diff options
| author | Wingrez <31106425+wingrez@users.noreply.github.com> | 2024-01-21 09:26:40 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> | 2024-01-22 16:54:50 +0000 |
| commit | 29cea6583ead4fa5b12a333e6a9dabe3f8a52fdd (patch) | |
| tree | a1b76764dc8a20f1335d342806b19b4aecca379f | |
| parent | 4ca1caf407f6bbadbc9235bbcc08036f1eef907b (diff) | |
| download | go-29cea6583ead4fa5b12a333e6a9dabe3f8a52fdd.tar.xz | |
cmd/compile/internal/ssa: fix typo in sccp
Change-Id: I7f522a4e1b0c50a469ce948249342d6e7cf7777c
GitHub-Last-Rev: f89d7ee576814c6ebde823b68a0b64bba8c2ad8f
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#65188
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/557255
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/sccp.go | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/sccp.go b/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/sccp.go index 77a6f50961..ecc0f94e5b 100644 --- a/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/sccp.go +++ b/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/sccp.go @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ func sccp(f *Func) { // build it early since we rely heavily on the def-use chain later t.buildDefUses() - // pick up either an edge or SSA value from worklilst, process it + // pick up either an edge or SSA value from worklist, process it for { if len(t.edges) > 0 { edge := t.edges[0] @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ func equals(a, b lattice) bool { return true } -// possibleConst checks if Value can be fold to const. For those Values that can +// possibleConst checks if Value can be folded to const. For those Values that can // never become constants(e.g. StaticCall), we don't make futile efforts. func possibleConst(val *Value) bool { if isConst(val) { @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ func computeLattice(f *Func, val *Value, args ...*Value) lattice { // However, this would create a huge switch for all opcodes that can be // evaluated during compile time. Moreover, some operations can be evaluated // only if its arguments satisfy additional conditions(e.g. divide by zero). - // It's fragile and error prone. We did a trick by reusing the existing rules + // It's fragile and error-prone. We did a trick by reusing the existing rules // in generic rules for compile-time evaluation. But generic rules rewrite // original value, this behavior is undesired, because the lattice of values // may change multiple times, once it was rewritten, we lose the opportunity |