-4 19.95n ± 0% 17.30n ± 0% -13.29% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=5-4 19.96n ± 25% 17.32n ± 0% -13.22% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=6-4 19.99n ± 24% 17.29n ± 0% -13.51% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=7-4 19.97n ± 20% 17.34n ± 16% -13.14% (p=0.000 n=20)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=smallType/Elem=int32/len=8-4 20.02n ± 11% 17.33n ± 14% -13.44% (p=0.000 n=20)
geomean 21.02n 19.39n -7.78%
See #70849 for additional benchmark results, including results for arm64
(which also means without SIMD support).
Updates #54766
Updates #70700
Fixes #70849
Change-Id: Ic2361bb6fc15b4436d1d1d5be7e4712e547f611b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/634396
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
│ base │ experiment │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MapClone-24 66.802m ± 7% 3.348m ± 2% -94.99% (p=0.000 n=10)
Fixes #70836
Change-Id: I9e192b1ee82e18f5580ff18918307042a337fdcc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/660175
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
Fixes a typo to correctly describe the hash bits of the control word.
Change-Id: Id3c2ae0bd529e579a95258845f9d8028e23d10d2
GitHub-Last-Rev: 1baa81be5d292d5625d5d7788b8ea090453f962c
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#71730
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/649416
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
|
|
Re-enable tests for stack-allocated maps and fast map accessors.
Those are implemented now.
Update #54766
Change-Id: I8c019702bd9fb077b2fe3f7c78e8e9e10d2263a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/642376
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
len(map) is lowered to loading the first field of the map
structure, which is the length. Currently it is a load of an int.
With the old map, the first field is indeed an int. With Swiss
map, however, it is a uint64. On big-endian 32-bit machine,
loading an (32-bit) int from a uint64 would load just the high
bits, which are (probably) all 0. Change to a load with the proper
type.
Fixes #70248.
Change-Id: I39cf2d1e6658dac5a8de25c858e1580e2a14b894
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/638375
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I07e7c8eaa5bd4bac0d576b2f2f4cd3f81b0b77a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/630055
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
|
|
Use similar SIMD operations to the ones used in Abseil. We still
using 8-slot groups (even though the XMM registers could handle 16-slot
groups) to keep the implementation simpler (no changes to the memory
layout of maps).
Still, the implementations of matchH2 and matchEmpty are shorter than
the portable version using standard arithmetic operations. They also
return a packed bitset, which avoids the need to shift in bitset.first.
That said, the packed bitset is a downside in cognitive complexity, as
we have to think about two different possible representations. This
doesn't leak out of the API, but we do need to intrinsify bitset to
switch to a compatible implementation.
The compiler's intrinsics don't support intrinsifying methods, so the
implementations move to free functions.
This makes operations between 0-3% faster on my machine. e.g.,
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=6-12 12.34n ± 1% 11.42n ± 1% -7.46% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=12-12 15.14n ± 2% 14.88n ± 1% -1.72% (p=0.009 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=18-12 15.04n ± 6% 14.66n ± 2% -2.53% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=24-12 15.80n ± 1% 15.48n ± 3% ~ (p=0.444 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=30-12 15.55n ± 4% 14.77n ± 3% -5.02% (p=0.004 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=64-12 15.26n ± 1% 15.05n ± 1% ~ (p=0.055 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=128-12 15.34n ± 1% 15.02n ± 2% -2.09% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=256-12 15.42n ± 1% 15.15n ± 1% -1.75% (p=0.001 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=512-12 15.48n ± 1% 15.18n ± 1% -1.94% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=1024-12 17.38n ± 1% 17.05n ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=2048-12 17.96n ± 0% 17.59n ± 1% -2.06% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=4096-12 18.36n ± 1% 18.18n ± 1% -0.98% (p=0.013 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=8192-12 18.75n ± 0% 18.31n ± 1% -2.35% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=65536-12 26.25n ± 0% 25.95n ± 1% -1.14% (p=0.000 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=262144-12 44.24n ± 1% 44.06n ± 1% ~ (p=0.181 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=1048576-12 85.02n ± 0% 85.35n ± 0% +0.39% (p=0.032 n=25)
MapGetHit/impl=runtimeMap/t=Int64/len=4194304-12 98.87n ± 1% 98.85n ± 1% ~ (p=0.799 n=25)
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-ppc64_power10,gotip-linux-amd64-goamd64v3
Change-Id: Ic1b852f02744404122cb3672900fd95f4625905e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/626277
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
Hashing the key means we have to take the address of it. That inhibits
subsequent optimizations on the key variable.
By hashing a copy, we incur an extra store at the hash callsite, but
we no longer need a load of the key in the inner loop. It can live
in a register throughout. (Technically, it gets spilled around
the call to the hasher, but it gets restored outside the loop.)
Maybe one day we can have special hash functions that take
int64/int32/string instead of *int64/*int32/*string.
Change-Id: Iba3133f6e82328f53c0abcb5eec13ee47c4969d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/629419
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Note this doesn't work with int32 keys because alignment padding can change
the offset of the element.
Change-Id: I27804d3cfc7cc1b7f995f7e29630f0824f0ee899
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/629418
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
|
This reduces the adds required at the return point from 3 to 1.
(The multiply inside g.elem() does get CSE'd with the one inside
g.key(), but the rest of the adds don't.)
Instead, compute the element as just a fixed offset from the key.
Change-Id: Ia4d7664efafcdca5e9daeb77d270651bb186232c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/629535
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
We can reuse the same indirect storage when growing, so we don't
need an additional allocation.
Change-Id: I57adb406becfbec648188ec66f4bb2e94d4b9cab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/625902
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
Missed initializing a field in the stub that lets the noswiss
builder test the swiss implementation.
Change-Id: Ie093478ad3e4301e4fe88ba65c132a9dbccd89a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/628895
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
It is easily recomputed as capacity-1.
This reduces a table from 40 to 32 bytes (on 64-bit archs).
That gets us down one sizeclass.
Change-Id: Icb74fb2de50baa18ca62052c7b2fe8e6af4c8837
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/625198
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
We don't really need the index of the slot we're looking at.
Just keep looking until there are no more filled slots.
This particularly helps when there are only a few filled entries
(packed at the bottom), and we're looking for something that isn't
there. We exit earlier than we would otherwise.
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: runtime
cpu: Apple M2 Ultra
│ baseline │ experiment │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=1-24 2.759n ± 0% 2.779n ± 2% ~ (p=0.055 n=10)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=2-24 2.862n ± 1% 2.922n ± 1% +2.08% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=3-24 3.003n ± 0% 3.061n ± 1% +1.91% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=4-24 3.170n ± 1% 3.188n ± 1% +0.57% (p=0.030 n=10)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=5-24 3.387n ± 1% 3.391n ± 1% ~ (p=0.362 n=10)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-24 3.601n ± 1% 3.584n ± 0% -0.49% (p=0.009 n=10)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=7-24 3.785n ± 1% 3.778n ± 3% ~ (p=0.987 n=10)
MapSmallAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=8-24 3.960n ± 1% 3.946n ± 1% ~ (p=0.256 n=10)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=0-24 2.004n ± 1%
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=1-24 5.145n ± 1% 2.411n ± 1% -53.14% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=2-24 5.128n ± 0% 3.313n ± 1% -35.40% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=3-24 5.159n ± 1% 3.690n ± 1% -28.48% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=4-24 5.117n ± 1% 4.466n ± 6% -12.73% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=5-24 5.115n ± 1% 4.308n ± 1% -15.79% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-24 5.111n ± 1% 4.538n ± 2% -11.19% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=7-24 4.896n ± 4% 4.831n ± 1% -1.33% (p=0.001 n=10)
MapSmallAccessMiss/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=8-24 4.905n ± 1% 5.121n ± 1% +4.40% (p=0.000 n=10)
geomean 3.917n 3.631n -11.11%
Change-Id: Ife26ac457a513af24fa0921b839ee6cd5fed6fba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/627717
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
typ.Group.Size involves two loads.
Instead cache GroupSize as a separate fields of the map type
so we can get to it in just one load.
Change-Id: I10ffdce1c7f75dcf448da14040fda78f0d75fd1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/627716
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
For large strings, do a quick equality check on all the slots.
Only if more than one passes the quick equality check do we
resort to hashing.
│ baseline │ experiment │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MegMap-24 16609.50n ± 1% 13.91n ± 3% -99.92% (p=0.000 n=10)
MegOneMap-24 16655.00n ± 0% 12.27n ± 1% -99.93% (p=0.000 n=10)
MegEqMap-24 41.31µ ± 1% 25.03µ ± 1% -39.40% (p=0.000 n=10)
MegEmptyMap-24 2.034n ± 0% 2.027n ± 2% ~ (p=0.541 n=10)
MegEmptyMapWithInterfaceKey-24 5.931n ± 2% 5.599n ± 1% -5.60% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapStringKeysEight_16-24 8.473n ± 7% 8.224n ± 5% ~ (p=0.315 n=10)
MapStringKeysEight_32-24 8.441n ± 2% 8.147n ± 1% -3.48% (p=0.002 n=10)
MapStringKeysEight_64-24 8.769n ± 1% 8.517n ± 1% -2.87% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapStringKeysEight_128-24 10.73n ± 4% 13.57n ± 8% +26.57% (p=0.000 n=10)
MapStringKeysEight_256-24 12.97n ± 2% 14.35n ± 4% +10.64% (p=0.001 n=10)
MapStringKeysEight_1M-24 17359.50n ± 3% 13.92n ± 4% -99.92% (p=0.000 n=10)
Change-Id: I4cc2ea4edab12a4b03236de626c7bcf0f96b6cc0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/625905
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Iteration over swissmaps with low load (think map with large hint but
only one entry) is signicantly regressed vs old maps. See noswiss vs
swiss-tip below (+60%).
Currently we visit every single slot and individually check if the slot
is full or not.
We can do much better by using the control word to find all full slots
in a group in a single operation. This lets us skip completely empty
groups for instance.
Always using the control match approach is great for maps with low load,
but is a regression for mostly full maps. Mostly full maps have the
majority of slots full, so most calls to mapiternext will return the
next slot. In that case, doing the full group match on every call is
more expensive than checking the individual slot.
Thus we take a hybrid approach: on each call, we first check an
individual slot. If that slot is full, we're done. If that slot is
non-full, then we fall back to doing full group matches.
This trade-off works well. Both mostly empty and mostly full maps
perform nearly as well as doing all matching and all individual,
respectively.
The fast path is placed above the slow path loop rather than combined
(with some sort of `useMatch` variable) into a single loop to help the
compiler's code generation. The compiler really struggles with code
generation on a combined loop for some reason, yielding ~15% additional
instructions/op.
Comparison with old maps prior to this CL:
│ noswiss │ swiss-tip │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MapIter/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-12 11.53n ± 2% 10.64n ± 2% -7.72% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapIter/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=64-12 10.180n ± 2% 9.670n ± 5% -5.01% (p=0.004 n=6)
MapIter/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=65536-12 10.78n ± 1% 10.15n ± 2% -5.84% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapIterLowLoad/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-12 6.116n ± 2% 6.840n ± 2% +11.84% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapIterLowLoad/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=64-12 2.403n ± 2% 3.892n ± 0% +61.95% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapIterLowLoad/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=65536-12 1.940n ± 3% 3.237n ± 1% +66.81% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapPop/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-12 66.20n ± 2% 60.14n ± 3% -9.15% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapPop/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=64-12 97.24n ± 1% 171.35n ± 1% +76.21% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapPop/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=65536-12 826.1n ± 12% 842.5n ± 10% ~ (p=0.937 n=6)
geomean 17.93n 20.96n +16.88%
After this CL:
│ noswiss │ swiss-cl │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MapIter/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-12 11.53n ± 2% 10.90n ± 3% -5.42% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapIter/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=64-12 10.180n ± 2% 9.719n ± 9% -4.53% (p=0.043 n=6)
MapIter/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=65536-12 10.78n ± 1% 10.07n ± 2% -6.63% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapIterLowLoad/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-12 6.116n ± 2% 7.022n ± 1% +14.82% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapIterLowLoad/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=64-12 2.403n ± 2% 1.475n ± 1% -38.63% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapIterLowLoad/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=65536-12 1.940n ± 3% 1.210n ± 6% -37.67% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapPop/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-12 66.20n ± 2% 61.54n ± 2% -7.02% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapPop/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=64-12 97.24n ± 1% 110.10n ± 1% +13.23% (p=0.002 n=6)
MapPop/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=65536-12 826.1n ± 12% 504.7n ± 6% -38.91% (p=0.002 n=6)
geomean 17.93n 15.29n -14.74%
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-ppc64_power10
Change-Id: Ic07f9df763239e85be57873103df5007144fdaef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/627156
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
│ baseline │ experiment │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
MapDeleteLargeKey-24 312.0n ± 6% 162.3n ± 5% -47.97% (p=0.000 n=10)
Change-Id: I31f1f8e3c344cf8abf2e9eb4b51b78fcd67b93c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/625906
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7b3d95c0861ae2b6e0721b65aa75cda036435e9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/625903
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Seems simple, but putting the return after fatal ensures that at the
point of the small group loop, no call has happened so the key is
still in a register. This ensures that we don't have to restore the
key from the stack before the comparison on each iteration. That gets
rid of a load from the inner loop.
name old time/op new time/op delta
MapAccessHit/Key=int64/Elem=int64/len=6-8 4.01ns ± 6% 3.85ns ± 3% -3.92% (p=0.001 n=10+10)
Change-Id: Ia23ac48e6c5522be88f7d9be0ff3489b2dfc52fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/624255
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
Use matchEmptyOrDeleted instead of matchEmpty.
Streamline the code a bit.
TODO: replicate in all the _fast files.
Change-Id: I4df16a13a19df3aaae0c42e0c12f20552f08ead6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/624055
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
It's a bit more efficient.
Change-Id: If813a597516c41fdac6f60e586641d0ee1cde025
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/623818
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
I don't think we have any code that uses this function.
Unless it is something for the future.
Change-Id: I7e44634f7a9c1d4d64d84c358447ccf213668d92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622077
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I37e5bba9cd62b2d970754ac24da7e1397ef12fd4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622076
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
The compiler will stack allocate the Map struct and initial group if
possible.
Stack maps are initialized inline without calling into the runtime.
Small heap allocated maps use makemap_small.
These are the same heuristics as existing maps.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I6c371d1309716fd1c38a3212d417b3c76db5c9b9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622042
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
A previous CL kept it across loop iterations, but those are more rare
than call iterations.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Ieea0f1677e357f5e451650b1c697da7f63f3bca1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/621116
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Speeds up iteration by about 3%.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I3406376fb8db87306d52e665fcee1f33cf610f24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/621115
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Load the field we need from the type once outside the search loop.
Get rid of the multiply to compute the slot position. Instead compute
the slot position incrementally using addition.
Move the hashing later in access2.
Based on khr@'s CL 618959.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Id11b5479fa5bc0130a1d8d9e664d0206d24942ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/620217
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
This avoids some zero-extension ops on 64-bit machines.
Based on khr@'s CL 619479.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Ie9a56da26382dc9e515c613abc8cf6fec3767671
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/620216
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Keep only a single seed; initialize it; and reset it when the map is
empty.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Icc231f70957337a2d0dcd9c7daf9bd3cb4354d71
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616466
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Add all the specialized variants that exist for the existing maps.
Like the existing maps, the fast variants do not support indirect
key/elem.
Note that as of this CL, the Get and Put methods on Map/table are
effectively dead. They are only reachable from the internal/runtime/maps
unit tests.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I95297750be6200f34ec483e4cfc897f048c26db7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616463
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
We use the same heuristics as existing maps.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I44bb51483cae2c1714717f1b501850fb9e55a39a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616461
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
This is the same design as existing maps.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I5f6ef5fea1e0f0616bcd90eaae7faee4cdac58c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616460
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Iebc7f5482299cb7c4ecccc4c2eb46b4bc42c5fc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616459
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
When given a hint size, set the initial capacity large enough to avoid
requiring growth in the average case.
When not given a hint (or given 0), don't allocate anything at all.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I8844fc652b8d2d4e5136cd56f7e78999a07fe381
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616457
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
This enables manual inlining Map.Get/table.getWithoutKey to create a
simple fast path with no calls.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Ic208dd4c02c7554f312b85b5fadccaf82b23545c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616455
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
|
|
Rather than storing the same type pointer in multiple places, just pass
it around.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Ia6c74805c7a44125ae473177b317f16c6688e6de
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622377
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
Masking the shift lets the compiler elide a few instructions for
handling a shift of > 63 bits.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I669fe01caa1de1b8521f1f56b6906f3e9066a39b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611190
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Idee1e021e3cef8f0c031e8f06efbcf6e88918d8a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/622376
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|
|
We still use the hash and control word, but loop over all 8 bytes
instead of doing the match operation, which ends up being slightly
faster when there is only one group.
Note that specialized variants added later will avoid hashing at all.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I3bb353b023dd6120b6585e87d3efe2f18ac9e1ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611189
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
If the map contains 8 or fewer entries, it is wasteful to have a
directory that points to a table that points to a group.
Add a special case that replaces the directory with a direct pointer to
a group.
We could theoretically do similar for single table maps (no directory,
just point directly to a table), but that is left for later.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I6fc04dfc11c31dadfe5b5d6481b4c4abd43d48ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611188
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
|
|
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Ic47721e101f6fee650e6825a5a241fcd12fa0009
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611185
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
|
|
While walking the probe sequence, Put keeps track of the first deleted
slot it encountered. If it reaches the end of the probe sequence without
finding a match, then it will prefer to use the deleted slot rather than
a new empty slot.
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: I19356ef6780176506f57b42990ac15dc426f1b14
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/618016
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
|
For #54766.
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-swissmap
Change-Id: Ie21ef0f33f42735eadccd75eeebb3b5e81c2f459
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/618535
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
|