diff options
| author | Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> | 2023-02-14 15:09:27 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> | 2023-02-14 23:10:23 +0000 |
| commit | 5d780f9c81c0bfb015b523441e10ccc325b16a40 (patch) | |
| tree | beb59b82f64881f08068c9b5b48dbc8179edc629 | |
| parent | 852f89bdf7f182acb3eee622de9feacca467d9ee (diff) | |
| download | go-x-proposal-5d780f9c81c0bfb015b523441e10ccc325b16a40.tar.xz | |
go2draft-error-handling-overview: update Microsoft blog links
Change-Id: I39ff235ce4b591fa93ffec4b2154abed428990ee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/proposal/+/468395
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | design/go2draft-error-handling-overview.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/design/go2draft-error-handling-overview.md b/design/go2draft-error-handling-overview.md index 3ee67fd..37cef42 100644 --- a/design/go2draft-error-handling-overview.md +++ b/design/go2draft-error-handling-overview.md @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ including C++, C#, Java, and Python—represents implicit checking of implicit r The subtleties of implicit checking are covered well in Raymond Chen’s pair of blog posts, -"[Cleaner, more elegant, and wrong](https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040422-00/?p=39683)" (2004), -and "[Cleaner, more elegant, and harder to recognize](https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20050114-00/?p=36693)" (2005). +"[Cleaner, more elegant, and wrong](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040422-00/?p=39683)" (2004), +and "[Cleaner, more elegant, and harder to recognize](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20050114-00/?p=36693)" (2005). In essence, because you can’t see implicit checks at all, it is very hard to verify by inspection that the error handling code correctly recovers from the state of the program at the time the check fails. |