| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This reverts CL 151157.
CL 151157 introduced a crash when decoding into ",string" fields. It
came with a moderate speedup, so at this stage of the release cycle
let's just revert it, and reapply it in Go 1.14 with the fix in CL 190659.
Also applied the test cases from CL 190659.
Updates #33728
Change-Id: Ie46e2bc15224b251888580daf6b79d5865f3878e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190909
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
|
|
Currently test build fails with:
$ go test -tags=gofuzz encoding/json
encoding/json/fuzz.go:36:4: Println call has possible formatting directive %s
FAIL encoding/json [build failed]
Change-Id: I23aef44a421ed0e7bcf48b74ac5a8c6768a4841b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190698
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
This is a documentation-only change.
Fixes #28827
Change-Id: Ife9ab997809048784f35872b09905bc209a05eff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188417
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
It wasn't obeyed in the case where the MarshalJSON method uses a pointer
receiver, and the encoder grabs the address of a value to find that
method. addrMarshalerEncoder is the function that does this work, but it
ignored opts.escapeHTML.
Here's the before and after of the added test case, which was failing
before the fix. Now the two cases are correct and consistent.
{"NonPtr":"<str>","Ptr":"\u003cstr\u003e"}
{"NonPtr":"<str>","Ptr":"<str>"}
Fixes #32896.
Change-Id: Idc53077ece074973558bd3bb5ad036380db0d02c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/184757
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Caleb Spare <cespare@gmail.com>
|
|
Shorten some of the longest tests that run during all.bash.
Removes 7r 50u 21s from all.bash.
After this change, all.bash is under 5 minutes again on my laptop.
For #26473.
Change-Id: Ie0460aa935808d65460408feaed210fbaa1d5d79
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/177559
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Add Unwrap methods to types which wrap an underlying error:
"encodinc/csv".ParseError
"encoding/json".MarshalerError
"net/http".transportReadFromServerError
"net".OpError
"net".DNSConfigError
"net/url".Error
"os/exec".Error
"signal/internal/pty".PtyError
"text/template".ExecError
Add os.ErrTemporary. A case could be made for putting this error
value in package net, since no exported error types in package os
include a Temporary method. However, syscall errors returned from
the os package do include this method.
Add Is methods to error types with a Timeout or Temporary method,
making errors.Is(err, os.Err{Timeout,Temporary}) equivalent to
testing the corresponding method:
"context".DeadlineExceeded
"internal/poll".TimeoutError
"net".adrinfoErrno
"net".OpError
"net".DNSError
"net/http".httpError
"net/http".tlsHandshakeTimeoutError
"net/pipe".timeoutError
"net/url".Error
Updates #30322
Updates #29934
Change-Id: I409fb20c072ea39116ebfb8c7534d493483870dc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170037
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
|
|
indirect walks down v until it gets to a non-pointer. But it does not
handle the case when v is a pointer to itself, like in:
var v interface{}
v = &v
Unmarshal(b, v)
So just stop immediately if we see v is a pointer to itself.
Fixes #31740
Change-Id: Ie396264119e24d70284cd9bf76dcb2050babb069
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174337
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Adds a sample Fuzz test function to package encoding/json following the
guidelines defined in #31309, based on
https://github.com/dvyukov/go-fuzz-corpus/blob/master/json/json.go
Fixes #31309
Updates #19109
Change-Id: I5fe04d9a5f41c0de339f8518dae30896ec14e356
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/174058
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Make explicit that Compact does HTML escaping.
Fixes #30357.
Change-Id: I4648f8f3e907d659db977d07253f716df6e07d7b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173417
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
In the common case, structs have a handful of fields and most inputs
match struct field names exactly.
The previous code would do a linear search over the fields, stopping at
the first exact match, and otherwise using the first case insensitive
match.
This is unfortunate, because it means that for the common case, we'd do
a linear search with bytes.Equal. Even for structs with only two or
three fields, that is pretty wasteful.
Worse even, up until the exact match was found via the linear search,
all previous fields would run their equalFold functions, which aren't
cheap even in the simple case.
Instead, cache a map along with the field list that indexes the fields
by their name. This way, a case sensitive field search doesn't involve a
linear search, nor does it involve any equalFold func calls.
This patch should also slightly speed up cases where there's a case
insensitive match but not a case sensitive one, as then we'd avoid
calling bytes.Equal on all the fields. Though that's not a common case,
and there are no benchmarks for it.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 11.0ms ± 0% 10.6ms ± 1% -4.42% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 176MB/s ± 0% 184MB/s ± 1% +4.62% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 2.28MB ± 0% 2.28MB ± 0% ~ (p=0.725 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 76.9k ± 0% 76.9k ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I9929c1f06c76505e5b96914199315dbdaae5dc76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172918
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
We can work out how many bytes can be unquoted trivially in
rescanLiteral, which already iterates over a string's bytes.
Removing the extra loop in unquoteBytes simplifies the function and
speeds it up, especially when decoding simple strings, which are common.
While at it, we can remove unnecessary checks like len(s)<2 and
s[0]=='"'. Add a comment explaining why.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 11.2ms ± 0% 11.1ms ± 1% -1.63% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 173MB/s ± 0% 175MB/s ± 1% +1.66% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I2436a3a7f8148a2f7a6a4cdbd7dec6b32ef5e20c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/151157
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
readValue is a hot function, clocking in at ~13% flat CPU use in
CodeDecoder. In particular, looping over the bytes is slow. That's
partially because the code contains a bounds check at the start of the
loop.
The source of the problem is that scanp is a signed integer, and comes
from a field, so the compiler doesn't know that it's non-negative. Help
it with a simple and comparatively cheap hint.
While at it, use scanp as the index variable directly, removing the need
for a duplicate index variable which is later added back into scanp.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 11.3ms ± 1% 11.2ms ± 1% -0.98% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 172MB/s ± 1% 174MB/s ± 1% +0.99% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I138f83babdf316fc97697cc18f595c3403c1ddb7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170939
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
This was the only benchmark missing the SetBytes call, as spotted
earlier by Bryan.
It's not required to make the benchmark useful, but it can still be a
good way to see how its speed is affected by the reduced allocations:
name time/op
CodeUnmarshal-8 12.1ms ± 1%
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 11.4ms ± 1%
name speed
CodeUnmarshal-8 161MB/s ± 1%
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 171MB/s ± 1%
name alloc/op
CodeUnmarshal-8 3.28MB ± 0%
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 1.94MB ± 0%
name allocs/op
CodeUnmarshal-8 92.7k ± 0%
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 77.6k ± 0%
While at it, remove some unnecessary empty lines.
Change-Id: Ib2bd92d5b3237b8f3092e8c6f863dab548fee2f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170938
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Decoder.Decode and Unmarshal actually scan the input bytes twice - the
first time to check for syntax errors and the length of the value, and
the second to perform the decoding.
It's in the second scan that we actually tokenize the bytes. Since
syntax errors aren't a possibility, we can take shortcuts.
In particular, literals such as quoted strings are very common in JSON,
so we can avoid a lot of work by special casing them.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 10.3ms ± 1% 9.1ms ± 0% -11.89% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
UnicodeDecoder-8 342ns ± 0% 283ns ± 0% -17.25% (p=0.000 n=6+5)
DecoderStream-8 239ns ± 0% 230ns ± 0% -3.90% (p=0.000 n=6+5)
CodeUnmarshal-8 11.0ms ± 0% 9.8ms ± 0% -11.45% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
CodeUnmarshalReuse-8 10.3ms ± 0% 9.0ms ± 0% -12.72% (p=0.004 n=5+6)
UnmarshalString-8 104ns ± 0% 92ns ± 0% -11.35% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
UnmarshalFloat64-8 93.2ns ± 0% 87.6ns ± 0% -6.01% (p=0.010 n=6+4)
UnmarshalInt64-8 74.5ns ± 0% 71.5ns ± 0% -3.91% (p=0.000 n=5+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 189MB/s ± 1% 214MB/s ± 0% +13.50% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
UnicodeDecoder-8 40.9MB/s ± 0% 49.5MB/s ± 0% +20.96% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
CodeUnmarshal-8 176MB/s ± 0% 199MB/s ± 0% +12.93% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I7a5e2aef51bd4ddf2004aad24210f6f50e01eaeb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/151042
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
In golang.org/cl/145218, a feature was added where the JSON decoder
would keep track of the entire path to a field when reporting an
UnmarshalTypeError.
However, we all failed to check if this affected the benchmarks - myself
included, as a reviewer. Below are the numbers comparing the CL's parent
with itself, once it was merged:
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 12.9ms ± 1% 28.2ms ± 2% +119.33% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 151MB/s ± 1% 69MB/s ± 3% -54.40% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 2.74MB ± 0% 109.39MB ± 0% +3891.83% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 77.5k ± 0% 168.5k ± 0% +117.30% (p=0.004 n=6+5)
The reason why the decoder got twice as slow is because it now allocated
~40x as many objects, which puts a lot of pressure on the garbage
collector.
The reason is that the CL concatenated strings every time a nested field
was decoded. In other words, practically every field generated garbage
when decoded. This is hugely wasteful, especially considering that the
vast majority of JSON decoding inputs won't return UnmarshalTypeError.
Instead, use a stack of fields, and make sure to always use the same
backing array, to ensure we only need to grow the slice to the maximum
depth once.
The original CL also introduced a bug. The field stack string wasn't
reset to its original state when reaching "d.opcode == scanEndObject",
so the last field in a decoded struct could leak. For example, an added
test decodes a list of structs, and encoding/json before this CL would
fail:
got: cannot unmarshal string into Go struct field T.Ts.Y.Y.Y of type int
want: cannot unmarshal string into Go struct field T.Ts.Y of type int
To fix that, simply reset the stack after decoding every field, even if
it's the last.
Below is the original performance versus this CL. There's a tiny
performance hit, probably due to the append for every decoded field, but
at least we're back to the usual ~150MB/s.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 12.9ms ± 1% 13.0ms ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.009 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 151MB/s ± 1% 149MB/s ± 1% -1.24% (p=0.009 n=6+6)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 2.74MB ± 0% 2.74MB ± 0% +0.00% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 77.5k ± 0% 77.5k ± 0% +0.00% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Finally, make all of these benchmarks report allocs by default. The
decoder ones are pretty sensitive to generated garbage, so ReportAllocs
would have made the performance regression more obvious.
Change-Id: I67b50f86b2e72f55539429450c67bfb1a9464b67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/167978
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
If a for loop has a simple condition and begins with a simple
"if x { break; }"; we can simply add "!x" to the loop's condition.
While at it, simplify a few assignments to use the common pattern
"x := staticDefault; if cond { x = otherValue(); }".
Finally, simplify a couple of var declarations.
Change-Id: I413982c6abd32905adc85a9a666cb3819139c19f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/165342
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
I had been finding these over a year or so, but none were big enough
changes to warrant CLs. They're a handful now, so clean them all up in a
single commit.
The smaller bodies get a bit simpler, but most importantly, the larger
bodies get unindented.
Change-Id: I5707a6fee27d4c9ff9efd3d363af575d7a4bf2aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/165340
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
When parsing nested object, UnmarshalTypeError does not contain actual
path to nested field in original JSON.
This commit change Field to contain the full path to that field. One
can get the Field name by stripping all the leading path elements.
Fixes #22369
Change-Id: I6969cc08abe8387a351e3fb2944adfaa0dccad2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/145218
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Comparing errors using DeepEqual breaks if frame information
is added as proposed in Issue #29934.
Updates #29934.
Change-Id: Ib430c9ddbe588dd1dd51314c408c74c07285e1ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/162179
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib00fcfd46eae27eea0a3d4cab4406f4c461fb57b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/160517
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Iaabbfe5a4c1bbedd19d4087f1b79e5a38bdd3878
GitHub-Last-Rev: 55c91fc19074dacc66623aa7ff2286b11ccd5340
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#29752
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/157958
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Both the encoding/xml and encoding/json packages support custom
marshalers for JSON and XML, as well as the basic encoding.TextMarshaler
and encoding.TextUnmarshaler interfaces, but the docs and examples for
these are missing.
There are docs for how to use encoding.TextMarshaler and
encoding.TextUnmarshaler in encoding/json, but not encoding/xml. There
are no examples for how to use them with either json or xml. This commit
includes docs for encoding/xml and examples for both encoding/json and
encoding/xml.
There is an example using custom marshalers MarshalJSON and
UnmarshalJSON in encoding/json, but not MarshalXML and UnmarshalXML in
encoding/json. These docs are more so necessary for encoding/xml because
the complexities of XML documents is significantly greater than JSON
documents which more often leads to the need for custom marshaling. The
encoding/json package includes an example of how to write a custom
marshaler, and this commit includes the same example for the xml
package.
All examples are mirrored off the existing custom marshaler example in
encoding/json.
Fixes #6859
Change-Id: Ic93abc27c0b4d5e48dea6ede4e20b1bedca4ab39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/76350
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I411483d76a2ca91cd15ff42ae1adb9134486d183
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145278
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Calling .Interface on a struct field's reflect.Value isn't always safe.
For example, if that field is an unexported anonymous struct.
We only descended into this branch if the struct type had any methods,
so this bug had gone unnoticed for a few release cycles.
Add the check, and add a simple test case.
Fixes #28145.
Change-Id: I02f7e0ab9a4a0c18a5e2164211922fe9c3d30f64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141537
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Given a program as follows:
data := []byte(`{"F": {
"a": 2,
"3": 4
}}`)
json.Unmarshal(data, &map[string]map[int]int{})
The JSON package should error, as "a" is not a valid integer. However,
we'd encounter a panic:
panic: JSON decoder out of sync - data changing underfoot?
The reason was that decodeState.object would return a nil error on
encountering the invalid map key string, while saving the key type error
for later. This broke if we were inside another object, as we would
abruptly end parsing the nested object, leaving the decoder in an
unexpected state.
To fix this, simply avoid storing the map element and continue decoding
the object, to leave the decoder state exactly as if we hadn't seen an
invalid key type.
This affected both signed and unsigned integer keys, so fix both and add
two test cases.
Updates #28189.
Change-Id: I8a6204cc3ff9fb04ed769df7a20a824c8b94faff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142518
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
This change makes stateEndTop use isSpace instead of specifically
recreating the same functionality.
Change-Id: I81f8f51682e46e7f8e2b9fed423a968457200625
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/121797
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Having these panic-like errors used to be ok, since they were used in
the internal decoder state instead of passed around via return
parameters.
Recently, the decoder was rewritten to use explicit error returns
instead. This error is a terrible fit for error returns; a handful of
functions must return an error because of it, and their callers must
check for an error that should never happen.
This is precisely what panics are for, so use them. The test coverage of
the package goes up from 91.3% to 91.6%, and performance is unaffected.
We can also get rid of some unnecessary verbosity in the code.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-4 27.5ms ± 1% 27.5ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.937 n=6+6)
Change-Id: I01033b3f5b7c0cf0985082fa272754f96bf6353c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/134835
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
|
|
The overall coverage of the json package goes up from 90.8% to 91.3%.
While at it, apply two minor code simplifications found while inspecting
the HTML coverage report.
Change-Id: I0fba968afeedc813b1385e4bde72d93b878854d7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/134735
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes: #27464
Change-Id: I270c56fd0d5ae8787a1293029aff3072f4f52f33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/132955
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes #26444
Fixes #27275
Change-Id: I9e8cbff79f7643ca8964c572c1a98172b6831730
GitHub-Last-Rev: 7eea2158b67ccab34b45a21e8f4289c36de02d93
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#26719
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/126897
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Given the following types:
type S2 struct{ Field string }
type S struct{ *S2 }
Marshalling a value of type T1 should result in "{}", as there's no way
to access any value of T2.Field. This is how Go 1.10 and earlier
versions behave.
However, in the recent refactor golang.org/cl/125417 I broke this logic.
When the encoder found an anonymous struct pointer field that was nil,
it no longer skipped the embedded fields underneath it. This can be seen
in the added test:
--- FAIL: TestAnonymousFields/EmbeddedFieldBehindNilPointer (0.00s)
encode_test.go:430: Marshal() = "{\"Field\":\"\\u003c*json.S2 Value\\u003e\"}", want "{}"
The human error was a misplaced label, meaning we weren't actually
skipping the right loop iteration. Fix that.
Change-Id: Iba8a4a77d358dac73dcba4018498fe4f81afa263
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131376
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
TestRawMessage now passes without the need for the RawMessage field to
be a pointer. The TODO dates all the way back to 2010, so I presume the
issue has since been fixed.
TestNullRawMessage tested the decoding of a JSON null into a
*RawMessage. The existing behavior was correct, but for the sake of
completeness a non-pointer RawMessage field has been added too. The
non-pointer field behaves differently, as one can read in the docs:
To unmarshal JSON into a value implementing the Unmarshaler
interface, Unmarshal calls that value's UnmarshalJSON method,
including when the input is a JSON null.
Change-Id: Iabaed75d4ed10ea427d135ee1b80c6e6b83b2e6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131377
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Encoders like map and array can use the much cheaper "i > 0" check to
see if we're not writing the first element. However, since struct fields
support omitempty, we need to keep track of that separately.
This is much more expensive - after calling the field encoder itself,
and retrieving the field via reflection, this branch was the third most
expensive piece of this field loop.
Instead, hoist the branch logic outside of the loop. The code doesn't
get much more complex, since we just delay the writing of each byte
until the next iteration. Yet the performance improvement is noticeable,
even when the struct types in CodeEncoder only have 2 and 7 fields,
respectively.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 5.39ms ± 0% 5.31ms ± 0% -1.37% (p=0.010 n=4+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 360MB/s ± 0% 365MB/s ± 0% +1.39% (p=0.010 n=4+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I2662cf459e0dfd68e56fa52bc898a417e84266c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131401
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
A few encoder struct types, such as map and slice, only encapsulate
other prepared encoder funcs. Using pointer receivers has no advantage,
and makes calling these methods slightly more expensive.
Not a huge performance win, but certainly an easy one. The struct types
used in the benchmark below contain one slice field and one pointer
field.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 5.48ms ± 0% 5.39ms ± 0% -1.66% (p=0.010 n=6+4)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 354MB/s ± 0% 360MB/s ± 0% +1.69% (p=0.010 n=6+4)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I9f78dbe07fcc6fbf19a6d96c22f5d6970db9eca4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/131400
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Some WriteByte('\\') calls can be deduplicated.
fillField is used in two occasions, but it is unnecessary when adding
fields to the "next" stack, as those aren't used for the final encoding.
Inline the func with its only remaining call.
Finally, unindent a default-if block.
The performance of the encoder is unaffected:
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 6.65ms ± 1% 6.65ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.662 n=6+5)
Change-Id: Ie55baeab89abad9b9f13e9f6ca886a670c30dba9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122461
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
This function was only used in a single place - in the field encoding
loop within the struct encoder.
Inlining the function call manually lets us get rid of the call
overhead. But most importantly, it lets us simplify the logic afterward.
We no longer need to use reflect.Value{} and !fv.IsValid(), as we can
skip the field immediately.
The two factors combined (mostly just the latter) give a moderate speed
improvement to this hot loop.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 6.01ms ± 1% 5.91ms ± 1% -1.66% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 323MB/s ± 1% 328MB/s ± 1% +1.69% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I12757c325a68abb2856026cf719c122612a1f38e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125417
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
structEncoder had two slices - the list of fields, and a list containing
the encoder for each field. structEncoder.encode then looped over the
fields, and indexed into the second slice to grab the field encoder.
However, this makes it very hard for the compiler to be able to prove
that the two slices always have the same length, and that the index
expression doesn't need a bounds check.
Merge the two slices into one to completely remove the need for bounds
checks in the hot loop.
While at it, don't copy the field elements when ranging, which greatly
speeds up the hot loop in structEncoder.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 6.18ms ± 0% 5.56ms ± 0% -10.08% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 314MB/s ± 0% 349MB/s ± 0% +11.21% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 93.2kB ± 0% 62.1kB ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I0dd47783530f439b125e084aede09dda172eb1e8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125416
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Reuse v.Type() and cachedTypeFields(t) when decoding maps and structs.
Always use the same data slices when in hot loops, to ensure that the
compiler generates good code. "for i < len(data) { use(d.data[i]) }"
makes it harder for the compiler.
Finally, do other minor clean-ups, such as deduplicating switch cases,
and using a switch instead of three chained ifs.
The decoder sees a noticeable speed-up, in particular when decoding
structs.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-4 29.8ms ± 1% 27.5ms ± 0% -7.83% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-4 65.0MB/s ± 1% 70.6MB/s ± 0% +8.49% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I9d751e22502221962da696e48996ffdeb777277d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122468
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Calling Name on a reflect.Type is somewhat expensive, as it involves a
number of nested calls and string handling.
This cost was showing up when decoding structs, as we were calling it to
set up an error context.
We can avoid the extra work unless we do encounter an error, which makes
decoding via struct types faster.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-4 31.0ms ± 1% 29.9ms ± 1% -3.69% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-4 62.6MB/s ± 1% 65.0MB/s ± 1% +3.83% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I48a3a85ef0ba96f524b7c3e9096cb2c4589e077a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122467
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
If the encoded bytes fit in the bootstrap array encodeState.scratch, use
that instead of allocating a new byte slice.
Also tweaked the Encoding vs Encoder heuristic to use the length of the
encoded bytes, not the length of the input bytes. Encoding is used for
allocations of up to 1024 bytes, as we measured 2048 to be the point
where it no longer provides a noticeable advantage.
Also added some benchmarks. Only the first case changes in behavior.
name old time/op new time/op delta
MarshalBytes/32-4 420ns ± 1% 383ns ± 1% -8.69% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
MarshalBytes/256-4 913ns ± 1% 915ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.580 n=5+6)
MarshalBytes/4096-4 7.72µs ± 0% 7.74µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.340 n=5+6)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
MarshalBytes/32-4 112B ± 0% 64B ± 0% -42.86% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
MarshalBytes/256-4 736B ± 0% 736B ± 0% ~ (all equal)
MarshalBytes/4096-4 7.30kB ± 0% 7.30kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
MarshalBytes/32-4 2.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% -50.00% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
MarshalBytes/256-4 2.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
MarshalBytes/4096-4 2.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I5fa55c27bd7728338d770ae7c0756885ba9a5724
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122462
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Struct field names are static, so we can run HTMLEscape on them when
building each struct type encoder. Then, when running the struct
encoder, we can select either the original or the escaped field name to
write directly.
When the encoder is not escaping HTML, using the original string works
because neither Go struct field names nor JSON tags allow any characters
that would need to be escaped, like '"', '\\', or '\n'.
When the encoder is escaping HTML, the only difference is that '<', '>',
and '&' are allowed via JSON struct field tags, hence why we use
HTMLEscape to properly escape them.
All of the above lets us encode field names with a simple if/else and
WriteString calls, which are considerably simpler and faster than
encoding an arbitrary string.
While at it, also include the quotes and colon in these strings, to
avoid three WriteByte calls in the loop hot path.
Also added a few tests, to ensure that the behavior in these edge cases
is not broken. The output of the tests is the same if this optimization
is reverted.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 7.12ms ± 0% 6.14ms ± 0% -13.85% (p=0.004 n=6+5)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-4 272MB/s ± 0% 316MB/s ± 0% +16.08% (p=0.004 n=6+5)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 91.9kB ± 0% 93.2kB ± 0% +1.43% (p=0.002 n=6+6)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeEncoder-4 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
Updates #5683.
Change-Id: I6f6a340d0de4670799ce38cf95b2092822d2e3ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/122460
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Updates #26775
Change-Id: I83c9eeda59769d2f35e0cc98f3a8579861d5978b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/119715
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
The existing Decoder.tokenError implementation creates its error messages by
concatenating "invalid character " + quoteChar(c) + " " + context. All context
values however already start with a space leading to error messages containing
two spaces.
This change removes " " from the concatenation expression.
Fixes #26587
Change-Id: I93d14319396636b2a40d55053bda88c98e94a81a
GitHub-Last-Rev: 6db7e1991b15beee601f558be72a2737070d8f68
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#26588
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125775
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Each URL was manually verified to ensure it did not serve up incorrect
content.
Change-Id: I4dc846227af95a73ee9a3074d0c379ff0fa955df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115798
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes gosimple warning "if err != nil { return err };
return nil' can be simplified to 'return err"
Change-Id: Ife7f78a3a76ab7802b5561d1afec536e103b504a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108275
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes #18037
Change-Id: I20e27bcc013b00b726eb348daf5ca86b138ddcc2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107598
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
|
On my system, this seems to be a significant win, with a major
reduction in allocations and minor speed improvement.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeMarshal 9.75ms ± 3% 9.24ms ± 1% -5.21% (p=0.001 n=5+10)
CodeMarshal-4 4.98ms ± 1% 4.71ms ± 1% -5.44% (p=0.001 n=5+10)
CodeMarshal-8 4.80ms ± 0% 4.77ms ± 1% -0.70% (p=0.012 n=5+9)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeMarshal 199MB/s ± 3% 210MB/s ± 1% +5.46% (p=0.001 n=5+10)
CodeMarshal-4 390MB/s ± 1% 412MB/s ± 1% +5.76% (p=0.001 n=5+10)
CodeMarshal-8 404MB/s ± 0% 407MB/s ± 1% +0.70% (p=0.012 n=5+9)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
CodeMarshal 4.59MB ± 0% 1.96MB ± 0% -57.22% (p=0.000 n=5+9)
CodeMarshal-4 4.59MB ± 0% 2.00MB ± 0% -56.39% (p=0.000 n=5+8)
CodeMarshal-8 4.59MB ± 0% 2.06MB ± 0% -55.05% (p=0.001 n=5+9)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
CodeMarshal 16.0 ± 0% 1.0 ± 0% -93.75% (p=0.000 n=5+10)
CodeMarshal-4 16.0 ± 0% 1.0 ± 0% -93.75% (p=0.000 n=5+10)
CodeMarshal-8 16.0 ± 0% 1.0 ± 0% -93.75% (p=0.000 n=5+10)
Change-Id: I9d09850d8227f523f861ae1b4ca248c4a4b16aaf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/84897
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
|
Fixes golint warning about "if block ends with a return statement, so drop this else and outdent its block".
Change-Id: Id17ad0bf37ba939386b177b709e9e3c067d8ba21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105736
Run-TryBot: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
|
The go/printer (and thus gofmt) uses a heuristic to determine
whether to break alignment between elements of an expression
list which is spread across multiple lines. The heuristic only
kicked in if the entry sizes (character length) was above a
certain threshold (20) and the ratio between the previous and
current entry size was above a certain value (4).
This heuristic worked reasonably most of the time, but also
led to unfortunate breaks in many cases where a single entry
was suddenly much smaller (or larger) then the previous one.
The behavior of gofmt was sufficiently mysterious in some of
these situations that many issues were filed against it.
The simplest solution to address this problem is to remove
the heuristic altogether and have a programmer introduce
empty lines to force different alignments if it improves
readability. The problem with that approach is that the
places where it really matters, very long tables with many
(hundreds, or more) entries, may be machine-generated and
not "post-processed" by a human (e.g., unicode/utf8/tables.go).
If a single one of those entries is overlong, the result
would be that the alignment would force all comments or
values in key:value pairs to be adjusted to that overlong
value, making the table hard to read (e.g., that entry may
not even be visible on screen and all other entries seem
spaced out too wide).
Instead, we opted for a slightly improved heuristic that
behaves much better for "normal", human-written code.
1) The threshold is increased from 20 to 40. This disables
the heuristic for many common cases yet even if the alignment
is not "ideal", 40 is not that many characters per line with
todays screens, making it very likely that the entire line
remains "visible" in an editor.
2) Changed the heuristic to not simply look at the size ratio
between current and previous line, but instead considering the
geometric mean of the sizes of the previous (aligned) lines.
This emphasizes the "overall picture" of the previous lines,
rather than a single one (which might be an outlier).
3) Changed the ratio from 4 to 2.5. Now that we ignore sizes
below 40, a ratio of 4 would mean that a new entry would have
to be 4 times bigger (160) or smaller (10) before alignment
would be broken. A ratio of 2.5 seems more sensible.
Applied updated gofmt to all of src and misc. Also tested
against several former issues that complained about this
and verified that the output for the given examples is
satisfactory (added respective test cases).
Some of the files changed because they were not gofmt-ed
in the first place.
For #644.
For #7335.
For #10392.
(and probably more related issues)
Fixes #22852.
Change-Id: I5e48b3d3b157a5cf2d649833b7297b33f43a6f6e
|
|
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeEncoder-12 1.89ms ± 1% 1.91ms ± 0% +1.16% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
CodeMarshal-12 2.09ms ± 1% 2.12ms ± 0% +1.63% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
CodeDecoder-12 8.43ms ± 1% 8.32ms ± 1% -1.35% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
UnicodeDecoder-12 399ns ± 0% 339ns ± 0% -15.00% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
DecoderStream-12 281ns ± 1% 231ns ± 0% -17.91% (p=0.000 n=20+16)
CodeUnmarshal-12 9.35ms ± 2% 9.15ms ± 2% -2.11% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
CodeUnmarshalReuse-12 8.41ms ± 2% 8.29ms ± 2% -1.34% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
UnmarshalString-12 81.2ns ± 2% 74.0ns ± 4% -8.89% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
UnmarshalFloat64-12 71.1ns ± 2% 64.3ns ± 1% -9.60% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
UnmarshalInt64-12 60.6ns ± 2% 53.2ns ± 0% -12.28% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
Issue10335-12 96.9ns ± 0% 87.7ns ± 1% -9.52% (p=0.000 n=17+20)
Unmapped-12 247ns ± 4% 231ns ± 3% -6.34% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
TypeFieldsCache/MissTypes1-12 11.1µs ± 0% 11.1µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.376 n=19+20)
TypeFieldsCache/MissTypes10-12 33.9µs ± 0% 33.8µs ± 0% -0.32% (p=0.000 n=18+9)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeEncoder-12 1.03GB/s ± 1% 1.01GB/s ± 0% -1.15% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
CodeMarshal-12 930MB/s ± 1% 915MB/s ± 0% -1.60% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
CodeDecoder-12 230MB/s ± 1% 233MB/s ± 1% +1.37% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
UnicodeDecoder-12 35.0MB/s ± 0% 41.2MB/s ± 0% +17.60% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
CodeUnmarshal-12 208MB/s ± 2% 212MB/s ± 2% +2.16% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Issue10335-12 184B ± 0% 184B ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Unmapped-12 216B ± 0% 216B ± 0% ~ (all equal)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Issue10335-12 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Unmapped-12 4.00 ± 0% 4.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Change-Id: I4b1a87a205da2ef9a572f86f85bc833653c61570
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/98440
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
